Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for ПОЙЗОН

Channel

ПОЙЗОН

@poizon_app_club

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

54,842subscribers

+13,456 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 31,623–100,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001523474380
TypeChannel
Username@poizon_app_club
CreatedBetween 1 August 2021 and 31 March 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 October 2026
Measurements held39
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/poizon_app_club

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 9 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

39,91954,84247,380.57 August 2026 — 41,386 subscribers7 August 2026 — 41,386 subscribers8 August 2026 — 41,304 subscribers9 August 2026 — 41,271 subscribers10 August 2026 — 41,226 subscribers11 August 2026 — 41,147 subscribers12 August 2026 — 40,842 subscribers13 August 2026 — 40,657 subscribers14 August 2026 — 40,558 subscribers16 August 2026 — 40,319 subscribers17 August 2026 — 40,226 subscribers18 August 2026 — 40,154 subscribers19 August 2026 — 39,919 subscribers20 August 2026 — 40,058 subscribers22 August 2026 — 40,167 subscribers23 August 2026 — 40,560 subscribers25 August 2026 — 40,710 subscribers26 August 2026 — 41,389 subscribers27 August 2026 — 52,566 subscribers28 August 2026 — 52,280 subscribers29 August 2026 — 51,362 subscribers30 August 2026 — 51,128 subscribers31 August 2026 — 50,950 subscribers1 September 2026 — 50,801 subscribers2 September 2026 — 48,791 subscribers3 September 2026 — 48,567 subscribers5 September 2026 — 48,417 subscribers8 September 2026 — 48,248 subscribers11 September 2026 — 47,105 subscribers13 September 2026 — 46,943 subscribers14 September 2026 — 46,671 subscribers16 September 2026 — 46,557 subscribers18 September 2026 — 46,487 subscribers2 October 2026 — 45,278 subscribers7 October 2026 — 43,036 subscribers11 October 2026 — 42,183 subscribers14 October 2026 — 42,804 subscribers15 October 2026 — 44,662 subscribers16 October 2026 — 54,842 subscribers7 August 202616 October 2026
39 measurements spanning 70 days, net +13,456. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 37,681–57,080 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 39
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Oct 2026, 02:4854,842+10,180
15 Oct 2026, 03:0644,662+1,858
14 Oct 2026, 01:1842,804+621
11 Oct 2026, 05:1742,183-853
7 Oct 2026, 00:1943,036-2,242
2 Oct 2026, 04:3945,278-1,209
18 Sept 2026, 16:1946,487-70
16 Sept 2026, 08:1646,557-114
14 Sept 2026, 16:5946,671-272
13 Sept 2026, 05:3646,943-162
11 Sept 2026, 08:1647,105-1,143
8 Sept 2026, 15:2148,248-169
5 Sept 2026, 12:3848,417-150
3 Sept 2026, 16:3748,567-224
2 Sept 2026, 10:3248,791-2,010
1 Sept 2026, 08:2850,801-149
31 Aug 2026, 08:2250,950-178
30 Aug 2026, 08:1351,128-234
29 Aug 2026, 07:1251,362-918
28 Aug 2026, 05:2552,280first reading

Engagement

247 posts held, back to 2 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 140 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
1.50%
avg views ÷ 54,842 subscribers
Avg views / post
825
95 posts measured
Reaction rate
4.26%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
95
of 247 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 93 of 95 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 15 October 2026
Posts held247 (2 August 2026 – 15 October 2026)
Views total78,385
Reactions total3,277
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken15 Oct 2026, 20:53 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 07s
Average length
7s

Measured directly from 10 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

6,610 reactions across 240 posts, in 30 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 50.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤3,35850.8%
🔥98214.9%
👍68910.4%
👏2704.08%
❤‍🔥2583.90%
🥰2293.46%
😁2153.25%
💯1862.81%
🎉1692.56%
😱821.24%
👎370.56%
👌240.363%
🤣180.272%
🙈150.227%
💘120.182%
🥱120.182%
🤝110.166%
😎70.106%
🍌60.091%
👀50.076%
10 further kinds250.378%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 240 of the 247 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6,610 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 247 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
9
across the posts below
Posts paid on
9
of 247 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @poizon_app_club. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 247 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 August 2026 to 15 October 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

15 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTC319 views4 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Poll

Что думаем?

