Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Підслухано в поліції

Channel

Підслухано в поліції

@podslyshenopolice

On this record: Topic · Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

19,523subscribers

+7 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001337194613
TypeChannel
Username@podslyshenopolice
Created25 November 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held34
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/podslyshenopolice

Topic

National news — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 38% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Подслушано в полиции” — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

19,43819,73219,5856 August 2026 — 19,516 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,516 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,493 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,523 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,542 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,535 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,579 subscribers12 August 2026 — 19,610 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,631 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,633 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,645 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,656 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,667 subscribers19 August 2026 — 19,732 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,544 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,574 subscribers23 August 2026 — 19,573 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,581 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,527 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,548 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,569 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,575 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,576 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,574 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,438 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,474 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,483 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,507 subscribers9 September 2026 — 19,500 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,526 subscribers13 September 2026 — 19,562 subscribers15 September 2026 — 19,604 subscribers17 September 2026 — 19,543 subscribers19 September 2026 — 19,523 subscribers19,5236 August 202619 September 2026
34 measurements spanning 44 days, net +7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,394–19,776 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 34
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 14:3819,523-20
17 Sept 2026, 02:3819,543-61
15 Sept 2026, 04:2119,604+42
13 Sept 2026, 12:3819,562+36
11 Sept 2026, 19:3819,526+26
9 Sept 2026, 04:3619,500-7
5 Sept 2026, 19:0019,507+24
3 Sept 2026, 21:2119,483+9
2 Sept 2026, 16:2919,474+36
1 Sept 2026, 14:1819,438-136
31 Aug 2026, 13:5819,574-2
30 Aug 2026, 16:2919,576+1
29 Aug 2026, 20:0319,575+6
28 Aug 2026, 17:5819,569+21
27 Aug 2026, 20:5519,548+21
25 Aug 2026, 20:0819,527-54
24 Aug 2026, 18:5819,581+8
23 Aug 2026, 05:4719,573-1
21 Aug 2026, 20:0519,574+30
20 Aug 2026, 16:2819,544first reading

Engagement

63 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
27.2%
avg views ÷ 19,523 subscribers
Avg views / post
5,310
19 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.871%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
19
of 63 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held63 (31 July 2026 – 2 September 2026)
Views total100,860
Reactions total878
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:15 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23m 05s
Average length
55s

Measured directly from 25 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

3,506 reactions across 61 posts, in 13 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 21.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥75421.5%
❤69219.7%
👍53015.1%
😱36410.4%
😁35710.2%
🫡3419.73%
🤡1985.65%
🎉1042.97%
🤣912.60%
😢491.40%
👎130.371%
💩110.314%
🏆20.057%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 63 of the 63 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 3,651 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 63 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 63 we hold a reading for · 2%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @podslyshenopolice. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 63 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:50 UTC≈3,490 views114 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Оновлення в DeepState

😁99🤡7🔥4❤2🏆1👍1

2 Sept 2026, 15:32 UTC≈3,800 views38 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @liut_npuVideo

Краматорськ. Місто, яке для багатьох із нас стало другим домом! Із 2023 року бійці бригади «Лють» виконують бойові завдання на Донеччині — на одному з найважчих і надгарячих напрямку фронту. За цей час Краматорськ і міста навколо нього стали для багатьох наших воїнів не просто черговими точками на карті. Тут ми живемо між виїздами, повертаємося після бойових завдань, зустрічаємо своїх, п’ємо ранкову каву, бачимо зн…

❤31🔥4🫡2😱1

2 Sept 2026, 09:01 UTC≈5,190 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Ще кадри з місця сутички у Києві, — ЗМІ. На місце протистояння ГУР і СБУ у Києві прибули представники ДБР і керівник ЦСО "А" СБУ — сторони домовились розрядити зброю, щоб змогли розпочатись слідчі дії, — УП

😱17😁5👍2

2 Sept 2026, 08:50 UTC≈4,790 views85 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @BoroshnoNewsPhoto

Між ГУР та СБУ нічого не відбулося

😁76🤡5❤2👍2

2 Sept 2026, 08:48 UTC≈5,160 views16 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Поліція перекрила вулицю Шумського у Дніпровському районі Києва, де відбувається протистояння СБУ та ГУР, пише «Українська Правда». Станом на ранок середи протистояння триває. Джерела УП кажуть про трьох поранених з боку ГУР. На місці "триває спеціальна поліцейська операція". Це якось пов'язано зі зникненням заступника командира з бойової роботи підрозділу ГУР «РДК» Степана Каплунова, додають у виданні.

