Channel
@polemia_fr
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
1,003subscribers
-4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001440771854 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @polemia_fr |
| Created | 14 September 2019 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 4 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 9 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 4 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/polemia_fr |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 4 Sept 2026, 18:14 | 1,003 | +1 |
| 1 Sept 2026, 05:14 | 1,002 | +1 |
| 26 Aug 2026, 15:43 | 1,001 | +1 |
| 23 Aug 2026, 06:42 | 1,000 | -4 |
| 19 Aug 2026, 08:04 | 1,004 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 09:14 | 1,005 | -1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 03:02 | 1,006 | -1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 20:02 | 1,007 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 19:52 | 1,007 | first reading |
20 posts held, back to 1 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
49 reactions across 14 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 32 | 65.3% | |
| 🔥 | 11 | 22.4% | |
| 💯 | 6 | 12.2% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 49 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 1 July 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Une « mesure de la France » en 2026 Avant la présidentielle de 2027, Didier Husson entreprend de « poser des balises pour éclairer le chemin » menant à un sursaut du pays. ➡ https://www.polemia.com/une-mesure-de-la-france-en-2026/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
👍1
Présidentielle 2027 : radioscopie d’un piège à cons Et si la présidentielle se jouait après l’élection avec une stratégie du chaos savamment orchestrée par le macronisme ? ➡ https://www.polemia.com/presidentielle-2027-radioscopie-dun-piege-a-cons/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
🔥5
Les origines de la division sexuelle du travail au miroir de la science « Pourquoi, partout autour du globe, et pendant des millénaires, sont-ce essentiellement les hommes qui ont été chargés de la chasse et de la guerre, et les femmes de la gestion du foyer ? » ➡ https://www.polemia.com/les-origines-de-la-division-sexuelle-du-travail-au-miroir-de-la-science/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
👍2
La techno-négativité ou le refus de l’avenir « L’automatisation pourrait offrir à l’Europe une autre réponse au vieillissement démographique que le recours perpétuel à l’immigration. » ➡ https://www.polemia.com/la-techno-negativite-ou-le-refus-de-lavenir/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
👍3🔥3
Loi Falorni : après les enfants, les Frères s’attaquent aux grands-parents De la contraception à l’euthanasie, Camille Galic retrace l’influence des réseaux maçonniques dans les grandes réformes sociétales. ➡ https://www.polemia.com/loi-falorni-apres-les-enfants-les-freres-sattaquent-aux-grands-parents/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
👍1
Barbara Butch et le retour de la censure vertueuse « Le boycott de Barbara Butch constitue le retour de flamme d’un système d’exclusion longtemps appliqué dans l’indifférence à la droite. » ➡ https://www.polemia.com/barbara-butch-et-le-retour-de-la-censure-vertueuse/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
🔥3
🎞 Christopher Nolan qui vient de réaliser l'Odyssée pour le cinéma fait actuellement polémique en Europe, notamment pour des choix de casting très hasardeux. Mais au-delà d'une volonté manifeste de souiller une œuvre majeure de notre patrimoine, le réalisateur anglais a-t-il respecté la lettre et l’esprit de l’Odyssée d’Homère dans son adaptation cinématographique ? Olivier Battistini, historien et philosophe du po…
💯4
Avant 2027, quelques considérations sur la situation politique de la France À l’approche de la présidentielle de 2027, la France fait face à de profondes incertitudes politiques. Analyse de Michel Leblay. ➡ https://www.polemia.com/avant-2027-quelques-considerations-sur-la-situation-politique-de-la-france/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
Réflexions sur la liberté de pensée, par Pierre de Meuse La France sombre dans une société de contrôle. Pierre de Meuse, essayiste et docteur en droit, analyse cette dérive liberticide. ➡ https://www.polemia.com/reflexions-sur-la-liberte-de-pensee-par-pierre-de-meuse/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
👍3
Marine Le Pen : stratégie risquée et épée de Damoclès « Le pari est risqué. Marine Le Pen est condamnée à une stratégie antisystème, loin de celle de la dédiabolisation. » ➡ https://www.polemia.com/marine-le-pen-strategie-risquee-et-epee-de-damocles/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
👍1
Agatha Christie, indubitablement réactionnaire La réédition de l’ouvrage de Camille Galic sur l’« indétronable impératrice du crime » nous invite à relever quelques aspects politiques et culturels exprimés dans son œuvre. ➡ https://www.polemia.com/agatha-christie-indubitablement-reactionnaire/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
👍1
Les 50 mesures qui ont coulé la France depuis 50 ans Comment la France est passée d’une nation prospère et souveraine à un pays au bord de la rupture ? L’Institut Thomas-More tente de répondre à cette question. ➡ https://www.polemia.com/les-50-mesures-qui-ont-coule-la-france-depuis-50-ans/ S'abonner à Polémia sur Telegram : @polemia_fr
👍1
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @polemia_fr. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 4 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Polémia” (@polemia_fr), 1,003 subscribers as measured 4 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polemia_fr.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.