Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PEPE

Channel

PEPE

@podarkipep

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

115,553subscribers

-7,879 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 100,000–316,228.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002359045268
TypeChannel
Username@podarkipep
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 October 2026
Measurements held42
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/podarkipep

Topic

Giveaways & airdrops — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-UD-Q6_K_XL, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 August 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 46% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

115,553123,432119,492.56 August 2026 — 123,432 subscribers7 August 2026 — 123,233 subscribers8 August 2026 — 123,071 subscribers9 August 2026 — 123,189 subscribers10 August 2026 — 122,947 subscribers11 August 2026 — 122,722 subscribers12 August 2026 — 122,561 subscribers13 August 2026 — 122,357 subscribers15 August 2026 — 122,083 subscribers16 August 2026 — 121,427 subscribers17 August 2026 — 121,190 subscribers18 August 2026 — 120,838 subscribers19 August 2026 — 120,600 subscribers20 August 2026 — 120,388 subscribers22 August 2026 — 120,175 subscribers23 August 2026 — 119,986 subscribers25 August 2026 — 119,737 subscribers25 August 2026 — 119,829 subscribers27 August 2026 — 119,893 subscribers27 August 2026 — 119,789 subscribers29 August 2026 — 119,520 subscribers30 August 2026 — 119,388 subscribers31 August 2026 — 119,159 subscribers31 August 2026 — 118,989 subscribers1 September 2026 — 118,892 subscribers3 September 2026 — 118,697 subscribers4 September 2026 — 118,551 subscribers7 September 2026 — 118,196 subscribers10 September 2026 — 117,672 subscribers12 September 2026 — 117,392 subscribers14 September 2026 — 117,173 subscribers15 September 2026 — 118,190 subscribers18 September 2026 — 118,666 subscribers30 September 2026 — 118,241 subscribers5 October 2026 — 117,548 subscribers10 October 2026 — 116,895 subscribers13 October 2026 — 116,240 subscribers15 October 2026 — 116,060 subscribers15 October 2026 — 115,948 subscribers17 October 2026 — 115,844 subscribers18 October 2026 — 115,689 subscribers19 October 2026 — 115,553 subscribers6 August 202619 October 2026
42 measurements spanning 73 days, net -7,879. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 114,371–124,614 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 42
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Oct 2026, 00:45115,553-136
18 Oct 2026, 02:46115,689-155
17 Oct 2026, 02:28115,844-104
15 Oct 2026, 23:06115,948-112
15 Oct 2026, 00:58116,060-180
13 Oct 2026, 20:11116,240-655
10 Oct 2026, 03:57116,895-653
5 Oct 2026, 19:37117,548-693
30 Sept 2026, 05:22118,241-425
18 Sept 2026, 01:59118,666+476
15 Sept 2026, 22:02118,190+1,017
14 Sept 2026, 05:58117,173-219
12 Sept 2026, 13:15117,392-280
10 Sept 2026, 13:57117,672-524
7 Sept 2026, 09:15118,196-355
4 Sept 2026, 14:57118,551-146
3 Sept 2026, 00:35118,697-195
1 Sept 2026, 20:27118,892-97
31 Aug 2026, 23:26118,989-170
31 Aug 2026, 01:36119,159first reading

Engagement

82 posts held, back to 22 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 156 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
7.07%
avg views ÷ 115,553 subscribers
Avg views / post
8,170
25 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.45%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
25
of 82 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held82 (22 July 2026 – 15 October 2026)
Views total204,270
Reactions total2,968
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken18 Oct 2026, 17:49 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
35s
Average length
18s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

10,501 reactions across 81 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.0% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍3,25331.0%
🤨3,13829.9%
custom 53256846845442899882,12720.3%
custom 53123593165802161131,98318.9%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 81 of the 82 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 10,501 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
46
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 81 we hold a reading for · 16%
Most on one post
15
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @podarkipep. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 82 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 15 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Oct 2026, 18:13 UTC≈4,480 views105 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