😱14❤2

1 Sept 2026, 14:23 UTC≈6,400 views48 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Чоловік у важкому стані За фактом ДТП у Кам’янському за участю службового автомобіля проводиться перевірка Попередньо встановлено, що 1 вересня після завершення відпрацювання території району між поліцейськими відділення поліції №1 Кам'янського РУП та місцевими мешканцями виник конфлікт. Один з місцевих мешканців почав бити по службовій машині. Здійснюючи рух заднім ходом, поліцейські допустили наїзд на іншого чол…

👍26😁9😱9❤4

1 Sept 2026, 14:19 UTC≈7,310 views88 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

🔞 Чутливі кадри 📍 Кам'янське, Дніпропетровська обл. На відео зафіксовано, як чоловік ліг під поліцейський автомобіль, поліцейські заднім ходом його переїхали 👍 ПвП

👍43😱29😁8❤4🔥4

1 Sept 2026, 13:04 UTC≈5,250 views63 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @OBiloshytskiyPhoto

Перша постанова від «Фантому» 👮‍♂️ Надходять запитання, хто ж все таки перший був зафіксований «фантомами». Перша постанова, яка була опрацьована системою автоматичної фіксації на фото. Авто Tesla. Порушення швидкісного режиму у місті на 48 км/год. Керуйте відповідально - і "фантом" залишиться для вас просто автомобілем, який проїхав повз.

👍35🤡22❤3😁2😱1

1 Sept 2026, 11:31 UTC≈4,890 views15 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @Khyzhak_brigadeVideo

🚀 Полювання в небі: як знаходять і перехоплюють ворожі БпЛА Пілот підрозділу протидії ворожим БпЛА бригади «Хижак» на псевдо «Наглий» працює на дронах-перехоплювачах. У небі Донеччини його цілі — «Гербери», «Шахеди», ударні та розвідувальні дрони противника. Особливості перехоплення швидкісних цілей, досвід навчання на курсах Навчального центру фонду Сергія Притули та можливості дрона-перехоплювача «Sting» — дивіть…

👍10❤5

1 Sept 2026, 06:16 UTC≈5,210 views26 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Forwarded from @boryspilnewsVideo

💔 Понівечений будинок , згорілі авто ❗️Стали свідком події у нашому місті? Надіслати новину Boryspilnews | Чат Борисполя

😱26

31 Aug 2026, 13:55 UTC≈5,650 views24 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Поліція Рівненщини працює на місці вибуху в адміністративній будівлі райвідділу Наразі відомо про одного загиблого поліцейського. Ще троє правоохоронців отримали поранення. На місці працюють усі екстрені служби. Правоохоронці встановлюють обставини та причини вибуху.

😱23😁1

31 Aug 2026, 09:05 UTC≈5,530 views20 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Video

Обери свою зброю!⚔️ Поліцейські бригади «Лють» — це універсальні воїни, які працюють із різними видами озброєння та техніки. Стрілецька зброя, великокаліберні системи, артилерія, БпЛА — у бригаді є різні напрямки, де кожен може знайти те, у чому буде найсильнішим 🦾 Наша мета доволі проста — знищення ворога у промислових масштабах 🐷 🇷🇺 🔥 ☠️ Долучайся до бригади «Лють». Обирай свою зброю, проходь підготовку та став…

❤15🔥4🤡1

Showing the 12 most recent of 63 posts we hold for @podslyshenopolice. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Коли буде світло? | Рівне Тривога
@rivne_live_ua · 23,316
Telegram ranks this channel #51 of 63 here — alongside 62 others — read 18 September 2026
Hello Славянск 🇺🇦
@slavyansk_hello · 24,892
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 80 here — alongside 79 others — read 15 September 2026
НАЗК
@NAZK_gov_ua · 24,732
Telegram ranks this channel #84 of 87 here — alongside 86 others — read 15 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Підслухано в поліції” (@podslyshenopolice), 19,523 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podslyshenopolice.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.