Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Подслушано Осинники и Калтан

Channel

Подслушано Осинники и Калтан

@poik142

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Referenced elsewhere · Cite this entry

19,812subscribers

+543 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001527636486
TypeChannel
Username@poik142
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 28 February 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live11 September 2026
Measurements held29
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 11 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/poik142

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 99% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

19,26119,81219,536.57 August 2026 — 19,269 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,269 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,271 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,268 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,265 subscribers10 August 2026 — 19,271 subscribers11 August 2026 — 19,273 subscribers13 August 2026 — 19,272 subscribers14 August 2026 — 19,283 subscribers16 August 2026 — 19,282 subscribers17 August 2026 — 19,278 subscribers18 August 2026 — 19,276 subscribers20 August 2026 — 19,284 subscribers21 August 2026 — 19,261 subscribers22 August 2026 — 19,283 subscribers24 August 2026 — 19,289 subscribers25 August 2026 — 19,323 subscribers26 August 2026 — 19,459 subscribers27 August 2026 — 19,498 subscribers28 August 2026 — 19,568 subscribers29 August 2026 — 19,677 subscribers30 August 2026 — 19,695 subscribers31 August 2026 — 19,727 subscribers1 September 2026 — 19,737 subscribers2 September 2026 — 19,758 subscribers3 September 2026 — 19,762 subscribers5 September 2026 — 19,785 subscribers8 September 2026 — 19,794 subscribers11 September 2026 — 19,812 subscribers7 August 202611 September 2026
29 measurements spanning 35 days, net +543. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 19,178–19,895 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 29
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
11 Sept 2026, 05:3719,812+18
8 Sept 2026, 11:3919,794+9
5 Sept 2026, 06:1819,785+23
3 Sept 2026, 12:4219,762+4
2 Sept 2026, 06:3719,758+21
1 Sept 2026, 08:1619,737+10
31 Aug 2026, 07:4419,727+32
30 Aug 2026, 06:3319,695+18
29 Aug 2026, 06:0719,677+109
28 Aug 2026, 03:3319,568+70
27 Aug 2026, 06:1519,498+39
26 Aug 2026, 06:1819,459+136
25 Aug 2026, 07:2619,323+34
24 Aug 2026, 06:3719,289+6
22 Aug 2026, 14:0219,283+22
21 Aug 2026, 03:4419,261-23
20 Aug 2026, 00:3619,284+8
18 Aug 2026, 22:1719,276-2
17 Aug 2026, 20:2619,278-4
16 Aug 2026, 16:0519,282first reading

Engagement

432 posts held, back to 7 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 56 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
9.80%
avg views ÷ 19,812 subscribers
Avg views / post
1,940
340 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.43%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
340
of 432 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 339 of 340 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held432 (7 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total659,855
Reactions total9,442
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 01:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1h 28m
Average length
1m 16s

Measured directly from 70 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

11,258 reactions across 431 posts, in 51 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 13.6% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1,52713.6%
👍1,1149.90%
🔥9528.46%
🤣8927.92%
🤬6575.84%
😨5094.52%
🕊4514.01%
🙏4023.57%
😭3853.42%
😢3813.38%
🫡3252.89%
😱2902.58%
🤯2442.17%
💔2332.07%
custom 53729906053936669342292.03%
🤩2241.99%
💯2151.91%
1791.59%
😐1651.47%
custom 53752242031359503471471.31%
31 further kinds1,73715.4%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 431 of the 432 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 11,258 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 432 most recent posts we hold, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
29
across the posts below
Posts paid on
13
of 432 we hold a reading for · 3%
Most on one post
6
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @poik142. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 432 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 7 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 17:42 UTC≈1,190 views8 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ОТКЛЮЧЕНИЕ ГВС, Калтанский городской округ 🗓 3 сентября с 09:00 до 14:00 📍 ул. Дзержинского, 59, 61, 63, 65, 67, 67/1 Диспетчер ООО «Теплоэнерго» 89050741615 ОТКЛЮЧЕНИЕ ЭЛ/ЭНЕРГИИ 💡 🗓 3 сентября с 08:30 до 17:00, Осинники ул. Победы, 40 с 13:00 до 17:00 пос. Постоянный ул. Дзержинского, 2, 3, 10, 59, 67, 63 (резерв), 65 (резерв) д/с № 15 "Звездочка" (ранее д/с № 7) маг. ООО "Гермес" МКУ УНИ КГО (спортзал) гаражи Шк

