Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Плаха

Channel

Плаха

@plaha_band

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

203subscribers

-4 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002203800194
TypeChannel
Username@plaha_band
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/plaha_band

Growth

2032112077 August 2026 — 207 subscribers7 August 2026 — 208 subscribers8 August 2026 — 208 subscribers24 August 2026 — 211 subscribers10 September 2026 — 205 subscribers19 September 2026 — 203 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 43 days, net -4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 202–212 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 13:37203-2
10 Sept 2026, 01:19205-6
24 Aug 2026, 07:31211+3
8 Aug 2026, 11:05208no change
7 Aug 2026, 21:10208+1
7 Aug 2026, 11:32207first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 2 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

221 reactions across 8 posts, in 16 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 29.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
6529.4%
🔥5424.4%
❤‍🔥3616.3%
125.43%
custom 5269763982717099678104.52%
custom 521760839525048558394.07%
🍓83.62%
custom 603501475557015856262.71%
😢62.71%
custom 603303240482475523441.81%
custom 533488422961441610631.36%
custom 533724152670979105420.905%
👍20.905%
👏20.905%
custom 603284422083268124810.452%
🤯10.452%

Custom emoji. 7 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 221 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 2 May 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:54 UTC155 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Друзья! Важная информация! К сожалению, мы вынуждены сообщить о переносе концерта в Великом Новгороде 5 сентября. Новая дата станет известна, как только завершится процесс согласования мероприятия. Продажа билетов на данный момент остановлена. Сейчас непросто говорить подробнее, но как только появится конкретика — сразу обо всём расскажем. По билетам: если хотите вернуть — напишите мне. Если готовы подождать — отл

custom 52697639827170996789😢6👍2🤯1

13 Jul 2026, 06:38 UTC284 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Возвращаемся в Великий Новгород 5 сентября. Сыграем расширенную программу и привезем много нового мерча Встреча // Билеты Думаем об организации автобуса для зрителей из Петербурга. Кому было бы актуально, ставьте плюсик

144custom 53372415267097910542🔥1custom 52697639827170996781custom 60330324048247552341

20 Jun 2026, 14:58 UTC402 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Работаем над новым альбомом

❤‍🔥15🔥14custom 603501475557015856241👏1custom 52176083952504855831custom 53348842296144161061

21 May 2026, 09:53 UTC538 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Плаха это про любовь

20❤‍🔥5🍓2custom 60328442208326812481

16 May 2026, 17:43 UTC451 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @shutter_memoriesPhoto

А вот «Плаха». Ради них и ходил. Ещё оказались очень крутыми Ospa 1959, первая же группа понравилась только барабанщиком (он потом и в «Оспе» сет оттарабанил), а «Культуру курения» я вообще не понимаю и потому уехал домой в деревню.

11🔥7custom 52176083952504855833🍓2custom 603501475557015856221

6 May 2026, 09:52 UTC387 views29 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Костры х Мясафест 1 мая в КЦ Сердце Все фотокарточки здесь

❤‍🔥16🔥6custom 603303240482475523432🍓1custom 52176083952504855831

3 May 2026, 16:42 UTC385 views46 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

19🔥125custom 52176083952504855834🍓3custom 53348842296144161062👏1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @plaha_band. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Плаха” (@plaha_band), 203 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plaha_band.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.