Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 79% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Observations
These are measurements, not verdicts. Each one below states something we counted, alongside the evidence it was counted from, so you can check it rather than take it. None of them is graded: every observation this register holds is recorded at severity 0, because the precision of the detectors behind them has not been measured yet, and a rating we cannot support is worse than none. Read each as a fact about the data, not as a judgement about the channel. How we measure.
Views per post sit far below this size band
33.4 average views per post against 13,021 subscribers — an engagement rate of 0.257%. Across the 19,904 registered channels in the same cohort — 10,000–31,614 subscribers, posting mainly in Russian — the middle half sit between 4.95% and 18.5%, with a median of 9.71%.
What this was computed from
Window
30 days (20 August 2026 – 19 September 2026)
Posts measured
9 of 9 published in the window (9 exact, 0 rounded by Telegram)
Views totalled
301
Mature posts only
0.277% over 8 posts read at least 24h after publication
When this is recorded. A channel is listed here only when its engagement rate sits at or below the 1st percentile of its cohort and is at least 3× away from that cohort’s median — below it — on both the all-readings figure and the mature-only figure. The percentile alone would be circular: a percentile cut puts the same share of every cohort in the tail whatever the data looks like. The distance from the median is what makes it a statement about this channel.
This is not a verdict, and the direction is not a quality signal. A low rate has many innocent causes — audiences that read in the Telegram app without opening the channel, a subscriber base built long before the current output, an audience in a different timezone from our reading. A high rate has innocent causes too: a post that travelled far beyond the channel’s own subscribers will do it. We publish the measurement and the distribution it sits in. The full cohort baselines are downloadable, so this comparison can be reproduced rather than trusted.
Recorded under the key err_low, last confirmed 19 September 2026. An observation that a later pass no longer finds is cleared, and a cleared observation is removed from this page rather than being shown struck through — we do not keep publishing a claim we have withdrawn. Dispute an observation.
Growth
32 measurements spanning 41 days, net -1,411. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,809–14,644 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 32
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
17 Sept 2026, 11:01
13,021
-27
15 Sept 2026, 09:01
13,048
-18
13 Sept 2026, 16:39
13,066
-15
11 Sept 2026, 21:37
13,081
-54
9 Sept 2026, 08:38
13,135
-23
6 Sept 2026, 00:36
13,158
-36
4 Sept 2026, 00:40
13,194
-28
2 Sept 2026, 17:27
13,222
-90
1 Sept 2026, 14:26
13,312
-234
31 Aug 2026, 16:24
13,546
-80
30 Aug 2026, 17:12
13,626
-6
29 Aug 2026, 18:27
13,632
-8
28 Aug 2026, 14:53
13,640
-71
27 Aug 2026, 12:08
13,711
-102
26 Aug 2026, 09:53
13,813
-49
25 Aug 2026, 10:44
13,862
-56
24 Aug 2026, 07:08
13,918
-45
22 Aug 2026, 14:29
13,963
-32
21 Aug 2026, 05:45
13,995
-101
20 Aug 2026, 09:13
14,096
first reading
Engagement
30 posts held, back to 11 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 49 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR · 30 days
0.257%
avg views ÷ 13,021 subscribers
Avg views / post
33.4
9 posts measured
Reaction rate
26.2%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
9
of 30 held
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
What these figures were computed from
Window
Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held
30 (11 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total
301
Reactions total
79
Forwards / comments
not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken
2 Sept 2026, 20:24 UTC
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
38s
Average length
10s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
293 reactions across 30 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
130
44.4%
🔥
77
26.3%
👍
54
18.4%
🎉
14
4.78%
😁
9
3.07%
🥰
5
1.71%
🤯
4
1.37%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 30 of the 30 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 293 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 30 most recent posts we hold, published 11 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Мечтаете полноценно отдохнуть душой и телом на этих выходных? 😎
Для этого много не надо: близкий человек рядом, телефон на беззвучном режиме и холодное Юзовское безалкогольное с любимой закуской.
Один такой вечер, и вы как новенький! 💯
📲 Юзовское безалкогольное в MAX
С последней пятницей лета! 🤯
Ещё вчера мы открывали купальный сезон и радовались началу лета, а уже завтра первый день осени. Но не будем грустить!
