Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ТОЖЕ МОГУ +size

Channel

ТОЖЕ МОГУ +size

@plus_size_girl

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

9,710subscribers

-167 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001865900947
TypeChannel
Username@plus_size_girl
Descriptionкрасивые вещи для красивых + связь: @plus_size_good_bot чатик: https://t.me/+TB8MhOYf5vA2YTQy
Created25 February 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live8 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 8 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/plus_size_girl

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

9,7109,9569,8337 August 2026 — 9,877 subscribers8 August 2026 — 9,876 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,856 subscribers14 August 2026 — 9,847 subscribers17 August 2026 — 9,956 subscribers20 August 2026 — 9,939 subscribers23 August 2026 — 9,927 subscribers26 August 2026 — 9,923 subscribers29 August 2026 — 9,921 subscribers1 September 2026 — 9,909 subscribers5 September 2026 — 9,897 subscribers10 September 2026 — 9,872 subscribers14 September 2026 — 9,855 subscribers18 September 2026 — 9,845 subscribers27 September 2026 — 9,827 subscribers5 October 2026 — 9,815 subscribers11 October 2026 — 9,794 subscribers14 October 2026 — 9,777 subscribers18 October 2026 — 9,774 subscribers20 October 2026 — 9,758 subscribers24 October 2026 — 9,750 subscribers30 October 2026 — 9,744 subscribers2 November 2026 — 9,737 subscribers5 November 2026 — 9,727 subscribers8 November 2026 — 9,710 subscribers7 August 20268 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 93 days, net -167. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,673–9,993 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
8 Nov 2026, 16:109,710-17
5 Nov 2026, 11:399,727-10
2 Nov 2026, 12:499,737-7
30 Oct 2026, 19:179,744-6
24 Oct 2026, 04:119,750-8
20 Oct 2026, 18:499,758-16
18 Oct 2026, 01:079,774-3
14 Oct 2026, 22:509,777-17
11 Oct 2026, 18:169,794-21
5 Oct 2026, 11:169,815-12
27 Sept 2026, 15:419,827-18
18 Sept 2026, 13:579,845-10
14 Sept 2026, 01:379,855-17
10 Sept 2026, 08:569,872-25
5 Sept 2026, 08:579,897-12
1 Sept 2026, 21:549,909-12
29 Aug 2026, 16:259,921-2
26 Aug 2026, 10:139,923-4
23 Aug 2026, 15:579,927-12
20 Aug 2026, 12:239,939first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 48 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
26.1%
avg views ÷ 9,710 subscribers
Avg views / post
2,530
8 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
8
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 5 November 2026
Posts held31 (3 August 2026 – 5 November 2026)
Views total20,270
Reactions total939
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken8 Nov 2026, 22:31 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈7,140
Videos
≈2,140
Links
≈288

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 8 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
14m 21s
Average length
45s

Measured directly from 19 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,648 reactions across 31 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,54942.5%
❤‍🔥47012.9%
🔥3429.38%
💔3238.85%
🥰1985.43%
😁1393.81%
💯1183.23%
😭1173.21%
😍892.44%
💘611.67%
👍280.768%
🤗270.74%
💋250.685%
😎250.685%
🙏190.521%
👀180.493%
💅180.493%
🍓160.439%
👏150.411%
🙉120.329%
9 further kinds391.07%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 31 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,648 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 5 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 8 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

5 Nov 2026, 18:15 UTC≈1,250 views112 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Girl in red Кенна Шарп ❤️

❤‍🔥60❤40🔥12

19 Oct 2026, 11:11 UTC≈2,750 views113 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Буквально несколько самых известных плюс сайз моделей, смеюсь

❤83🔥20🙉10

19 Oct 2026, 07:40 UTC≈2,500 views163 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Прешес Ли на подиуме показа Victoria’s Secret 2026

🥰79🔥52❤29😢2💋1

17 Oct 2026, 13:09 UTC≈2,420 views88 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

В этот раз Savage как-то переборщили с ретушью

😭61😁17🍓4💯4❤2

15 Oct 2026, 09:49 UTC≈2,490 views151 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Forwarded from @DialogiorusskoihalturePhoto

Приятная обложка в этой оземпиковой экономике – певица Лола Янг (это которая and I’m too messy, but I’m too fucking clean) для British Vogue. И Гарри Ламберт даже настоящую одежду нашел, справедливости ради не очень много, но и на том спасибо😪

🥰74❤‍🔥45❤24🔥8

13 Oct 2026, 13:06 UTC≈2,660 views124 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Video

Очень хочется спросить, «вас ебёт?»

❤71💯43❤‍🔥9🙉1

13 Oct 2026, 07:35 UTC≈4,060 views83 reactionsread 8 November 2026
Photo

Всегда нравились модели, на показах Рика Оуэнса. Rick Owens Spring 2027 RTW

❤60👏10❤‍🔥9🦄3🔥1

12 Oct 2026, 07:49 UTC≈2,140 views105 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

“Es ist mein Teil” аура

❤64💋23❤‍🔥12🔥5💘1

28 Aug 2026, 15:41 UTC753 views92 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

Сначала натыкаюсь на видео про брафитинг и бюстгальтеры за 25к, потом вижу женщин без лифчиков в легких платьях, много думаю

❤67🔥19😴4❤‍🔥2

27 Aug 2026, 12:38 UTC≈1,130 views121 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Video

💅

❤61🔥33❤‍🔥16💅10🤗1

26 Aug 2026, 06:45 UTC≈1,390 views107 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Клэр Мур и её отсылки к Долли Партон 💔

💔68❤30🙏9

25 Aug 2026, 21:35 UTC≈2,350 views129 reactionsread 29 August 2026
Photo

Спокойной ночи

❤79🥰29💘15❤‍🔥6

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @plus_size_girl. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Стилист для Плюс сайз
@stylist_plus_size · 21,852
Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 47 here — alongside 46 others — read 21 September 2026
ЯНА БАКИРОВА | стиль и любовь к себе
@yana_bakirova · 28,706
Telegram ranks this channel #10 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 8 September 2026
Blue Unicorn
@blueunicorn_ru · 32,998
Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 60 here — alongside 59 others — read 4 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 8 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ТОЖЕ МОГУ +size” (@plus_size_girl), 9,710 subscribers as measured 8 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/plus_size_girl.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.