Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 77% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
11 measurements spanning 42 days, net -35. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,906–2,951 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
18 Sept 2026, 03:16
2,911
-2
13 Sept 2026, 15:18
2,913
-7
10 Sept 2026, 01:40
2,920
-5
5 Sept 2026, 02:41
2,925
-4
29 Aug 2026, 21:25
2,929
-2
24 Aug 2026, 02:25
2,931
-6
17 Aug 2026, 11:08
2,937
-3
14 Aug 2026, 03:37
2,940
-2
11 Aug 2026, 03:35
2,942
-4
7 Aug 2026, 14:18
2,946
no change
7 Aug 2026, 14:05
2,946
first reading
Engagement
14 posts held, back to 17 November 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 14 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
1m 42s
Average length
26s
Measured directly from 4 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
172 reactions across 10 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 43.6% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🤣
75
43.6%
👍
37
21.5%
❤
24
14.0%
😁
14
8.14%
🤯
8
4.65%
🔥
4
2.33%
😱
3
1.74%
🤔
3
1.74%
👏
2
1.16%
💩
2
1.16%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 11 of the 14 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 172 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Advertising
Ad load
7.14%
1 of 14 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
0
none — marked by hashtag only
Median views · ads
2,680
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
2,190
over 13 measured posts
An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.
This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.
Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.
Measured over the 14 most recent posts we hold, published 17 November 2025 to 30 July 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.
Была у меня вчера ситуация: сделала настоящий ковыртач🥲 Приняла можель для отработки техники быстрого airtouch - 14Handtouch и вышло прямо очень убого. Я раньше работала учеником 3 года в самом крутом салоне нашего города, клиентов у меня почти не было. Практика минимальная. Сейчас уже 2 месяца у меня свой кабинет. Работу свою люблю, всё супер. Но этот вчерашний ужас просто выбил меня из колеи. Денег конечно не взяла…
Здравствуйте, такая неприятная ситуация .
Хочу понять кто прав!
Я арендовала помещение небольшое, сделала ремонт на 250т.р.. полностью, стены, потолок навесной, перегородка.
Сама я универсальный парикмахер.
Нашла белую-пушистую в боговерующую маникюршу
Живём в небольшом селе, где все друг-друга знают.
Сама я живу 25км от своего салона. Приходиться ездить на автобусе.
Изначально я маникюрше сказала что аренду де…
КАНИКУЛЫ ПАРИКМАХЕРА В ЯЛТЕ
от международной Академии Красоты Николай Исак
Всё для качественного апгрейда вашего мастерства!
Сбежать от повседневной рутины, погрузиться в обучение и по-настоящему отдохнуть? Всё возможно — и даже выгодно! 300% пользы за одну поездку, ведь у нас действительно всё включено:
Проживание
Трёхразовое питание
Обучение в три смены: выбирайте удобный формат сами
Весь быт на нас: вкусно …
Здравствуйте. Подскажите пожалуйста, хочу обновить достойного качества машинку, триммер и шейвер. Особо на этом не хочу экономить. Рассматриваю фирму Andis, возможно babyliss. Может ошибаюсь в выборе. В дальнейшем хочу заниматься оформлением бороды.
😱Скандальную бьюти-блогершу из Нижнего Новгорода избили в салоне красоты и вытащили за ноги на улицу.
Марина Ильина известна как нижегородский ревизор-разоблачитель. Она наведывается к бьюти-мастерам, тестирует их процедуры, задаёт провокационные вопросы и параллельно снимает процесс на телефон. Потом обзорчики с оценкой выкладывает в свой блог.
В этот раз под её прицелом оказалась владелица салона Юлия, которая за…
Мастера, подскажите пожалуйста. Какие подарочки вы дарите своим постоянным клиентам? Связанными с нашей работой. Если дарить допустим шампунь и кондер по 200мл на каждого клиента, то так в трубу можно вылететь. А хочется мини презентик сделать, чтоб приятно было) Послушаю ваше мнение.
❤3💩2
Showing the 12 most recent of 14 posts we hold for @podstrizheno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Артем Любимов — Гуру Ножниц @artemlubimov · 32,469 Telegram ranks this channel #26 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 7 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПОДСЛУШАНО В ПАРИКМАХЕРСКОЙ” (@podstrizheno), 2,911 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podstrizheno.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.