Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for poli .𖥔 ݁ ˖ ᴋᴏнᴋуᴩᴄ

Channel

poli .𖥔 ݁ ˖ ᴋᴏнᴋуᴩᴄ

@poipipoi

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

110subscribers

+11 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003213523865
TypeChannel
Username@poipipoi
CreatedBetween 1 October 2025 and 31 December 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded9 August 2026
Last confirmed live14 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 14 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/poipipoi

Growth

99110104.58 August 2026 — 99 subscribers9 August 2026 — 99 subscribers15 August 2026 — 104 subscribers22 August 2026 — 105 subscribers28 August 2026 — 107 subscribers14 September 2026 — 110 subscribers8 August 202614 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 37 days, net +11. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 97–112 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 09:40110+3
28 Aug 2026, 06:03107+2
22 Aug 2026, 05:18105+1
15 Aug 2026, 20:37104+5
9 Aug 2026, 11:1799no change
8 Aug 2026, 10:0099first reading

Engagement

18 posts held, back to 23 May 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 9 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

502 reactions across 16 posts, in 35 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 9.76% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
custom 5321213842632499812499.76%
custom 5445248868893601143418.17%
custom 5386673628169386831326.37%
custom 5260317215034483937316.18%
custom 5350530417516637237265.18%
custom 5402141901346336243244.78%
custom 5262872965388714770224.38%
custom 5453893328095429797224.38%
custom 5246954407840461926183.59%
custom 5271804083592795795173.39%
custom 5316826348856042416173.39%
custom 5458512492407850966173.39%
custom 5337218351066266838163.19%
custom 5242519708078450147152.99%
custom 5249424125704813012152.99%
custom 5280769467045921341122.39%
custom 5447423681418533421122.39%
custom 5332671307844698245112.19%
custom 5388586851416160482112.19%
custom 527387042671863984791.79%
15 further kinds8516.9%

Custom emoji. Every row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 502 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 23 May 2026 to 9 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

9 Aug 2026, 06:33 UTC28 viewsread 9 August 2026

У меня день рождения через 59 дней что вы мне подарите

Signed Egor Крид

30 Jul 2026, 11:23 UTC180 viewsread 9 August 2026

А кстати. Итоги опроса 16 на 19, так что не продлеваю. Дедлайн все так же 28 31 августа. Простите 16 людей кто голосовал за да

Signed ㋡ поли

30 Jul 2026, 10:32 UTC176 views16 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Цены на бензин упали

custom 52919762736717906488custom 52922495925056084895custom 52921744950024352903

Signed ㋡ поли

28 Jul 2026, 19:54 UTC190 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Ставь лайк если ты тоже долбаёб ебучий

custom 540214190134633624316custom 53123087948799266336custom 53168529905381783755

Signed ㋡ поли

22 Jul 2026, 17:29 UTC280 views9 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Поли почему такая мразь ебанная как ты так ахуительно рисует, мне пиздец нравится твои работы, они невероятно ахуенные, но ты мразь

custom 54474236814185334219

Signed ㋡ поли

19 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC312 views3 reactionsread 9 August 2026

Привет друзья, хочу объявить что у меня давно есть • инфо анал🌀 который по какой-то причине неведомой я вам никогда не показывала Но вот он. Можете смотреть рассматривать чекать чем я таким занимаюсь итд

custom 54474236814185334213

Signed ㋡ поли

1 Jul 2026, 06:20 UTC579 views34 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Я кстати не шутила когда сказала что денди ворлд больше не будет. Но кто сказал что Алиса обязана быть именно в там? Хах.......я такой манипулятор куколд......

custom 524251970807845014715custom 51906753983666090668custom 54696888949601896107custom 54720011679134029594

Signed 𖡎 поли питипиупиу виу виу

22 Jun 2026, 18:59 UTC534 views47 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Решила перезалить всех вместе. Стпвье лайки если ненавидите этих мразей

custom 526287296538871477022custom 528076946704592134112custom 533267130784469824511custom 54700627976331096902

Signed 𖡎 поли

18 Jun 2026, 05:50 UTC573 views27 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Жыробрин

custom 533721835106626683816custom 59560839683181236459custom 53146366113197843451custom 53168529905381783751

Signed 𖡎 поли

11 Jun 2026, 15:12 UTC869 views93 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

ㅤ🎀•🎀🎀•🌟🌟•🎀🎀•🎀 ㅤㅤ ㅤ 🪷•𝒷𝑜𝓃 𝒶𝓅𝓅𝑒𝓉𝒾𝓉🌟 ㅤ🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀🎀 ㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤㅤ🍰

custom 544524886889360114340custom 535053041751663723724custom 545389332809542979721custom 53120556881622067548

Signed 𖡎 поли сиськи суинович

4 Jun 2026, 16:09 UTC707 views65 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Photo

Кто прочитал тот ыживет. Ставь лайк и умреш

custom 526031721503448393725custom 545851249240785096617custom 532121384263249981213custom 54586699502038903179custom 53505304175166372371

Signed 𖡎 поли лорд червей

3 Jun 2026, 13:18 UTC617 views14 reactionsread 9 August 2026
Sticker

Sticker, posted without a caption

custom 53212138426324998128custom 52603172150344839376

Signed 𖡎 поли лорд червей

Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @poipipoi. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“poli .𖥔 ݁ ˖ ᴋᴏнᴋуᴩᴄ” (@poipipoi), 110 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poipipoi.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.