  1. Очень нишево53%
  2. Обычно28%
  3. Как в американских фильмах…41%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

❤4

15 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTC342 views4 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Photo

A$AP Rocky в Париже показал коллекцию своего бренда AWGE 😍 Айтемы из сезона SS27 выглядят очень нишево. С противогазами мы, конечно, экспериментировать не будем, а вот от фиолетового комбинезона мы бы не отказались. Хорошооооо 😎 Коллаборация Puma и A$AP Rocky на ПОЙЗОН: ⚫️ Puma Inhale OG x A$AP Rocky, цена от 24 662₽* *стоимость может изменяться в зависимости от курса и размера 🎫 -500₽ на заказ с сайта/приложен…

❤4

15 Oct 2026, 15:04 UTC674 views56 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Код доступа к скидкам на ПОЙЗОН 🔣 У нас теперь каждую неделю будут новые промики, по которым можно с кайфом обновить гардероб на нашем сайте. По промокоду «ПОБАЛУЮСЬ» скидка 2000 рублей от 2 товаров. Мы бы заказали вот такую пару ⬇️ 🔘 Champion, цена от 3 917₽* 🔘 UNIQLO, цена от 3 144₽* А по промокоду «ШИКУЕМ» скидка 4000 рублей от 3 товаров. У нас вот эта тройка лежит в корзине уже давно ⬇️ 🔘 Under Armour, це…

😁15👏12🥰7🎉5👍5💯5🔥4❤3

15 Oct 2026, 12:30 UTC≈1,600 views209 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Tom Ford слишком нишевые… 🙏 Настолько, что бренд предлагает рвать задние карманы и стилизовать их семейниками. Такое мы даже представить себе не могли 🙏 Торчащее белье, как в нулевых, по сравнению с этим — детский лепет. А вот те самые парфюмы Tom Ford, которые тоже дополняют образ, но не так экстремально: 🔘 Tom Ford, цена от 10 485₽* 🔘 Tom Ford, цена от 12 038₽* 🔘 Tom Ford, цена от 11 589₽* *стоимость может и…

🔥38👍31🎉28👏27😁26💯25🥰21❤13

14 Oct 2026, 18:33 UTC≈2,660 views545 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Классные айтемы, которые доедут до вас быстрее всего 🛴 Потому что они уже на полке! Запускаем еще одну новую рубрику, в которой будем показывать вам наши товары из наличия. Они уже в России, ждут своего покупателя на нашем складе в Москве. Поэтому доставка будет быстрой! 🥳 Сегодня показываем вам классные варианты по обуви ⬇️ ⚫️ Nike Blazer Mid QS UD, 43 EU, 17 853₽ ⚫️ UGG Tazz, 36-40 EU, 12 000₽ ⚫️ UGG Classic…

❤82💯77🥰71🔥66👍64👏64😁63🎉58

14 Oct 2026, 17:04 UTC643 views18 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Sony наконец представили полностью черную PS5 Digital Edition, но… 🥺 Только для Японии. Вместе с консолью выпустят дисковод в чёрном цвете. Его придётся покупать отдельно. PS5 поступит в продажу в Японии уже 19 ноября — в день релиза GTA VI 🙂 Начинаем учить японский… 🎫 -500₽ на заказ с сайта/приложения по промокоду «TELEGRAM» 🛒 Начать покупки на ПОЙЗОН ❤️ — знаю пару слов 🔥 — хотя бы на английском можно

❤10🔥5❤‍🔥3

14 Oct 2026, 15:03 UTC791 views97 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Сильно мы любим читать ваши отзывы 🤩 Вот и сейчас снова этим занимаемся: поглядите, какие топовые айтемы заказываете вы на ПОЙЗОН. Мы и сами корзины пополняем после ваших заказов… 👉 🔘 New Balance XC 72, цена от 6 868₽* 🔘 Nike P-6000, цена от 8 029₽* 🔘 New Balance 9060, цена от 7 621₽* 🔘 Adidas Originals Response, цена от 6 650₽* 🔘 New Balance 530, цена от 6 723₽* *стоимость может изменяться в зависимости от ку…

😁22👏15❤14👍14🎉11🥰10🔥6💯5

14 Oct 2026, 13:03 UTC811 views149 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Покажите нам свои аутфиты и получите за это бонусы 🌟 Запускаем рубрику «Стриткаст»: отправляйте в комментарии свои аутфиты, а мы выберем самые топовые из них и подарим промокоды на следующий заказ. ⭐️ Важный момент: бонусы получат ВСЕ, кто отправит свой аутфит в комментарии, а тройке лидеров дадим еще по 1000₽ на заказ с нашего сайта. 🗓 Итоги будем объявлять в пятницу, так что погнали. Фото принимаем до 10:00 по М…

