Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Утенок Пол Пота

Channel

Утенок Пол Пота

@polpotkids

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

6,475subscribers

+65 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001719039797
TypeChannel
Username@polpotkids
Created22 January 2022measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged2 times, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/polpotkids

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 45% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

6,3876,4756,4316 August 2026 — 6,410 subscribers6 August 2026 — 6,410 subscribers15 August 2026 — 6,387 subscribers17 August 2026 — 6,466 subscribers20 August 2026 — 6,473 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,475 subscribers26 August 2026 — 6,462 subscribers29 August 2026 — 6,452 subscribers2 September 2026 — 6,445 subscribers6 September 2026 — 6,447 subscribers11 September 2026 — 6,456 subscribers14 September 2026 — 6,475 subscribers6 August 202614 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 40 days, net +65. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 6,374–6,488 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
14 Sept 2026, 16:176,475+19
11 Sept 2026, 03:006,456+9
6 Sept 2026, 13:406,447+2
2 Sept 2026, 02:046,445-7
29 Aug 2026, 15:336,452-10
26 Aug 2026, 22:566,462-13
24 Aug 2026, 03:536,475+2
20 Aug 2026, 19:246,473+7
17 Aug 2026, 20:356,466+79
15 Aug 2026, 02:536,387-23
6 Aug 2026, 03:206,410no change
6 Aug 2026, 00:566,410first reading

Engagement

28 posts held, back to 22 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 28 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
2m 47s
Average length
33s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,315 reactions across 24 posts, in 34 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 39.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
😁90839.2%
👍44519.2%
💯32113.9%
944.06%
🤬893.84%
💩562.42%
🤡562.42%
🤮552.38%
👏522.25%
😢512.20%
🔥241.04%
🥴200.864%
🤩190.821%
😱180.778%
🤯160.691%
🙈150.648%
🥱110.475%
🌭100.432%
👀100.432%
🌚80.346%
14 further kinds371.60%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 28 of the 28 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,743 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
8
across the posts below
Posts paid on
7
of 28 we hold a reading for · 25%
Most on one post
2
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @polpotkids. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 28 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

11 Aug 2026, 15:24 UTC881 views50 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

«Пентабазированные ботократы пытаются украсть выборы» — скажут провокаторы и враги, как будто нет причин, почему у нескольких сот россиян периодически одновременно среди ночи резко возникает непреодолимое желание зайти голосовать на этот канал. Колосящиеся партийные надои выстреливают аккурат тогда, когда КПРФ, внезапно ставшая тараном против ботократической оккупации, идет вверх. В сущности — имеет место все та же

👍23😁17💯82

8 Aug 2026, 16:10 UTC≈2,550 views160 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Все они были мертвы. Волк, Медведь, Заяц. Каждый хотел меня съесть. Каждый получил свое. Собирать улики стало поздно пару сотен патронов назад. В ее объятиях я забывал о мертвых, хотя и знал, что скоро присоединюсь к ним. Мы были похожи на двух призраков, преследующих друг друга в темноте. «Чего я хочу: мечты Колобка». Сигарету. Выпить. Чтобы светило солнце. Забыться и заснуть. Изменить прошлое. Вернуть Бабку и Дедку

😁117👏207🌚6😱4🔥2🤡2🦄2

8 Aug 2026, 13:16 UTC≈1,880 views49 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

О, правда? Но есть нюансы: в перераспределении ресурсов востока Конго поучаствовали даже такие страны, как Бурунди, вот только помогло это не ВВП их государства, а исключительно личному благосостоянию режима. Да и не конголезские это ресурсы, ибо, во‑первых, постколониальные границы остались колониальными, а потому должны быть пересмотрены, во‑вторых, конголезского государства там нет, даже террористы ИГ на местах об

👍299💯9🌚2

7 Aug 2026, 16:40 UTC≈1,820 views123 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Самое честное голосование наглядно. Надойная такая лесенка. Бурные, долго не стихающие аплодисменты, переходящие в овацию. Все встают. «Обратная связь по пентабазису», но с нюансом. Ух, премудрые пескари какие. Всех-всех победили. Нужно больше такого на самом деле. Даже обидно, что пожалели бюджетную копейку, не сделали 99,9%. Зашивайся, ретушируй, заливай ботов, подвози курганских армян, делай самые-самые красив

😁81🤡14🤮13🙈53🤩3🤬2👍1

7 Aug 2026, 15:49 UTC≈1,750 views152 reactions2 Starsread 12 August 2026

Теперь хочу вставить пять копеек по поводу участившихся на фоне выборов разговоров о «конфликте» между уехавшими и оставшимися. Множество людей покинуло страну, в том числе, например, среди моих друзей. Немалое количество лиц транслирует свою позицию, которую вполне можно назвать адекватной, особенно от фигур, не отметившихся в калоедстве начиная с 22-го года. По ту сторону их немного, но они есть. А вот фронтир вс

👍78💯4810😁7👏4🕊1🤡1🥰1

7 Aug 2026, 15:07 UTC≈1,720 views116 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026

Голосование относительно грядущих «выборов» завайпано ботами. Цифры за правящую партию буквально несколько процентов не дотягивают до ВЦИОМовских. Да, я в курсе про опцию сделать голосование только для подписчиков канала, но хотелось получить максимально широкий результат. Демократия, панимаиш. Наивный... Они подвергают обструкции волеизъявление даже на одной из самых свободных платформ мира, и какой платформе — кр

💯81👏1610👍3😁3👎2😢1

6 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTC≈9,490 views413 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Poll

За кого голосуете?

