Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПланФакт — про бизнес и деньги

Channel

ПланФакт — про бизнес и деньги

@planfact_io

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

5,926subscribers

-129 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001406923055
TypeChannel
Username@planfact_io
DescriptionПишем об управлении бизнесом и деньгами простым языком Помогаем вести учет финансов без боли → https://planfact.io Сервис №1 на StartPack, 1500 отзывов → https://startpack.ru/application/planfact Поддержка: @PlanFactSupBot Сотрудничество: @plan_fact_io
CreatedBetween 1 February 2019 and 30 November 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 November 2026
Measurements held23
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 2 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/planfact_io

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 50% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,9266,0555,990.56 August 2026 — 6,055 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,055 subscribers7 August 2026 — 6,052 subscribers10 August 2026 — 6,044 subscribers13 August 2026 — 6,039 subscribers16 August 2026 — 6,035 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,028 subscribers23 August 2026 — 6,026 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,022 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,018 subscribers1 September 2026 — 6,011 subscribers4 September 2026 — 6,006 subscribers10 September 2026 — 6,001 subscribers14 September 2026 — 5,996 subscribers18 September 2026 — 5,995 subscribers27 September 2026 — 5,979 subscribers5 October 2026 — 5,953 subscribers12 October 2026 — 5,960 subscribers15 October 2026 — 5,952 subscribers17 October 2026 — 5,944 subscribers23 October 2026 — 5,938 subscribers27 October 2026 — 5,930 subscribers30 October 2026 — 5,926 subscribers6 August 202630 October 2026
23 measurements spanning 85 days, net -129. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,907–6,074 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 23
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
30 Oct 2026, 14:315,926-4
27 Oct 2026, 07:495,930-8
23 Oct 2026, 23:385,938-6
17 Oct 2026, 20:285,944-8
15 Oct 2026, 03:575,952-8
12 Oct 2026, 09:555,960+7
5 Oct 2026, 15:015,953-26
27 Sept 2026, 20:215,979-16
18 Sept 2026, 13:175,995-1
14 Sept 2026, 02:185,996-5
10 Sept 2026, 01:186,001-5
4 Sept 2026, 14:186,006-5
1 Sept 2026, 06:046,011-7
29 Aug 2026, 04:126,018-4
26 Aug 2026, 14:036,022-4
23 Aug 2026, 09:586,026-2
20 Aug 2026, 03:576,028-7
16 Aug 2026, 22:346,035-4
13 Aug 2026, 12:086,039-5
10 Aug 2026, 11:256,044first reading

Engagement

41 posts held, back to 4 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 10 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.88%
avg views ÷ 5,926 subscribers
Avg views / post
467
14 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.97%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
14
of 41 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 12 of 14 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 November 2026
Posts held41 (4 June 2026 – 3 November 2026)
Views total6,541
Reactions total111
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 12:56 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
862
Videos
12
Links
774

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.

Video runtime
1m 15s
Average length
38s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

285 reactions across 39 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍9031.6%
🔥8931.2%
❤5820.4%
🤝269.12%
👏62.11%
🙏51.75%
❤‍🔥31.05%
💯31.05%
👨‍💻20.702%
⚡10.351%
👎10.351%
🤔10.351%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 39 of the 41 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 285 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 41 most recent posts we hold, published 4 June 2026 to 3 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 14 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

3 Nov 2026, 10:26 UTC189 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Приглашаем на демо-тур с сооснователем ПланФакта Алексеем Боевым 🚀 📅 Когда: 11 ноября в 16:00 по МСК Если вы еще не начали вести учет в ПланФакте, то этот тур для вас. На примере проектного бизнеса покажем, как в сервисе можно: — контролировать деньги и прибыль с помощью финансовых отчётов; — автоматизировать учёт и сбор данных; — использовать ИИ для анализа финансов; — планировать платежи и избегать кассовых раз…

❤2👍1

30 Oct 2026, 07:33 UTC334 views9 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Аванс от клиента — это выручка или еще нет? Объясняет Мария Белихина, ведущий финансист ПланФакта. Поступление денег на счет и выручка — разные показатели. При предоплате клиент платит до получения товара или услуги, при отсрочке — после. Поэтому поступление денег и признание выручки могут приходиться на разные месяцы, а иногда и годы. В управленческом учете используют два подхода к признанию выручки: — Метод нач…

👍5❤2🔥2

29 Oct 2026, 12:45 UTC329 viewsread 4 November 2026

🔔 Демо-тур по ПланФакту начинается Заходите! Алексей Боев покажет, как: — контролировать деньги и прибыль с помощью финансовых отчётов; — автоматизировать учёт и сбор данных; — использовать ИИ для анализа финансов; — планировать платежи и избегать кассовых разрывов. А ещё ответим на ваши вопросы в прямом эфире!

