Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Метелкин

Channel

Метелкин

@pluralistpapers

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,184subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001752046436
TypeChannel
Username@pluralistpapers
Created28 August 2023measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live5 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 5 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pluralistpapers

Previous handles

@pluralistpapers was previously reachable at this handle, before switching to its current one. This says nothing about who or what answers at the old handle today — only that this channel no longer does.

@pluralistpapers
held 6 August 20266 August 2026

Growth

1,1681,1841,1766 August 2026 — 1,168 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,168 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,173 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,178 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers19 August 2026 — 1,177 subscribers23 August 2026 — 1,181 subscribers26 August 2026 — 1,182 subscribers29 August 2026 — 1,180 subscribers1 September 2026 — 1,177 subscribers5 September 2026 — 1,184 subscribers6 August 20265 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,166–1,186 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
5 Sept 2026, 11:381,184+7
1 Sept 2026, 19:551,177-3
29 Aug 2026, 22:251,180-2
26 Aug 2026, 16:591,182+1
23 Aug 2026, 07:461,181+4
19 Aug 2026, 08:451,177-3
16 Aug 2026, 18:441,180+2
12 Aug 2026, 23:231,178+5
9 Aug 2026, 23:371,173+5
6 Aug 2026, 19:011,168no change
6 Aug 2026, 18:491,168first reading

Engagement

17 posts held, back to 23 June 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 17 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

465 reactions across 17 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁10121.7%
8618.5%
8418.1%
🔥7516.1%
👍4810.3%
💯306.45%
😱163.44%
🤯102.15%
🤬91.94%
👌40.86%
😍20.43%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 17 of the 17 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 465 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 17 most recent posts we hold, published 23 June 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
2
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 17 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pluralistpapers. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 17 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 23 June 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC257 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Неожиданно для себя нашел в этом тексте место для того, чтобы поработать по профилю — как историк интернационализма. Для перспективы сравнил в паре абзацев внутреннее устройство и принятие решений в спортивной организации ФИФА с МВФ и ООН: «У ФИФА есть серьезное отличие от привычных международных институтов. Для примера: ООН и МВФ живут на взносы государств — деньги идут снизу вверх, и потому вопрос „кто сколько вне

👍8🔥8

4 Aug 2026, 07:48 UTC332 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://t.me/thesisEleven/959 Знаменитые теории среднего уровня, такие как: ну, вы знаете, Путин ведет себя как пацан, поэтому в любой непонятной ситуации он сначала спрашивает «чо думаешь я не перелезу?», а потом перелезает. Жора Крыжовников предупреждал нас уже давно! https://youtube.com/shorts/F9BgC8Sy2gM?is=i586PeMVAq4IOqje А серьезно, если вам не интересна теория, а интересен разбор путинской «кукухи», то ст

🔥8

4 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC324 views8 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Очень толковая иллюстрация того, как выглядят производственные цепочки на примере дронов и почему разные группы российских бюрократов мешают друг другу. https://t.me/ejdailyru/411858

👍8

2 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC609 views41 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Невозможно разделиться на друзей и врагов, если вы не проговорили основания для таких различий. (Буду повторять это рефреном): если у вас нет сообщества, скрепленного общими идеями, нет анализа, исследований, агитации, пропаганды и медиа, то вы просто не понимаете, кто вы, и почему оказались по одну сторону баррикад. И это очень конфликтогенная ситуация, гораздо более опасная, чем мифическая угроза «идеологических ср

22👍8🔥4💯3🤬2😁2

2 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC430 views30 reactionsread 6 August 2026

https://t.me/DespairAndCivism/1071 РАДИКАЛЬНАЯ ДЕМОКРКАТИЯ. ЛЕВЫЕ ПРОТИВ (СО)ОБЩЕСТВА? Прошу прощения у товарищей, что нарушаю установленный порядок проведения дискуссии («в Сигме или на почту»). Напишу по старинке в соцсетях, раз есть запрос на фидбек. Фундаментальная проблема «радикальной демократии» — в радикальной демократии. Общая теоретическая рамка — это суррогат идей философов Эрнесто Лакло и Шанталь Муфф,

🔥2352

2 Aug 2026, 11:23 UTC542 views28 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Меня, как и других антикапиталистических левых, корежит и смешит такая постановка проблемы. Вот здесь в хорошем политфилософском подкасте специально обученные люди с юмором разбирают эти идеи и называют их «соевым Шмиттом», указывая на то, что совершенно непонятно, чего Шанталь Муфф в итоге предлагает? Мы живем в либеральной демократии, где политика толерантна и к капиталистам, и (все чаще) к фашистам. Можете выходит

15🔥63😁3👍1

2 Aug 2026, 07:27 UTC417 views22 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

«Коммерсантъ» в деталях описывает, что произошло с женщиной курьером, которая принесла бомбу в ресторан в высотке на Кудринской. Предположительно, там проходил день рождения главкома ВКС России Александра Чайко. Мясные штурмы, мясные ходячие бомбы — так и живем.

😱16🤬4🤯2

1 Aug 2026, 14:21 UTC457 views19 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Ну что. Кажется, настало время поговорить про радикальную демократию (то есть про слабую и одновременно вредную теорию)

🔥127

1 Aug 2026, 13:01 UTC428 views25 reactionsread 6 August 2026

На этой неделе неожиданно для себя мы узнали, что у коммерциализации футбола есть пределы. Президент мировой футбольной федерации Джанни Инфантино, кажется, взял на себя слишком много. Он захотел создать отдельную компанию, которая взяла бы под контроль коммерческие права на главные турниры планеты (включая мужской и женский чемпионаты мира), и продать в ней крупный пакет (20–21%) частным инвесторам. Якорным инвесто

18👍7

30 Jul 2026, 20:28 UTC513 views59 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

После третьей, четвертой, пятой мировой ядерной войны—короче, любого масштаба апокалипсиса—можно быть уверенным, какие-то вещи в нашей жизни останутся неизменными. Бог послал нам российских либералов, чтобы они своей неадекватностью «заземляли» нас всех в любые времена. Смотришь и думаешь: а, ну эти дураки на месте, значит, живем-живем еще.

😁4212🤯5

29 Jul 2026, 10:19 UTC556 views16 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Как отвечать хейтерам в соцсетях. Инструкция от экономиста Бранко Милановича

😁12👌2😍2

29 Jul 2026, 09:41 UTC601 views36 reactionsread 6 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

2212👍2

Showing the 12 most recent of 17 posts we hold for @pluralistpapers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

DOXA
@doxajournal · 34,171
Telegram ranks this channel #87 of 92 here — alongside 91 others — read 3 September 2026
Профсоюз работников IT
@ruitunion · 35,796
Telegram ranks this channel #90 of 94 here — alongside 93 others — read 2 September 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Метелкин” (@pluralistpapers), 1,184 subscribers as measured 5 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pluralistpapers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.