  1. 🐻 Единая Россия27%
  2. 🟥 КПРФ19%
  3. 🟦 ЛДПР13%
  4. 🧴 Новые люди5%
  5. 🟨 Справедливая Россия4%
  6. 🍎 Яблоко6%
  7. 🟢 Другая партия3%
  8. ✍️ Испорчу бюллетень6%
  9. 🚯 Не пойду на выборы13%
  10. ❌ Негражданин РФ/Меньше 18/Слить голос3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

👍208😁109💩52🤯16🤡12🥴8🤔4🦄2

6 Aug 2026, 16:04 UTC≈2,170 views111 reactions1 Starread 12 August 2026
Video

«Когда хотела выложить видео из Чечни и донести, что там добрые люди, но не поняла, почему посыпались такие комментарии» — Ненавижу вас и презираю! Девушек убивают чуть что а эти «кьонахи» шляются с шалавами — Наташки вы для чеченцев максимум можете быть насадками на член и то пару раз! — Эту свиноту отправьте домой — От лица чеченцев — вам тут никто не рад! — ВАМ РУССКИМ НИКТО НЕ РАД — Наташки нам не нужны езж

😁73😢12🤮11🤬63🤡3🙉2🙈1

6 Aug 2026, 15:38 UTC≈2,050 views62 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Video

В Ингушетии казнили «колдуна» и «повелителя джиннов» Троих мужчин задержали по подозрению в убийстве 52-летнего жителя Сунжи. Убийцы были уверены: сосед «заколдовал» родственника одного из них и «вселил в него джинна». Колдуна покойного тоже проверить надо на всякий случай. Может, там целый склад очень мощных гри-гри, дюжина скальпов альбиносов, шесть амулетов Иблиса — тогда, по сути, все правильно, и братья сработ

😁39🔥12🗿4😱41🤮1🙈1

6 Aug 2026, 15:08 UTC≈1,910 views96 reactionsread 12 August 2026

Мария Захарова: «Какие-то третьи силы, которые хотят внести раздор между Россией и Азербайджаном, возложили цветы в Киеве в честь погибших ВСУшников». Ровно год назад та же Захарова: «СБУ собирается использовать текущие, эм... Противоречия... Нынешнего момента... Чтобы разжигать вражду [между РФ и Азербайджаном]. Нам известно о планах задействовать перебежчиков из России, готовых за деньги под российским флагом со

😁69🤬97👏5🤮5🤡1

31 Jul 2026, 19:04 UTC≈3,150 views124 reactionsread 12 August 2026

ФОМ: ▪️70% россиян доверяют Владимиру Путину, — лишь в пределах 1% что-то там переливается между 15% «затрудняющихся ответить» и 15% «недовольных». А вот тревожность существенно возросла: 57% встревоженных, хотя еще в феврале их якобы было всего 38% против 56% спокойных. ▪️«Единая Россия» держится на 35% поддержки, КПРФ упала на один пункт до 10%, то же самое с ЛДПР и НЛ, потерявших один пункт до 6%. А вот СРЗП хот

😁98🥴11🤬4🤮3😢32👾1🔥1

31 Jul 2026, 16:11 UTC≈3,090 views65 reactionsread 12 August 2026
Photo

Наши разведчики победят их диверсантов

😁61🥱4

Showing the 12 most recent of 28 posts we hold for @polpotkids. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

6 Aug 2026, 16:37 UTCAnonymous Poll6,280 voters approx.

За кого голосуете?

  1. 🐻 Единая Россия27%
  2. 🟥 КПРФ19%
  3. 🟦 ЛДПР13%
  4. 🧴 Новые люди5%
  5. 🟨 Справедливая Россия4%
  6. 🍎 Яблоко6%
  7. 🟢 Другая партия3%
  8. ✍️ Испорчу бюллетень6%
  9. 🚯 Не пойду на выборы13%
  10. ❌ Негражданин РФ/Меньше 18/Слить голос3%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 28 most recent posts we hold, published 22 July 2026 to 11 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 9 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Дева Дивная
@deva_divna · 27,311
Telegram ranks this channel #15 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 11 September 2026
Кирилл Кабанов
@kabanovkv · 52,448
Telegram ranks this channel #23 of 83 here — alongside 82 others — read 24 August 2026
Тени Руси
@tenirusi · 25,548
Telegram ranks this channel #33 of 81 here — alongside 80 others — read 14 September 2026
Неверный путь
@nevernyyput · 51,089
Telegram ranks this channel #50 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 25 August 2026
Alex Parker Returns
@apwagner_real · 89,769
Telegram ranks this channel #55 of 64 here — alongside 63 others — read 21 August 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 14 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Утенок Пол Пота” (@polpotkids), 6,475 subscribers as measured 14 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/polpotkids.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.