Channel
@pogrebissky_reports
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
621subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001141265240 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pogrebissky_reports |
| Created | 23 August 2017 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pogrebissky_reports |
Memes & entertainment — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 85% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 14:40 | 621 | +2 |
| 9 Sept 2026, 07:58 | 619 | -1 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 11:48 | 620 | -3 |
| 22 Aug 2026, 21:03 | 623 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 05:17 | 624 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 17:33 | 623 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 03:31 | 623 | first reading |
8 posts held, back to 3 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
35 reactions across 4 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.4% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 11 | 31.4% | |
| 🙏 | 11 | 31.4% | |
| 😁 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| 😍 | 5 | 14.3% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 8.57% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Интернет-селебрити и просто люди стали часто использовать выражение «чтоб ты понимал…» На письме выглядит как бычка и наезд, но на самом деле нейтральное выражение. Более приличный и канцелярский вариант с тем же смыслом: «Для контекста я должен сказать, что…» Чтобы ты понимал, это не бычка. Я к этому. Надо тоже так посты начинать. «Чтобы ты понимал…» Ещё формируется такая очень близкая связь с подписчиком, как буд…
❤2😁1
Типичное откровение от известного человека в интернете: вот, читаю хейтерские комментарии, и знаете, самую жесть пишут мамочки двух ангелочков, у которых цветы и рецепты в профиле, как же так. Вот это правда человеконенавистнический взгляд на мир. Дискриминация. А почему у женщины нет права ненавидеть и выражать эту ненависть в интернете, если у неё есть дети. То есть родила — тебе запрещают одно из человеческих чув…
❤9🙏4❤🔥3
«Тюрьма с крокодилами» в Израиле рискует остаться нереализованным проектом из-за решения суда. Создать тюрьму для палестинцев, окружённую рвом с живыми нильскими крокодилами, придумал израильский министр Бен-Гвир, вдохновившись примером миграционной тюрьмы в США. Иерусалимский окружной суд приостановил реализацию плана правительства по размещению живых крокодилов в специально созданном рву вокруг тюрьмы Кециот на юг…
😍2
Уже реально есть такая песня
Вчера был в московском районе Крылатское, рядом с теннисными кортами сидел. Заряд благополучия получил, я не жадный, поэтому делюсь с вами. Значит, сидит женщина. В лёгкой спортивной жилетке предположительно швейцарского бренда On (ещё вокруг очень много было бренда Alo, страна происхождения — США). Разговаривает с мамой. Говорит, еду к подруге на бейби шауэр. Ей купили родители третью виллу на Капри. Что значит отк…
🙏7😁4😍3
Памела Андерсон для австралийского Vogue. 📷 Jamie Heath / Vogue Australia
🙏🏻🙏🏻🙏🏻 📹 papapincus
Просто послушал эти эмоции, любовь к Путину редко принимает именно такую форму. Групповое скандирование его фамилии молодыми людьми навевает ностальгию по «Селигеру» — съезду провластной молодёжи в Тверской области от той же Росмолодёжи. Не факт, что там были аналогичные возгласы, да и участники были немного постарше, но атмосфера похожая. На видео представители — по некоторым критериям — выдающейся отечественной м…
Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @pogrebissky_reports. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Марк Погребисский / Репортажи и просто” (@pogrebissky_reports), 621 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pogrebissky_reports.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.