Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐏𝐈𝐓 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝐅𝟏

Channel

𝐏𝐈𝐓 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝐅𝟏

@pitstop_f11644

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

24subscribers

-1 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004352428920
TypeChannel
Username@pitstop_f11644
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 21 July 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded12 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pitstop_f11644

Growth

23252412 August 2026 — 25 subscribers12 August 2026 — 25 subscribers20 August 2026 — 23 subscribers28 August 2026 — 24 subscribers3 September 2026 — 23 subscribers12 September 2026 — 24 subscribers12 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 30 days, net -1. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 23–25 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 00:3624+1
3 Sept 2026, 21:4123-1
28 Aug 2026, 00:5424+1
20 Aug 2026, 21:4323-2
12 Aug 2026, 15:0125no change
12 Aug 2026, 14:5225first reading

Engagement

16 posts held, back to 21 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 8 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

107 reactions across 12 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3129.0%
👍1816.8%
custom 53256009326820403481312.1%
custom 526047894632297360065.61%
🔥65.61%
custom 526053065343425331732.80%
custom 526743172957604788332.80%
custom 538881367293404536732.80%
custom 538902108978967261432.80%
custom 542938439786854118732.80%
custom 544294007056896309432.80%
custom 544296767432377009632.80%
custom 544964623250492803332.80%
🥰32.80%
custom 527389513996045999421.87%
custom 527394201952849720221.87%
custom 529411572573094474110.935%
👏10.935%

Custom emoji. 13 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 107 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2026 to 8 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

8 Aug 2026, 08:42 UTC15 views6 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎉С днём рождения Арвид Линдблад! 🟦Сегодня самому молодому британскому гонщику ф1 исполняется 19 лет!

❤2custom 52738951399604599942custom 52739420195284972022

4 Aug 2026, 13:27 UTC34 views8 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻ 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐔𝐌 𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐆𝐈 𝐺𝑒𝑜𝑟𝑔𝑒 𝑅𝑢𝑠𝑠𝑒𝑙 ჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻ Нажми сюда чтобы забрать ТЫК ჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻ PIT STOP F1 ჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻ #ДжорджРассел #эмодзи

custom 54429400705689630943custom 54429676743237700963❤2

3 Aug 2026, 07:29 UTC34 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✧・゚: *✧・゚:* STIKERY *:・゚✧*:・゚✧ ▅ ▆ █ⲙᥲ᥊ ᥎ᥱr᥉tᥲρρᥱᥒ█ ▆ ▅ ✧ ━━━━━━୨୧━━━━━━✧ PIT STOP F1 ✧ ━━━━━━୨୧━━━━━━✧ #МаксФерстаппен #стикеры

❤3custom 52674317295760478833custom 54496462325049280333

1 Aug 2026, 10:34 UTC30 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✧・゚: *✧・゚:* STIKERY *:・゚✧*:・゚✧ ▅ ▆ █ᥴhᥲrᥣᥱ᥉ ᥣᥱᥴᥣᥱrᥴ█ ▆ ▅ ✧ ━━━━━━୨୧━━━━━━✧ PIT STOP F1 ✧ ━━━━━━୨୧━━━━━━✧ #ШарльЛеклер #стикеры

❤3custom 52604789463229736003custom 52605306534342533173

31 Jul 2026, 11:11 UTC35 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻ 𝐏𝐑𝐄𝐌𝐈𝐔𝐌 𝐄𝐌𝐎𝐆𝐈 𝐂𝐡𝐚𝐫𝐥𝐞𝐬 𝐋𝐞𝐜𝐥𝐞𝐫𝐜 ჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻ Нажми сюда чтобы забрать ТЫК ჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻ PIT STOP F1 ჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻჻ #ШарльЛеклер #эмодзи

❤3custom 52604789463229736003custom 54293843978685411873

29 Jul 2026, 08:42 UTC38 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

🎉 С Днем Рождения Фернандо Алонсо! 🤩Сегодня двукратному чемпиону мира исполняется 45 лет!

❤3custom 53888136729340453673custom 53890210897896726143

28 Jul 2026, 09:44 UTC35 views12 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✧・゚: *✧・゚:* STIKERY *:・゚✧*:・゚✧ ▅ ▆ █ⲩυⲕⲓ ⲧsυⲛⲟⲇⲁ█ ▆ ▅ ✧ ━━━━━━୨୧━━━━━━✧ PIT STOP F1 ✧ ━━━━━━୨୧━━━━━━✧ #ЮкиЦунода #стикеры

❤3👍3🥰3👏1custom 52941157257309447411custom 53256009326820403481

23 Jul 2026, 18:34 UTC38 views9 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

✧・゚: *✧・゚:* STIKERY *:・゚✧*:・゚✧ ▃ ▅ ▆ █ⳋⲉⲟrⳋⲉ rυssⲉⳑⳑ█ ▆ ▅ ▃ ✧ ━━━━━━୨୧━━━━━━✧ PIT STOP F1 ✧ ━━━━━━୨୧━━━━━━✧ #ДжорджРассел #стикеры

❤3👍3custom 53256009326820403483

Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @pitstop_f11644. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐏𝐈𝐓 𝐒𝐓𝐎𝐏 𝐅𝟏” (@pitstop_f11644), 24 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pitstop_f11644.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.