عه 50k شدیم که بوس بهتون و مرسی که هستین ❤️
❤128🗿45⚡8

Channel
@playlabfam
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry
51,727subscribers
+7,786 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003911181803 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @playlabfam |
| Description | میتونی بهم پیام بدی: @dUiuuu 🤖 @PlayLabBot |
| Created | 6 May 2026 — measured — dated from the channel’s first post |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 November 2026 |
| Measurements held | 58 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 November 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/playlabfam |
Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Nov 2026, 12:59 | 51,727 | +31 |
| 3 Nov 2026, 09:39 | 51,696 | -48 |
| 2 Nov 2026, 09:27 | 51,744 | -47 |
| 1 Nov 2026, 07:04 | 51,791 | -37 |
| 31 Oct 2026, 03:47 | 51,828 | -23 |
| 30 Oct 2026, 03:06 | 51,851 | -80 |
| 29 Oct 2026, 06:09 | 51,931 | -246 |
| 28 Oct 2026, 02:51 | 52,177 | +46 |
| 27 Oct 2026, 01:07 | 52,131 | +218 |
| 26 Oct 2026, 02:17 | 51,913 | +154 |
| 24 Oct 2026, 23:29 | 51,759 | +223 |
| 23 Oct 2026, 20:00 | 51,536 | +165 |
| 22 Oct 2026, 21:28 | 51,371 | +495 |
| 21 Oct 2026, 17:47 | 50,876 | +415 |
| 20 Oct 2026, 14:16 | 50,461 | +435 |
| 19 Oct 2026, 17:50 | 50,026 | +186 |
| 18 Oct 2026, 19:05 | 49,840 | +289 |
| 17 Oct 2026, 18:18 | 49,551 | +571 |
| 16 Oct 2026, 20:26 | 48,980 | +773 |
| 15 Oct 2026, 17:21 | 48,207 | first reading |
22 posts held, back to 6 May 2026 — the reader has reached the start of this channel’s public history, so this is the full archive Telegram still exposes. Read across 182 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 18 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 22 (6 May 2026 – 18 October 2026) |
| Views total | 53,110 |
| Reactions total | 374 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 19 Oct 2026, 12:39 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
4,518 reactions across 21 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 75.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 3,405 | 75.4% | |
| 👾 | 543 | 12.0% | |
| ⚡ | 434 | 9.61% | |
| 🗿 | 136 | 3.01% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 21 of the 22 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 4,518 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 22 most recent posts we hold, published 6 May 2026 to 18 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 3 of 4 posts held from the last 30 days (75.0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).
عه 50k شدیم که بوس بهتون و مرسی که هستین ❤️
❤128🗿45⚡8
Posted without readable text
❤101🗿6
بخش ساخت Arena یا مسابقه بروز شده و میتونید یه اسم واسش انتخاب کنید و بفرستید توی گروه یا کانالتون یا حتی پیوی دوستاتون. میتونید شرط ورود بزارید که قبل از شروع بازی توی گروه یا کانالتون بازیکن عضو بشه. میتونید به بازیکن ها فرصت نامحدود یا محدود بدید و بازیکنها میتونن بعد از تموم شدن با دعوت دوستاشون فرصتهای جدیدی رو بگیرند. بزودی میتونید جایزه تایین کنید یا کاربر با پرداخت ورودی برای دریافت جایزه رقابت کنه
⚡25🗿8👾7
خب بچه ها بازی مار به ربات اضافه شد. 🐍 [ Play ]
❤46
میخوایم یه بخش مینی اپ بیاریم بازیهای قدیمی مثل مار Nokia رو اضافه کنیم👀🐍
❤258👾43🗿17
فکت گیمری
❤608🗿60⚡12
تلگرام عالیه. کنترلش دست خودته. یه فید واسه خودت ساختی چند تا کانال و گروه که دوست داری رو عضوی، نه خبری از بلاگر نون به نرخ روز خور هست نه اونی که فقط میخواد با مطلب زرد ویو بگیره. نه توییت اونی که با این طرز فکرش مملکت رو بهفنا داده. آخرین اخبار رو هم که بهدستت میرسه. واقعیتهای جامعه رو هم من کف تلگرام بیشتر دیدم تا توییتر و اینستاگرام. فک کنم همین یهذره روان هم که مونده واسه تلگرام باشه.
❤670👾26⚡18
بازیهای ناشناس به ربات اضافه شد. 😒 یه سیستم امتیاز گیری واسه جریمه و پاداش و همچنین رنکینگ بازیکنهای برتر بزودی اضافه میشه استارت بزنید تا ربات واستون آپدیت بشه🎈 اگه باگی دیدید یا پیشنهادی داشتین میتونید از بخش دایرکت بهم پیام بدید، بوس بهتون @PlaylabBot
❤65⚡8👾5
بازی پاسور دو نفره و چهار نفره به صورت دکمههای شیشه ای توی بازی پاسور دونفره میتونید انتخاب کنید که ربات خودش 26 کارت اضاف رو حذف کنه و یا خودتون یکی یکی کارتهارو انتخاب کنید یا بسوزونید تا در نهایت ۱۳ کارت داشته باشید، از اینجا به بعد هرکی به ۷ دست برسه برنده میشه🔥 بازی به صورت مینی گیم اضافه شده و نیازی به ادمین بودن نداره و حتی میتونید توی پیوی همدیگه بازی کنید. از الان میتونید حکم رو با استیکر تو گروهتون و …
❤37👾31⚡5
سلام این خیلی باحال بود. میتونین توی مرورگر و بدون نصب، جی تی ای vice city بازی کنین. کلی از خاطراتم زنده شد 🥹 quenq.com/apps/vc-web
👾65❤38⚡10
“True Art”
❤335👾54⚡35
بازی نقطه خط 🤓 روند بازی سادهس کافیه خط بکشی، مربع بسازی و امتیاز بیشتری بگیری و برنده بشی. با هربار ساخت مربع یکخط اضاف دریافت میکنی. ⚽️@PlaylabBot
❤104👾24⚡19
Showing the 12 most recent of 22 posts we hold for @playlabfam. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
@playlabfam edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
We recorded 5 posts on @playlabfam as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.
A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Playlab Fam” (@playlabfam), 51,727 subscribers as measured 4 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/playlabfam.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.