4💔21🐳1

2 Sept 2026, 15:06 UTC≈2,050 views79 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⛽️🐻Этой осенью у нас две беды… ФОТО СГЕНЕРИРОВАНО ИИ 📱Telegram 📱VKontakte 📲MAX

😭38🤣19🤪8🤩3🫡3😎32💯2

2 Sept 2026, 14:24 UTC≈2,250 views24 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⚡️ На Газпром только что обновили табло, слился наливник 📱Telegram 📱VKontakte 📲MAX

12👍5🔥41🍓1😎1

2 Sept 2026, 14:15 UTC≈2,270 views63 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

📩📤📥📨✉️ Так ходим за грибами 🫢

🤣36👏11🫡94💘1🤔1🦄1

2 Sept 2026, 13:40 UTC≈2,400 views47 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Готовы? 😃 📱Telegram 📱VKontakte 📲MAX

🤨23❤‍🔥6💯6🤪4🫡41🤔1🤣1

2 Sept 2026, 12:35 UTC≈2,520 views9 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Posted without readable text

👍43🤩1🫡1

2 Sept 2026, 12:17 UTC≈2,480 views13 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🔴 Оперативная сводка по итогам совещания зам.главы с охотсоюзом и начальником управления по защите населения УЗНТ По поручению Константина Коробкина было проведено расширенное совещание с представителями охотничьих хозяйств и начальником управления по защите населения и территорий. Для оценки обстановки группа незамедлительно выехала на территорию Обследованы места прикорма за пределами населенных пунктов. Обнар

6👍5🤔1🫡1

2 Sept 2026, 11:28 UTC≈2,640 views55 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

⚡️ В. Путин назвал «чушью собачьей» слухи о возможной мобилизации после выборов 📱Telegram 📱VKontakte 📲MAX

🤣20🙏16🤬10🤪3👍2custom 53752242031359503472❤‍🔥1🗿1

2 Sept 2026, 10:08 UTC≈2,790 views19 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

⚡️ 17:00: бензин только для организаций. Лукойл пустой 📱Telegram 📱VKontakte 📲MAX

🤨10🤯4💔21😎1😢1

2 Sept 2026, 09:17 UTC≈2,870 views43 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

📩📤📥📨✉️ Товарищи (людям не товарищи, медведям товарищи), кому было жалко медведя, все хорошо, он моими яблоками наелся))) пишите свои адреса - к вам за яблоками приеду)))) Шушталеп, первая Набережная. Снято два часа назад. Всем сообщила, всем пофиг))

😐1713😱3custom 53729906053936669343🤩2😎2👍1🔥1

2 Sept 2026, 09:06 UTC≈2,750 views17 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

🤩 Календарь школьных каникул и праздничных дней от Минпросвещения 📱Telegram 📱VKontakte 📲MAX

👍9👌42🤗2

2 Sept 2026, 08:20 UTC≈1,970 views63 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Forwarded from @poik_42Photo

⚠️ Жёсткие кадры ⚠️ 📩📤📥📨✉️ Ночью пришёл медведь, завалил козу, овечку и барана. Тушки оставил во дворе. Вечером 100% вернётся доедать Экстренные службы в курсе. Будьте осторожны 🙏 📍 Малиновка, ул. Кондомская Барахолка в мах

😭35custom 537299060539366693410custom 537522420313595034764💔32💋1💘1

Showing the 12 most recent of 432 posts we hold for @poik142. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Регион 42 | Кузбасс
@region_42_kuzbass · 40,009
Telegram ranks this channel #34 of 70 here — alongside 69 others — read 30 August 2026
Новости Кузбасса
@kuzbass_news · 43,015
Telegram ranks this channel #82 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Referenced elsewhere

This handle named by sources this register does not control and did not measure — each shown exactly as found, attributed by name, dated to when it was read.

Wikipedia

One Wikipedia article names this handle in its article text, found by searching for a t.me link inside the article source. A citation is a notability signal, not a verification: nobody here confirmed the cited post is genuine or still says what the article quotes. Article text is CC BY-SA 4.0, Wikipedia contributors; snippets below are short excerpts.

Осинниковский трамвай (ru.wikipedia.org)
“…запасных частей, а также острой нехватки водителей{{Cite web|url=https://t.me/poik142/7672|title=Подслушано Осинники и Калтан|website=Telegram|access-…”
read 23 August 2026

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 11 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Подслушано Осинники и Калтан” (@poik142), 19,812 subscribers as measured 11 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poik142.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.