Channel
@pnegodyay
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
109subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001250743018 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pnegodyay |
| Description | кот в мешке |
| Created | 9 December 2018 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 17 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pnegodyay |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 07:32 | 109 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:10 | 109 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 27 April 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.
21 reactions across 8 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 😁 | 9 | 42.9% | |
| 🫡 | 4 | 19.0% | |
| ❤ | 3 | 14.3% | |
| 🤝 | 3 | 14.3% | |
| custom 5188680072524996250 | 1 | 4.76% | |
| custom 5355256565169396847 | 1 | 4.76% |
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 21 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 27 April 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Re: Don't be a meat proxy On social media, I saw the much more vulgar “Learned engineering just to become the condom between Claude Code and prod” And that (re)framing helped as well to think about the “what are we even (left) doing” as an industry gregsadetsky, 5 hours ago
😁2
https://diataxis.fr/
Re: Diátaxis I urge people to not read this. Once you do, you will see all documentation will as the flawed and confusing mess it is. Ignorance is bliss! Hnrobert42, 21 hours ago
Re: If coding has been solved, why does software keep getting worse? The answer, of course, is that the taste-making apparatus inside the typical tech company is now entirely imposters (non-technical, non-power-users), who continue to LARP as visionaries. The people who notice broken or degraded behavior (devs and power users) and conceive of good designs are not in charge of what goes into the product. So you shou…
Re: IRGC claims it destroyed Amazon's Bahrain data center Despite the destruction, me-south-1 still has more nines than us-east-1 tailscaler2026, 10 hours ago
😁2
Подтверждаю, хорошая платформа должна заводиться с пары строк Например как те, которые писал я 😀
😁2
Re: Good Tools Are Invisible Having designed a good number of internal tools for teams of developers I couldn't agree more. Earlier I had the tendency to "leave the guts" open, thinking my users were developers and would want that. All it did was put obstacles in my teammates actually doing their work. My teammates must use the tools I made for them to achieve work the company needs them to do, they don't want, nor…
Photo, posted without a caption
🤝3
Re: OpenAI Losses Increased Nearly 8X in 2025, with Spending Hitting $34B Sam didn't lie, they are in fact a non profit. aizk, 20 hours ago
Re: You can just say it This quote from the authors friend really hit home with me. > “If you’re going to use an LLM to write me an email, I’d much rather you just send me the prompt; at least then I’d have an idea of what you actually meant to say.” I’m not saying there’s no merit in adding a bit of politeness and professionalism to your communication, which I’m sure the prompt itself lacks. However the root of w…
рип
🫡4😁1
сегодня я завтракал творогом. и так как творог – это продукт, который нужно пережевывать бесконечно долго, думал я о бесконечно многом. вот к примеру AI-мультики о фруктах. мог ли мир просуществовать без них? для начала давайте разберемся, можем ли мы этот вопрос задать. в мартовском выпуске газеты «der freitag», которая выцвела под солнцем на моем обеденном столе, пишут, что никакого мира и «нас» уже нет. что, став…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @pnegodyay. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“пивной негодяй (bribón de la cerveza) ඞ” (@pnegodyay), 109 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pnegodyay.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.