РЕДО ПОЧТИ 700 GRAM🚀 ~960$…это уже страшно… 🎉ЛУДКА 24/7 🫶PEPE

👍58🤨44custom 53256846845442899883

13 Oct 2026, 17:30 UTC≈5,960 views93 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

🎁КРАФТЫ НА СНУПДОГГОВ? ✈️Репер Snoop Dogg выложил видео в свой Телеграм канал, в котором нам показали самого репера и надпись «Telegram, Round 2». 🎉ЛУДКА 24/7 🫶PEPE

👍58🤨35

13 Oct 2026, 13:20 UTC≈5,860 views95 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

⚫️ REDO ДОСТУПЕН В CHANCE Добавили Resistance Dog ⚫️ в наши игры: Crystals💎, Rocket🚀, Upgrade⬆️ А так же даем +10% к цене от маркета за продажу всех депозитных REDO в Chance 🤩 ⚡Вносите ваш NFT на ChanceGifts ⚡Продавайте и получайте дополнительно от 18 GRAM 🙂 на баланс

👍49🤨46

13 Oct 2026, 12:21 UTC≈6,350 views135 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

Я глазам не верю

👍62🤨54custom 531235931658021611319

13 Oct 2026, 11:16 UTC≈6,360 views119 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

Куда взлетаем? 🎉ЛУДКА 24/7 🫶PEPE

👍70🤨49

11 Oct 2026, 16:38 UTC≈7,090 views99 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

РЕДО ЛЕТЯТ В ЦЕНЕ Минимальная цена на маркете уже перевалила за 300 GRAM 🎉ЛУДКА 24/7 🫶PEPE

👍57🤨41custom 53123593165802161131

11 Oct 2026, 14:34 UTC≈7,160 views116 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Photo

ЛЕГЕНДАРНУЮ СОБАЧКУ REDO КУПИЛИ ЗА 19 233$ 🍷 🎉ЛУДКА 24/7 🫶PEPE

👍71🤨44custom 53123593165802161131

11 Oct 2026, 12:17 UTC≈7,070 views99 reactionsread 18 October 2026

Редо достиг минимальной цены на улучшение - 1000⭐️ Купить звезды с 40% скидкой тут: @pepestars1_bot ⭐️

👍50🤨44custom 53256846845442899885

10 Oct 2026, 19:24 UTC≈7,340 views126 reactionsread 18 October 2026

Как вам улучшения и крафты? Делитесь мнением в комментариях Купить звезды с 40% скидкой тут: @pepestars1_bot ⭐️

🤨67👍55custom 53123593165802161134

10 Oct 2026, 19:16 UTC≈7,340 views123 reactionsread 18 October 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

👍68🤨55

10 Oct 2026, 19:02 UTC≈7,290 views83 reactionsread 18 October 2026

New CRAFTS are available! 🎁 can now be used in crafting. 🎁 Redo Craft: Stickers - Emoji Купить звезды с 40% скидкой тут: @pepestars1_bot ⭐️

👍41🤨41custom 53123593165802161131

10 Oct 2026, 19:01 UTC≈7,080 views97 reactionsread 18 October 2026

На Редо одновременно вышли улучшения и крафт

👍50🤨46custom 53123593165802161131

Showing the 12 most recent of 82 posts we hold for @podarkipep. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

26 Jul 2026, 12:56 UTCAnonymous Poll1,380 voters approx.

На что больше всего ждем улучшений?

  1. 🎁🎁22%
  2. 🎁🎁7%
  3. 🎁🎁🎁8%
  4. 🎁🎁🎁33%
  5. 🎁4%
  6. 🎁🎁47%
  7. 🎁7%

The shares total 128%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 82 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 15 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 17 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PEPE” (@podarkipep), 115,553 subscribers as measured 19 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podarkipep.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.