Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for те самые плюс сайз подборки

Channel

те самые плюс сайз подборки

@plus_size_curvewb

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Advertising · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

59,027subscribers

-1,264 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001880193845
TypeChannel
Username@plus_size_curvewb
Descriptionмаша, шмотки и 3 собаки. WB / OZON / Lamoda / вб 🦦связь @mariagreeeen канал ВК — vk.ru/im/channels/-233346513 канал MAX — max.ru/plus_size_curvewb https://knd.gov.ru/license?id=676f563740af125d6a98ff27&registryType=bloggersPermission
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held33
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/plus_size_curvewb

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 88% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

59,02760,29559,6617 August 2026 — 60,291 subscribers8 August 2026 — 60,295 subscribers9 August 2026 — 60,267 subscribers10 August 2026 — 60,255 subscribers11 August 2026 — 60,277 subscribers12 August 2026 — 60,243 subscribers13 August 2026 — 60,219 subscribers14 August 2026 — 60,206 subscribers16 August 2026 — 60,180 subscribers17 August 2026 — 60,135 subscribers18 August 2026 — 60,090 subscribers19 August 2026 — 60,077 subscribers20 August 2026 — 60,060 subscribers21 August 2026 — 60,043 subscribers23 August 2026 — 60,051 subscribers24 August 2026 — 60,006 subscribers25 August 2026 — 59,976 subscribers26 August 2026 — 59,949 subscribers27 August 2026 — 59,773 subscribers28 August 2026 — 59,785 subscribers29 August 2026 — 59,675 subscribers30 August 2026 — 59,645 subscribers31 August 2026 — 59,604 subscribers1 September 2026 — 59,552 subscribers2 September 2026 — 59,538 subscribers4 September 2026 — 59,478 subscribers6 September 2026 — 59,442 subscribers9 September 2026 — 59,329 subscribers12 September 2026 — 59,247 subscribers13 September 2026 — 59,192 subscribers15 September 2026 — 59,123 subscribers17 September 2026 — 59,074 subscribers19 September 2026 — 59,027 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
33 measurements spanning 43 days, net -1,264. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 58,837–60,485 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 33
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:1959,027-47
17 Sept 2026, 06:5759,074-49
15 Sept 2026, 07:4259,123-69
13 Sept 2026, 18:4159,192-55
12 Sept 2026, 03:1859,247-82
9 Sept 2026, 16:5659,329-113
6 Sept 2026, 05:5859,442-36
4 Sept 2026, 02:5759,478-60
2 Sept 2026, 14:3559,538-14
1 Sept 2026, 17:3459,552-52
31 Aug 2026, 15:4459,604-41
30 Aug 2026, 16:0859,645-30
29 Aug 2026, 18:0459,675-110
28 Aug 2026, 14:5459,785+12
27 Aug 2026, 17:3659,773-176
26 Aug 2026, 15:1859,949-27
25 Aug 2026, 18:3959,976-30
24 Aug 2026, 20:0160,006-45
23 Aug 2026, 04:3560,051+8
21 Aug 2026, 19:5460,043first reading

Engagement

202 posts held, back to 31 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 95 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.91%
avg views ÷ 59,027 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,850
141 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.22%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
143
of 202 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 139 of 141 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 22 September 2026
Posts held202 (31 July 202622 September 2026)
Views total825,037
Reactions total18,187
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken22 Sept 2026, 15:12 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
21,100
Videos
89
Links
3,500

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 22 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
7m 00s
Average length
42s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

29,562 reactions across 198 posts, in 44 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 45.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
13,45445.5%
🔥5,25617.8%
❤‍🔥2,2647.66%
😁1,8666.31%
👍1,1563.91%
🤣7932.68%
💔6912.34%
😍6012.03%
💯5471.85%
🙈2850.964%
💘2740.927%
🤝2330.788%
😭2110.714%
👀2070.7%
🤔2010.68%
🥰1760.595%
🤩1710.578%
😱1500.507%
😨1240.419%
🤯1170.396%
24 further kinds7852.66%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 198 of the 202 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 29,562 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 202 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
26
across the posts below
Posts paid on
11
of 200 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @plus_size_curvewb. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 202 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Advertising

Ad load
0.495%
1 of 202 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
11,100
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
5,970
over 199 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2VtzqxH1NaP113 August 202613 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 202 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

22 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,800 views32 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥24🔥71

