Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for полины тут нет

Channel

полины тут нет

@polintytnet

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Declared links · Cite this entry

2,024subscribers

-21 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001278149594
TypeChannel
Username@polintytnet
Created17 June 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live6 September 2026
Measurements held10
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 6 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/polintytnet

Growth

2,0242,0472,035.58 August 2026 — 2,045 subscribers8 August 2026 — 2,045 subscribers14 August 2026 — 2,046 subscribers17 August 2026 — 2,047 subscribers20 August 2026 — 2,046 subscribers24 August 2026 — 2,042 subscribers27 August 2026 — 2,040 subscribers30 August 2026 — 2,036 subscribers2 September 2026 — 2,034 subscribers6 September 2026 — 2,024 subscribers8 August 20266 September 2026
10 measurements spanning 29 days, net -21. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,021–2,050 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
6 Sept 2026, 19:162,024-10
2 Sept 2026, 00:362,034-2
30 Aug 2026, 05:372,036-4
27 Aug 2026, 06:542,040-2
24 Aug 2026, 09:332,042-4
20 Aug 2026, 06:452,046-1
17 Aug 2026, 16:262,047+1
14 Aug 2026, 18:062,046+1
8 Aug 2026, 09:122,045no change
8 Aug 2026, 08:302,045first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

237 reactions across 8 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 44.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
💘10644.7%
custom 523557851264713477010042.2%
custom 5377316444914599275239.70%
custom 545860212837529097283.38%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 8 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 237 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

7 Aug 2026, 01:11 UTC507 views19 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

💘14custom 54586021283752909725

3 Aug 2026, 16:02 UTC≈1,270 views2 reactionsread 8 August 2026

друзья айтишники, если тут такие есть, вопрос к вам! мой друг ищет вакансию software developer (бек/фронт/qa), если у вас в компании есть вакансии на эту должность - отпишите, пожалуйста, мне в личку @oopshii

custom 52355785126471347702

29 Jul 2026, 17:10 UTC≈1,450 views65 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

🥺

custom 523557851264713477050💘15

29 Jul 2026, 15:38 UTC≈1,270 views18 reactionsread 8 August 2026

всем спасибо за просмотр, приходите на съемки 🤍 запись, как всегда, тут - @oopshii

custom 523557851264713477018

29 Jul 2026, 15:37 UTC≈1,080 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

before/after part 4

custom 523557851264713477030

29 Jul 2026, 14:43 UTC928 views34 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

before/after part 3

💘31custom 54586021283752909723

29 Jul 2026, 13:43 UTC816 views40 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

before/after part 1

custom 537731644491459927523💘17

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @polintytnet. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“полины тут нет” (@polintytnet), 2,024 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polintytnet.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.