🎉28👍20👏19😁18❤17🥰17💯15🔥15

14 Oct 2026, 11:02 UTC878 views147 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Подборка UGG на дождливую погоду ☔️ Да, в них можно ходить и при осадках. Ноги в тепле будут, да и стильный аутфит легко собрать. Берем!!! 🥹 🔘 UGG Mini, цена от 12 414₽* 🔘 UGG Tasman, цена от 14 174₽* 🔘 UGG Classic, цена от 14 319₽* 🔘 UGG Neumel, цена от 19 372₽* 🔘 UGG Tasman, цена от 11 982₽* *стоимость может изменяться в зависимости от курса и размера 🎫 -500₽ на заказ с сайта/приложения по промокоду «TELEG…

❤37👏20😁20🥰18🎉17👍15💯13🔥7

13 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTC≈1,520 views258 reactionsread 15 October 2026

Posted without readable text

❤50👏40🔥33🥰32💯31😁26👍24🎉22

13 Oct 2026, 15:33 UTC660 views12 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Как сушить кожаную обувь, если дома только подручные средства? 🤔 Первым этапом всегда очищаем обувь от грязи и протираем сухой тряпкой из ткани. А дальше используем один из годных лайфхаков ⬇️ 🔘 Прогретая соль, сода или рис. Насыпьте что-то одно из этого в носок и вложите внутрь обуви. Меняйте мешочки по мере их остывания. Да… потребуется не один носок. А если вы выбираете рис, то его можно высыпать в какую-то кор…

❤8🔥3❤‍🔥1

13 Oct 2026, 12:34 UTC720 views8 reactionsread 15 October 2026
Photo

Кому New Balance? 🙄 Мы тут опять цены сравниваем… Слушайте, ну разница очевидная — тут даже и комментировать нечего. А эта пара вообще топовая: на повседневку идеально 🥰 ☑️ New Balance 1906, цена от 13 857₽* *стоимость может изменяться в зависимости от курса и размера 🎫 -500₽ на заказ с сайта/приложения по промокоду «TELEGRAM» 🛒 Начать покупки на ПОЙЗОН ❤️ — кроссы топовые 🔥 — экономлю с вами деньги

❤6❤‍🔥2

Showing the 12 most recent of 247 posts we hold for @poizon_app_club. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@poizon_app_club edited 5 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
20 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 October 2026

Polls

The 6 most recent of 8 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

15 Oct 2026, 18:32 UTCAnonymous Poll32 voters

Что думаем?

  1. Очень нишево53%
  2. Обычно28%
  3. Как в американских фильмах…41%

The shares total 122%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

21 Sept 2026, 09:00 UTCAnonymous Poll47 voters

Что скажете об этой паре?

  1. Кайф, носил(а) бы!38%
  2. Слишком нефорско64%

The shares total 102%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

11 Sept 2026, 13:33 UTCAnonymous Poll20 voters

Что думаете насчет новой модели?

  1. Интересно40%
  2. Вроде ничего нового65%
  3. Посмотрю еще поближе10%

The shares total 115%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

24 Aug 2026, 09:31 UTCAnonymous Poll44 voters

С какой парой хотели бы такой элемент интерьера?

  1. Nike Dunk36%
  2. Puma Speedcat32%
  3. New Balance 53030%
  4. Adidas Samba16%
  5. Air Jordan 125%
  6. Другая пара (напишу в комментариях)14%

The shares total 153%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

16 Aug 2026, 09:32 UTCAnonymous Poll26 voters

Что думаете об этой коллекции?

  1. Ничего необычного73%
  2. А мне нравится31%

The shares total 104%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

12 Aug 2026, 13:34 UTCAnonymous Poll60 voters

Подскажите миллениалам: с рюкзаком кто-то в школу еще ходит?

  1. Да, надо же где-то учебники таскать60%
  2. Нет, учебники уже не носим25%
  3. Я ношу ради хайпа, рюкзак у меня красивый28%

The shares total 113%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 247 most recent posts we hold, published 2 August 2026 to 15 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“ПОЙЗОН” (@poizon_app_club), 54,842 subscribers as measured 16 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poizon_app_club.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.