22 Sept 2026, 13:49 UTC≈1,820 views25 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

❤‍🔥23🌚2

18 Sept 2026, 22:28 UTC≈9,460 views106 reactionsread 22 September 2026

💔пост для обмена ссылочками

94🍓12

18 Sept 2026, 22:28 UTC≈9,150 views56 reactionsread 22 September 2026

снова воспользуюсь положением в своих целях: девочки, если кто-то из вас репетитор/учитель по истории или обществознанию с опытом подготовки к ЕГЭ 📮 есть вакансии методистов и помощников методистов в онлайн-школу крикните под постом, если интересно, напишем в лс иначе я так и не начну тут постить и умру на работе...

56

16 Sept 2026, 14:39 UTC≈11,000 views256 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

и визуализичино☕️ #журнал

127🔥49😱32😨31💔9😁7🤝1

16 Sept 2026, 14:38 UTC≈9,640 views154 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

плюссайзино луччино💋 #журнал свитер 🔗 ссылка юбка 🔗 ссылка лоферы 🔗 ссылка носочки 🔗 ссылка футболка 🔗 ссылка колье 🔗 ссылка сумка 🔗 ссылка очки солнцезащитные 🔗 ссылка

94🔥38😍12🍓4🙈3😁2💘1

16 Sept 2026, 12:31 UTC≈9,260 views67 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

ой, как хорошо, что в этот раз я не смотрела отзывы на парфюмы ДО того, как сама их попробовала тот, который мне вчера снес крышечку, таааааак разгромили. судя по ним я психичка ненормальная)) ну что, заканчиваем обзор оставшихся 4 ароматов, пока мой блог не превратился в парфюмерный 🪔 JO MALONE Amber Labdanum я не люблю ладан в парфюмах. мне от него плохо, дурно и страшно (в детстве я боялась околоцерковной тема

67

15 Sept 2026, 16:27 UTC≈9,130 views126 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

ссылка на jaket, бренд присылал мне в подарок💙 эх, вот так он должен сидеть… есть вероятность, что тоже окажется на моем сэйле, но пока не могу смириться……

💔6933💘21❤‍🔥3

15 Sept 2026, 16:17 UTC≈9,340 views145 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Photo

у меня эвакуировали машину, а у вас как дела?💀💀💀 вместе с ней эвакуировали и бокс с духами, который я обещала вчера подробно описать… готовы пока только обзоры 4 ароматов, вот их и держите, остальное to be continued😂 дорогой обзор получился. Я КЛЯНУСЬ ВАМ ТАМ РАНЬШЕ НИКОГДА НЕ БЫЛО ЭТОГО ЗНАКА!!!!! паехали MATIERE PREMIERE Metal Lavender мой фаворитище, я клянусь, я беру флакон. сначала подумала, что там что-то

92🤯34🔥13😭41👍1

15 Sept 2026, 10:30 UTC≈9,480 views103 reactionsread 22 September 2026

все я поехала опаздывать дальше, чмок

🥰6131🤪11

15 Sept 2026, 10:28 UTC≈9,720 views70 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

😁5810❤‍🔥2

15 Sept 2026, 10:27 UTC≈9,280 views71 reactionsread 22 September 2026
Video message

Video message, posted without a caption

50😍17👍4

Showing the 12 most recent of 202 posts we hold for @plus_size_curvewb. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 3 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

7 Sept 2026, 14:10 UTCAnonymous Poll550 voters

ну что, носили бы такое?

  1. карди с мехом топ14%
  2. куртки с мехом база25%
  3. шарфы-боа роскошь13%
  4. бахромушки нормик21%
  5. шерлоко-кейпы вау22%
  6. дичь какая чур меня, чур42%

The shares total 137%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

3 Sept 2026, 16:19 UTCAnonymous Poll1,620 voters approx.

читали?

  1. да, интересно30%
  2. смотрю только образы и референсы37%
  3. читаю выборочно29%
  4. а о чем собсна речь?12%

The shares total 108%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

26 Aug 2026, 10:13 UTCAnonymous Poll1,600 voters approx.

гирлз, где покупаем?

  1. сижу на вб72%
  2. выбираю озон51%
  3. ламода родненькая15%
  4. плюссайз магазы6%

The shares total 144%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 202 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 22 September 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“те самые плюс сайз подборки” (@plus_size_curvewb), 59,027 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plus_size_curvewb.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.