Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Ⲡⲟⲗⲉⳅⲏⲟ

Channel

Ⲡⲟⲗⲉⳅⲏⲟ

@poleezno

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

2,996subscribers

+16 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001888989531
TypeChannel
Username@poleezno
CreatedBetween 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/poleezno

Growth

2,9803,0052,992.56 August 2026 — 2,980 subscribers7 August 2026 — 2,985 subscribers10 August 2026 — 2,989 subscribers13 August 2026 — 2,982 subscribers16 August 2026 — 2,986 subscribers19 August 2026 — 2,994 subscribers23 August 2026 — 2,997 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,005 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,003 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,001 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,996 subscribers2,9966 August 20266 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 30 days, net +16. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,976–3,009 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 03:402,996-5
1 Sept 2026, 17:033,001-2
29 Aug 2026, 15:173,003-2
26 Aug 2026, 19:533,005+8
23 Aug 2026, 14:072,997+3
19 Aug 2026, 13:452,994+8
16 Aug 2026, 17:362,986+4
13 Aug 2026, 09:062,982-7
10 Aug 2026, 04:442,989+4
7 Aug 2026, 13:302,985+5
6 Aug 2026, 22:022,980first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 15 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 3 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
8m 18s
Average length
1m 23s

Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

301 reactions across 20 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 63.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍19263.8%
💯7123.6%
🤝247.97%
🔥134.32%
👎10.332%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 301 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 20 we hold a reading for · 5%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @poleezno. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 20 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

5 Aug 2026, 15:12 UTC192 views4 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @BLAGOE_SLOV0Photo

🆕🌐ОТКРЫТ НАБОР НА ОСЕННИЕ КУРСЫ В ЛУЧЕЗАРНОЙ МЕДИНЕ🌐 С радостью сообщаем о начале записи на осенние образовательные курсы для мальчиков от 15 лет 🕌Место проведения: Пророческая Медина ⌛️Продолжительность: 2,5 месяца В программе курсов: 📕Изучение и заучивание Корана, индивидуальный подход к каждому.Если ребенок не умеет читать, то мы его научим. 🌍 Арабский язык 🌴 Основы религии и воспитания 👥 Кураторами и учите

👍4

2 Aug 2026, 23:50 UTC458 views5 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @salehalswayehVideo

سيرة ذاتية #ترجمة_روسية

👍3🤝2

2 Aug 2026, 23:03 UTC461 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

❗️Прекрасный пример шейха для тех, кто любит лезть в чужие семья или раздавать советы, которые вредят больше чем приносят пользу. 🎙Чтец: Уважаемый шейх, да содействует вам Аллах. Спрашивающая говорит: Её муж против того, чтобы отпускать её одну с дочерьми на рынок для покупки необходимых вещей. Является ли это излишней строгостью или проявлением плохого сомнения, из-за того что он не отпускает её одну? Шейх: «Мы н

👍6🤝1

2 Aug 2026, 22:13 UTC431 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

🎙Чтец: Уважаемый шейх, да содействует вам Аллах, семье поступила сумма в качестве милостыни, и вопрос в том, обязана ли жена сообщить мужу о том, что им дали эти деньги ? И может ли она распорядиться этими деньгами без ведома вообще мужа ? Ответ: «Муж является расходующим, и не позволительно жене брать закят (милостыню) без разрешения мужа, поскольку расходующим (обеспечивающим) является сам муж, и он является попеч

👍7💯7🔥2🤝1

2 Aug 2026, 13:43 UTC563 views23 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

➡️Спрашивающий: Дозволяется ли молиться позади рафидита? Шейх : «Нет. Если ты узнал, что он рафидит, то нельзя». Спрашивающий: Нельзя да шейх ? Шейх: «Да». Спрашивающий: Если случилось так, что человек помолился за имамом, затем после молитвы обнаружилось, что он рафидит? Шейх: «Переделывает». Спрашивающий: Переделывает молитву ? Шейх: «Да». Спрашивающий: Даже если будет из слепо следующих рафидитам а не из и