Пусть за окном с каждым днём становится прохладнее, зато в бокале всегда может быть что-то приятное.
Юзовское безалкогольное поможет скрасить наступающую осень❤️🩹
📲 Юзовское безалкогольное в MAX
100 вопросов за один вечер – вы готовы❓
И снова BrainSurf в «Бочке»! В этот раз особый формат – 27 августа в 19:30 стартует квиз «100 вопросов», где будет 10 раундов по 10 простых вопросов. Задача команды – пройти их все и, если повезёт, выбить заветные 100 из 100 ⚡️
⭕️Уровень – средний
⭕️Стоимость – 500 рублей с человека
⭕️Призы – подарки от Юзовского для команд, занявших 1,2 и 3 места
⭕️Где: Донецк, ресторан «Боч…
Соус, ради которого стоит сварить брокколи 🤌
Продолжаем развеивать миф, что безалкогольное пиво вкусное только в бокале. Сегодня предлагаем попробовать его в соусе! Делимся рецептом, который превратит скучную брокколи в изысканное блюдо, которое хочется готовить снова и снова.
Вам понадобится:
⭕️ Брокколи – 330 г;
⭕️ Юзовское безалкогольное – половина стакана;
⭕️ Молоко – ¾ стакана;
⭕️ Мука – 1,5 ст. л.;
⭕️ Чеддер…
Пена важнее, чем вы думаете 💯
Белоснежная пивная шапка может рассказать о пенном даже больше, чем этикетка! Если она пышная и стойкая, значит, технология соблюдена идеально. Если же исчезает быстро, это повод задуматься, всё ли чисто с производством.
Хорошая пена удерживает аромат хмеля, не даёт пиву выдыхаться и делает каждый глоток мягче.
Кстати, у Юзовского безалкогольного с пеной всё отлично: она плотная, стой…
«Спартак» и «Зенит» играют в это воскресенье 🤩
23 августа в 20:00 нас ждёт матч, в котором любая мелочь может стать решающей. На поле сойдутся «Зенит» и «Спартак»: обе команды умеют забивать и не любят уступать.
Такой матч нужно смотреть с правильным настроением и хорошим пенным. Охлаждайте Юзовское безалкогольное и болейте за любимую команду! 😎
Пишите свои прогнозы на игру в комментариях⬇️
📲 Юзовское безалкоголь…
Если вы тоже перегрелись за эту рабочую неделю, сегодня обязательно откройте бутылочку холодного Юзовского безалкогольного, сделайте глоток и почувствуйте, как вместе с пенным уходит вся недельная суета ✨
📲 Юзовское безалкогольное в MAX
Однажды вам предложат встретиться и выпить по бутылочке холодного Юзовского безалкогольного 🤌
В этот момент важно согласиться.
📲 Юзовское безалкогольное в MAX
Пиво + банановый сок – тренд этого лета 🤯
Если вы ещё не пробовали такой необычный микс, очень советуем это исправить в ближайшее время. Коктейль из бананового сока и пенного освежает, удивляет и запоминается своим вкусом.
Рецепт очень простой:
1️⃣ Наполните высокий бокал льдом.
2️⃣ Налейте 400-450 мл Юзовского безалкогольного.
3️⃣ Затем медленно долейте 200 мл бананового сока с мякотью.
4️⃣ Для эстетики добав…
Согласитесь, в жаркий день нет ничего вкуснее и желаннее, чем бутылочка холодного пенного 🔥
Сохраняйте простую инструкцию, как пить наше Юзовское безалкогольное 😎
📲 Юзовское безалкогольное в MAX
Зенит – Динамо: битва за лидерство 😅
16 августа в 14:30 на поле выходят «Зенит» и «Динамо». Обе команды привыкли бороться за самое высокое место, и каждая потеря очков здесь оборачивается серьёзным ударом по турнирным планам.
Словом, будет горячо! Рекомендуем смотреть этот матч с друзьями под вкусные закуски и Юзовское безалкогольное 💯
Пишите в комментариях, за какую команду болеете ↘️
📲 Юзовское безалкогольное в…
❤5👍5🔥3
Showing the 12 most recent of 30 posts we hold for @pivouza. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Юзовское пиво Донбасса безалкогольное” (@pivouza), 13,021 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pivouza.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.