Channel
@polina_repetitor
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
884subscribers
-28 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001696947571 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @polina_repetitor |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 16 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 16 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/polina_repetitor |
Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Sept 2026, 07:40 | 884 | -3 |
| 8 Sept 2026, 03:01 | 887 | -3 |
| 30 Aug 2026, 22:25 | 890 | -4 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 10:33 | 894 | -2 |
| 16 Aug 2026, 18:05 | 896 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 14:09 | 911 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:02 | 912 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 18:12 | 912 | first reading |
16 posts held, back to 12 March 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
37 reactions across 10 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 70.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 26 | 70.3% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 13.5% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 13.5% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 2.70% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 16 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 37 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Открываю набор в группы на новый учебный год 🍂 Это два разных курса, у каждого - своя программа: 📕 «ЕГЭ на 100» — 11 класс. Вся тестовая часть + сочинение (задание 27) в течение всего года. 📗 «ОГЭ на 5» — 9 класс. Вся тестовая часть + изложение (до Нового года) и сочинение (после). Как проходят занятия: теория → сразу практика на неё → снова теория → снова практика. Я объясняю правило — и тут же отрабатываем его…
Сегодня мне 2️⃣9️⃣ Год был очень разным. Я выпустила одиннадцатый поток: мои ребята сдали экзамены и разъехались по вузам и колледжам. Многое в этом году я изменила. Переехала, завела собаку, частично сменила круг общения. К концу учебного года как обычно выгорела. И на три месяца замолчала здесь, в канале. А сейчас впервые за долгое время я действительно отдохнула и чувствую спокойствие. Понимаю, чего хочу от но…
❤7🔥2
11 лет. 11 выпусков. Показываю результаты июня – все, а не только «красивые» 😄 Этим летом я выпустила своих одиннадцатых. И решила показать баллы этого июня полностью — без отбора, который обычно делают другие. ЕГЭ: ▪️ 94, 89, 83 – системная работа в течение года ▪️ 78 – крепкий результат ▪️ 69 – планировал 70. Почти снайпер 😁 ▪️ 63 – а вот здесь я была уверена в 98+. Экзамен – это ещё и нервы, и один неудачный ден…
Video message, posted without a caption
❤3
Video message, posted without a caption
❤2
Что писать в комментарии в сочинении ЕГЭ? Комментарий - это самая ценная часть сочинения, за которую можно получить сразу 3 балла. Вот из чего он должен состоять: 🔹 Пример-иллюстрация 1 из текста + пояснение - 1 балл Вы берёте конкретный эпизод, мысль или ситуацию из текста и объясняете, какую роль он играет в раскрытии проблемы. Важно не просто пересказать, а показать смысл. 🔹 Пример-иллюстрация 2 из текста + поя…
👍4❤2🤯1
Можно ли пользоваться любыми клише или только теми, что дал учитель? Вопрос от участницы мини-курса «Сочинение ЕГЭ». Да, можно. В критериях ничего не сказано о конкретных клише, поэтому пользоваться можно любыми ☺️ Просто учителю, видимо, так проще. Мои сочинения писать по любым клише, в том числе которые дал учитель, чтобы не путаться потом :) Успевайте присоединиться к мини-курсам «Сочинение ЕГЭ» или «Изложени…
Записала первые уроки по мини-курсам «Сочинение ЕГЭ» и «Изложение + сочинение ОГЭ» и уже отправила всем, кто записался 😇 Успевайте присоединиться, экзамены не за горами 🌸 Подробную программу мини-курсов и стоимость можно посмотреть ЗДЕСЬ. 💬 Чтобы скорее получить запись первого урока, напишите мне @polina_andr_repetitor.
❤2👍1
Video message, posted without a caption
❤1
80% учеников теряют здесь баллы Найдите предложение с логической ошибкой, где объём есть, а смысла нет:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Потренируемся искать логические ошибки в сочинениях? Найдите “провал” в тексте:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Разберём логические ошибки в сочинении, список которых используют эксперты ЕГЭ/ОГЭ при проверке (часть 1) Найдите, есть ли у вас такие 👇 ❌ Отсутствие завершённой мысли Например: «В предложении 24 автор говорит.» 📌 мысль обрывается на полуслове → эксперт просто не понимает, что вы хотели сказать ❌ Наличие не связанных между собой мыслей Например: "Очень сложно человеку сделать выбор. Выбор может быть разным. При…
❤2
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @polina_repetitor. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
80% учеников теряют здесь баллы Найдите предложение с логической ошибкой, где объём есть, а смысла нет:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Потренируемся искать логические ошибки в сочинениях? Найдите “провал” в тексте:
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 16 most recent posts we hold, published 12 March 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Репетитор по русскому языку | ЕГЭ ОГЭ 👩🏼🏫” (@polina_repetitor), 884 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polina_repetitor.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.