Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Подвал Пейна

Channel

Подвал Пейна

@podval_pain

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

780subscribers

+32 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001892759655
TypeChannel
Username@podval_pain
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/podval_pain

Topic

Gaming — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7487807647 August 2026 — 748 subscribers8 August 2026 — 748 subscribers15 August 2026 — 752 subscribers28 August 2026 — 755 subscribers3 September 2026 — 767 subscribers11 September 2026 — 780 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 35 days, net +32. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 743–785 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 20:41780+13
3 Sept 2026, 11:41767+12
28 Aug 2026, 03:56755+3
15 Aug 2026, 02:05752+4
8 Aug 2026, 02:01748no change
7 Aug 2026, 17:03748first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 17 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

519 reactions across 18 posts, in 24 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤20739.9%
😁8416.2%
👍7013.5%
🤣417.90%
💘254.82%
💩224.24%
💔193.66%
❤‍🔥132.50%
🔥71.35%
😱50.963%
🤷‍♂50.963%
🎄30.578%
💋30.578%
💯20.385%
😨20.385%
🤓20.385%
🤮20.385%
😘10.193%
😭10.193%
🤔10.193%
4 further kinds40.771%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 519 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 04:52 UTC226 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Люди постоянно крутят шарманку из разряда "А вот раньше (вставьте что угодно) было лучше...". В большинстве случаев это откровенная ностальгия и не более, но в индустрии манги это судя по всему... так и есть? Сами посудите, Наруто — закончился, Блич — закончился (есть шанс на камбек), ВанПис — уже всех заебал. Геройка и магичка — тоже завершены, у Черного Клевера вроде как тоже последний том скоро выпустят. Если чуть…

👍15💘2❤1🔥1

6 Aug 2026, 15:51 UTC272 views22 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Фанаты годами сталкивают различных персонажей друг с другом, а все потому что мы не смогли увидеть их противостояние в аниме или манге. Сегодня я отобрал 5 боев, которые фанаты хотели увидеть, но так и не увидели.

❤‍🔥13❤6🎄3

4 Aug 2026, 18:30 UTC338 views28 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мне опять страйканули видос, причем сделали это не Пьеротты, а какие-то совершенно левые ребята. Написал им на почту с просьбой убрать страйк. Буду пытаться как-то его отбить, жалко терять такой старый видос, ещё и хороший причем.

❤16💔6👍4💩1😭1

3 Aug 2026, 08:35 UTC499 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Утерянные кадры из архива с одним из будущих крупных роликов

😁20💘4💩1

31 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC611 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

❤19😱4🤣3💘2💩1😘1

31 Jul 2026, 07:29 UTC606 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Вот как легко понять, что человек не смотрел ролик

💔13😁8💩2💯2💘1

30 Jul 2026, 20:47 UTC605 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Дочитал вторую книгу. Если вкратце, то вот мои основные поинты — Новеллы хорошие, стиль повествования довольно простой и не переполнен бесконечными метафорами и описаниями всего бесполезного. — Хирузена и Данзо я не понимал и до прочтения новелл, а после так тем более. Данзо вынашивал план с уничтожением клана за много лет до того как это случилось. Он присмотрел Итачи для этого с самого его момента поступления в ака…

❤23👍8💘3💩2🤮2🤡1🫡1

30 Jul 2026, 12:26 UTC520 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Вот он и обещанный ролик. Ролик довольно типичный, но я попытался найти новый подход. Вообщем, что, если бы Тоби оказался не Обито? Каким был бы тогда сюжет аниме и манги Наруто? Смотреть тут

❤12💘3💋1😱1

29 Jul 2026, 07:00 UTC540 views32 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Сколько же я упускаю не кликая на этот ролик...

😁26❤2💋2💘1💩1

28 Jul 2026, 18:48 UTC531 views33 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Прочитал первую книгу. Мнение составлю уже после прочтения второй, но могу вкинуть интересный факт. У Данзо так сильно воняет изо рта, что Итачи чуть не блеванул прям перед ним.

😁26💩3💘2😨2

26 Jul 2026, 10:18 UTC698 views35 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Приехали, мои родненькие

❤30💩2💘1🤔1🥰1

25 Jul 2026, 16:05 UTC721 views43 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мадара: вам клонов с сусано или без? Выбор за вами Каге: ... Гаара: лично мне без сусано пожалуйста Мей: и мне Эй: мне тоже что и им Ооноки: давай ка без сусано Цунаде: согласна! Мадара: что что говорите? Хотите клонов с сусано? Я так и знал! Не зря вас кличут пятеркой каге! Ну, удачи, ребят.

🤣38💩2🔥2💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @podval_pain. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republishes

Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подвал Пейна” (@podval_pain), 780 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/podval_pain.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.