👍21🤝2

31 Jul 2026, 19:19 UTC≈1,300 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

Чтец: Задающий вопрос говорит: Уважаемый шейх, да содействует вам Аллах, у меня есть семилетний сын, я хочу его воспитать, хорошим исламским воспитанием, однако шейх, он просит меня купить ему приставку, как: Плестейшен, Сони ? Шейх: «Я не знаю что это, что это означает ? Переведи. (Объясни)». Чтец: Компьютерные игры… Шейх: «В них есть что-то запретное?» Чтец: В некоторых играх могут быть изображения женщин, в н

👍12🔥5💯1🤝1

31 Jul 2026, 18:16 UTC660 views12 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Video

«Ашариты... Между ашаритами и теми, кто имеет убеждения саляф, постоянное сражение и дискуссии во все времена. Они не хотят находиться в ряду саляфитов, то есть с теми, кто имеет убеждение саляф, и наряду с этим, они всегда и везде ведут сражение против них. Это явный и очевидный признак, и то, как они поступили с шейх уль-Исламом ибн Таймией и с ибн аль-Кайимом, тому свидетельствует. Они никогда не допустят то, чтоб

💯8🔥2👎1🤝1

27 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTC866 views25 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Стоит ли провести эфир на тему: Семейного права, выбора супруга(и), тайные браки, ну и в целом права мужа и жены, и на чём семья должна строиться.

  1. Да91%
  2. Нет9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍12💯7🔥4🤝2

26 Jul 2026, 13:51 UTC719 views13 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @umarabulhasanPhoto

🇸🇦Что такое ихляс? 🇸🇦 Отвечает муфтий КСА шейх Салих ибн Фавзан аль-Фавзан, да сохранит его Аллах: «Аль-Ихляс (искренность) — это единение Аллаха в обращении и намерении наряду с отречением от многобожников». См.: «Ат-Таълик аль-мухтасар а’ля куррати уйуниль муваххидин»: (112 стр.).

👍12🤝1

25 Jul 2026, 23:53 UTC717 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mysliperom

Представь, брат мой, ты призываешь людей к единобожию, однако Аллах не дарует тебе победы и содействия в этом деле, а напротив, сделает так, что многобожники возьмут верх над тобой в то время, когда ты являешься единобожником и приближенным к Аллаху. И ведь если такое произойдет, то это либо может быть испытанием от Аллаха, как подвергались подобному испытанию и пророки, мир им, либо результатом твоих грехов и непосл

💯17👍9🤝4

22 Jul 2026, 21:42 UTC869 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026

اللهم ألف بين قلوبنا وأصلح ذات بيننا واهدنا سبل السلام ونجنا من الظلمات إلى النور وجنبنا الفواحش ما ظهر منها وما بطن وبارك لنا في أسماعنا وأبصارنا وقلوبنا وأزواجنا وذرياتنا وتب علينا إنك أنت التواب الرحيم واجعلنا شاكرين لنعمك مثنين بها عليك، قابلين لها وأتممها علينا يا رب العالمين.

👍7

22 Jul 2026, 21:35 UTC805 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Forwarded from @mysliperom

Слыша и видя, как между мусульманами происходит смута, открываются двери зла, через которые к ним заходят такие гости, как зависть, злорадство и гордыня, не говоря уже о злословии, предательстве и лжи. Хочу озвучить свою мысль: Помогай своему брату-сунниту, даже если он грешен, и радуйся за него, испрашивая благодати в его делах у Господа Великого. Пусть зависть и злоба овладевают людьми неверия и ереси, видя, как а

👍17🤝1

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @poleezno. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

27 Jul 2026, 12:46 UTCAnonymous Poll161 voters

Стоит ли провести эфир на тему: Семейного права, выбора супруга(и), тайные браки, ну и в целом права мужа и жены, и на чём семья должна строиться.

  1. Да91%
  2. Нет9%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 15 July 2026 to 5 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 4 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Институт «Дироя» | معهد الدراية
@Diroya · 48,257
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 26 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Ⲡⲟⲗⲉⳅⲏⲟ” (@poleezno), 2,996 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poleezno.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.