Posted without readable text
🔥7😁3

Channel
@pocketalgofund
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
904subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001737963621 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pocketalgofund |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pocketalgofund |
Crypto & trading — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 81% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 02:19 | 904 | -4 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 06:00 | 908 | +6 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 01:15 | 902 | +2 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 07:22 | 900 | -1 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 17:52 | 901 | -4 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:03 | 905 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 13:13 | 905 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 7 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
486 reactions across 19 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.2% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🔥 | 181 | 37.2% | |
| 👍 | 171 | 35.2% | |
| ❤ | 43 | 8.85% | |
| 🙏 | 40 | 8.23% | |
| 😱 | 9 | 1.85% | |
| ⚡ | 7 | 1.44% | |
| 👏 | 7 | 1.44% | |
| 🤝 | 7 | 1.44% | |
| 🤔 | 5 | 1.03% | |
| 💯 | 4 | 0.823% | |
| 😁 | 4 | 0.823% | |
| 😢 | 4 | 0.823% | |
| custom 5224607267797606837 | 3 | 0.617% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 0.206% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 486 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 7 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Posted without readable text
🔥7😁3
Знаю по себе - когда сидишь в позициях (не арбитраж), то не можешь расслабиться, если нужно отойти от терминала.🤔 Понятно, что если торгуешь - то будь в рынке. Ты же на работе! Но иногда нужно и другие дела делать, а позицию нужно контролировать! Наш привод - LiSA предназначен для операционной системы Windows. Таскать каждый раз с собой ноут - не у всех есть возможность. И мне пришла в голову идея - а что если сдел…
🔥10👏3⚡1🤣1
Video message, posted without a caption
🔥6💯4❤2🤔1
Posted without readable text
🔥12👍7
Хорошо отдохнул - теперь хорошо работаю! 👨💻 Настолько хорошо, что даже руки не доходят пост написать - каюсь..😔 20 июня уехали семьёй в Воронеж и Москву. Поделали семейные дела в перемешку с отдыхом. Заодно и день рождения свой отметил. 🎉 По возвращение в Краснодар меня ждала очень интересная работа по запуску торговых серверов в колокации биржи. Такой опыт у меня впервые, но ничего сложного не оказалось, всё полу…
🔥37👍15⚡1
По сберу сегодня опять набирается позиция.
👍7🔥4⚡2❤1
Вчера поагрессивничал, сегодня фиксанул прибыль. К сожалению на месяц останусь без депозита. Не совсем конечно, чуток останется - на эксперименты. А эксперименты будут с арбитражом.
👍8🔥4
По сберу закрывается сегодня прибыль. В целом - схема рабочая. Продолжаю тестировать дальше.
🔥8👍3
Откопал у себя арбитражного робота, которого писал 7 лет назад! Робот на луа, для терминала Квик. Думаю, надо попробовать что-ли... Поставил погонять на демосчёте - все ок, прибыль есть. Немного докрутил код и вчера поставил на реал. Самый простой арбитраж, где есть деньги и не много риска - сбер и сбер преф. Поставил на фьючи. Доходность за первый же день - 0,45% на задействованный капитал 😳. Сегодня увеличил лотн…
🔥24👍9❤1
Ну что? Всё сначала! Анализы сдал - в норме.😊 Вес частично восстановился. После больницы был 76кг (похудел на 12..). За пару месяцев дома, вернулись 6кг - сейчас 82. Рабочие веса упали в 1.5 раза... Но, куда деваться, начинаю восстанавливаться. Всем хороших выходных!
👍31🔥15👏2⚡1
Хороший день, хорошая стратегия! На днях добавлю кое-что интересное - «не отключайтесь» 😉!
👍13👏2🤔1
Обозначу точку старта. Постараюсь выкладывать почаще. Напоминаю - здесь консервативная стратегия. Ожидаемая доходность около 2% в месяц. Но с этого счета идут оплаты инфраструктуры, о них буду рассказывать, чтобы правильно считать доходность.
👍11🤝3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pocketalgofund. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сергей Усанов | Алгоритмы в трейдинге” (@pocketalgofund), 904 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pocketalgofund.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.