Не упусти свою жизнь.
ИНФОПОСТ — https://t.me/pokoi_botinka/171
TikTok: @mark_is_noisy
Также публикуюсь на Ютубе и Пинтересте.
В ЛС писать только по поводу заказов.
Created
Between 1 November 2023 and 30 April 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
Personal blog — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 44% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.
Growth
25 measurements spanning 90 days, net -484. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,461–8,091 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
6 Nov 2026, 16:10
7,534
-18
3 Nov 2026, 23:16
7,552
-17
1 Nov 2026, 09:16
7,569
-12
29 Oct 2026, 18:46
7,581
-8
27 Oct 2026, 02:06
7,589
-15
23 Oct 2026, 22:20
7,604
-8
20 Oct 2026, 20:05
7,612
-14
17 Oct 2026, 21:31
7,626
-15
15 Oct 2026, 06:56
7,641
-12
12 Oct 2026, 08:16
7,653
-40
5 Oct 2026, 06:17
7,693
-43
26 Sept 2026, 21:17
7,736
-54
17 Sept 2026, 20:38
7,790
-16
13 Sept 2026, 14:00
7,806
-17
9 Sept 2026, 21:59
7,823
-28
4 Sept 2026, 04:17
7,851
-19
31 Aug 2026, 11:19
7,870
-18
28 Aug 2026, 09:13
7,888
-20
25 Aug 2026, 03:53
7,908
-27
21 Aug 2026, 17:06
7,935
first reading
Engagement
12 posts held, back to 21 July 2025 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 22 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 12 posts for this entry, the most recent from 12 October 2025. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Photos
755
Videos
16
Links
147
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 7 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Reaction mix
22,573 reactions across 12 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
❤
14,759
65.4%
❤🔥
3,670
16.3%
custom 5305794343104177826
2,223
9.85%
custom 5467923066401088821
1,008
4.47%
🤯
369
1.63%
😢
308
1.36%
🍌
112
0.496%
💔
99
0.439%
🤔
25
0.111%
Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 12 of the 12 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 22,573 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 12 most recent posts we hold, published 21 July 2025 to 12 October 2025, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Telegram Stars
Stars received
2,060
across the posts below
Posts paid on
12
of 12 we hold a reading for · 100%
Most on one post
645
single highest reading
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pokoi_botinka. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 12 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 21 July 2025 to 12 October 2025. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
🎉 Вот и наступил мой 20-й День Рождения, юбилей получается.
Сказать честно, для меня это так необычно, что уже третий десяток пошёл.
Безумно рад видеть ваши поздравления, пожелания и арты! Спасибо всем и спасибо, что продолжаете следить за моим творчеством!
Если захотите поздравить финансово — https://boosty.to/botinok_ddd/donate
#ДР
#арт_ботинка
#oc
Инфопост |
Донат | Фанарты
НАС ✅✅ ✅ !
Даже не верится, что в ТГК стукнуло такое число. Очень рад, что вы подписываетесь сюда и следите за выходом артов и т.п. Всем огромное спасибо за активность и ожидания! В скором времени я планирую масштабные изменения, а по поводу комментариев в этом канале скажу то, что они появятся, когда я найду активных модераторов. 🫥
Я очень благодарен вам за поддержку и помощь. Приятно видеть добрые и поддерживающи…
❗СРОЧНО❗
Это связано с ТИКТОКОМ
Не так давно в ТикТоке появился странный аккаунт, который ворует и выкладывает МОИ видео. Мне часто стали поступать об этом сообщения и я потом сам нашёл данный аккаунт.
Убедительная просьба — накидайте жалоб на этот аккаунт. Не пишите никаких комментариев. Чем больше жалоб будет, тем выше вероятность, что этот аккаунт забанят. Важна поддержка каждого из вас, потому что ТикТок уже не…
Попробовал нарисовать портрет Кан Сэ Бёк левой рукой. Первый такой experience. Буду дальше практиковаться. 💃
#арт_ботинка
#squidgame
Инфопост |
Донат | Фанарты
Showing the 12 most recent of 12 posts we hold for @pokoi_botinka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
Марко @markoacademy · 20,005 Telegram ranks this channel #16 of 71 here — alongside 70 others — read 27 September 2026
Reference | Рисование @reference_st · 20,267 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 65 here — alongside 64 others — read 26 September 2026
✌️ ЮКАН ✌️ @yu6_6kan · 93,905 Telegram ranks this channel #43 of 58 here — alongside 57 others — read 15 August 2026
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 November 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“покои ботинка 🌱” (@pokoi_botinka), 7,534 subscribers as measured 6 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pokoi_botinka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.