27 Oct 2026, 09:54 UTC383 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026

🫣 Что будет с бизнесом, если не выполнится план продаж В большинстве бизнес-планов есть одна проблема: в них всё идёт по плану. Продажи выходят на прогнозные показатели, расходы не растут, запуски и поставки не задерживаются, а клиенты платят вовремя. В реальном бизнесе так почти не бывает. Поэтому при планировании важно отвечать не только на вопрос «сколько заработаем», но и на более важный: Что будет, если всё …

👍1🔥1🤝1

23 Oct 2026, 11:09 UTC517 views12 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Приглашаем на демо-тур с сооснователем ПланФакта Алексеем Боевым 🚀 📅 Когда: 29 октября в 16:00 по МСК Если вы еще не начали вести учет в ПланФакте, то этот тур для вас. Покажем, как в сервисе можно: — контролировать деньги и прибыль с помощью финансовых отчётов; — автоматизировать учёт и сбор данных; — использовать ИИ для анализа финансов; — планировать платежи и избегать кассовых разрывов. А ещё ответим на ваши…

🔥7❤3👍2

23 Oct 2026, 07:31 UTC474 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

🔔 Новое в ПланФакте. Платежный календарь по дням В разделе «План» появился Платежный календарь Beta — новый способ контролировать платежи по дням. Новый календарный вид помогает быстрее замечать проблемные даты, оценивать будущие остатки и управлять платежами. Что нового: ● Видно, на какие дни приходятся поступления и выплаты и как меняется остаток. ● Можно оценить показатели не только за месяц, но и по кварталам…

🔥4❤2👍2

21 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC408 views12 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

💬 Как учитывать личные расходы собственника, оплаченные со счёта компании? Объясняет Анжела Якименко, ведущий финансист ПланФакта. Собственник оплатил с расчётного счёта компании личную покупку. Деньги списались, но можно ли считать эту сумму расходом бизнеса? Если покупка не связана с получением выручки, производством продукта, оказанием услуг или обеспечением деятельности компании, это не расход бизнеса, даже ес…

❤5👍4🔥3

20 Oct 2026, 12:50 UTC465 views5 reactionsread 4 November 2026

🔔 Лекция «ИИ для бизнеса» начинается Заходите! Сооснователь ПланФакта Алексей Боев на реальных примерах покажет: — как ИИ помогает в продажах, маркетинге, финансах, бухгалтерии и HR; — как выбрать первую задачу для внедрения; — какие процессы стоит автоматизировать в первую очередь; — как работать с ИИ безопасно; — как вовлечь сотрудников и получить измеримый результат. В конце встречи Алексей разберёт несколько …

🔥3👍1🤝1

19 Oct 2026, 11:04 UTC476 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Уже завтра! Онлайн-лекция «ИИ для бизнеса: разобраться и внедрить» Сооснователь ПланФакта Алексей Боев на реальных примерах покажет: — как ИИ помогает в продажах, маркетинге, финансах, бухгалтерии и HR; — как выбрать первую задачу для внедрения; — какие процессы стоит автоматизировать в первую очередь; — как работать с ИИ безопасно; — как вовлечь сотрудников и получить измеримый результат. В конце встречи Алексей …

🔥4👍2🤝2

13 Oct 2026, 14:02 UTC619 views7 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

🔔 Новое в ПланФакте. Тренды в Балансе В табличной форме Баланса появились тренды — теперь динамику показателей видно прямо в отчете. По мини-графикам видно, как меняются деньги, задолженность, запасы и другие статьи. Примеры использования ● Деньги и обязательства: деньги сокращаются, обязательства растут. Повод проверить будущую платежную нагрузку. ● Долги клиентов: дебиторская задолженность растет. Повод провер…

👍3🔥2🤝2

13 Oct 2026, 07:02 UTC689 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Ваши сотрудники используют нейросети, но бизнес не чувствует эффекта? 20 октября в 16:00 мск приглашаем на бесплатную онлайн-лекцию «ИИ для бизнеса: разобраться и внедрить». Сооснователь ПланФакта Алексей Боев на реальных примерах покажет: — как ИИ помогает в продажах, маркетинге, финансах, бухгалтерии и HR; — как выбрать первую задачу для внедрения; — какие процессы стоит автоматизировать в первую очередь; — как …

🔥6⚡1👍1

12 Oct 2026, 08:50 UTC500 views32 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Друзья и коллеги, Мы внимательно следим за тем, что происходит с дата-центрами в последние дни. Инфраструктура и данные ПланФакта не были затронуты недавними инцидентами. За 10 лет работы наша команда инженеров научилась справляться с самыми разными сбоями — от отказа отдельных узлов связи до масштабных проблем с доступностью сетевой инфраструктуры. Мы предусмотрели и более сложные сценарии. Для этого используем …

❤18🤝5🙏5❤‍🔥3👎1

Showing the 12 most recent of 41 posts we hold for @planfact_io. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Финансовый директор | Мастер CFO
@findir_pro · 44,295
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 28 August 2026
Нескучные Финансы
@noboring_finance · 64,725
Telegram ranks this channel #31 of 97 here — alongside 96 others — read 21 August 2026
Финансовый директор
@financ_director · 20,861
Telegram ranks this channel #49 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 25 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 30 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПланФакт — про бизнес и деньги” (@planfact_io), 5,926 subscribers as measured 30 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/planfact_io.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.