Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for 𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐚

Channel

𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐚

@pomogator17

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Cite this entry

15,208subscribers

-4,579 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002283466988
TypeChannel
Username@pomogator17
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live31 October 2026
Measurements held56
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 31 October 2026
On Telegramt.me/pomogator17

Topic

Other / unclassifiable — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 47% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

13,86219,78916,825.56 August 2026 — 19,787 subscribers6 August 2026 — 19,789 subscribers7 August 2026 — 19,782 subscribers8 August 2026 — 19,773 subscribers9 August 2026 — 19,757 subscribers10 August 2026 — 17,404 subscribers11 August 2026 — 17,328 subscribers12 August 2026 — 17,312 subscribers13 August 2026 — 17,303 subscribers14 August 2026 — 17,287 subscribers16 August 2026 — 17,271 subscribers17 August 2026 — 17,258 subscribers18 August 2026 — 17,237 subscribers19 August 2026 — 17,225 subscribers21 August 2026 — 17,219 subscribers22 August 2026 — 17,193 subscribers23 August 2026 — 17,178 subscribers25 August 2026 — 17,162 subscribers26 August 2026 — 17,157 subscribers27 August 2026 — 17,151 subscribers28 August 2026 — 17,102 subscribers29 August 2026 — 17,156 subscribers30 August 2026 — 17,097 subscribers31 August 2026 — 17,061 subscribers1 September 2026 — 17,077 subscribers2 September 2026 — 17,053 subscribers3 September 2026 — 17,043 subscribers5 September 2026 — 17,058 subscribers8 September 2026 — 16,992 subscribers11 September 2026 — 17,907 subscribers13 September 2026 — 17,944 subscribers14 September 2026 — 17,938 subscribers16 September 2026 — 17,912 subscribers18 September 2026 — 17,883 subscribers25 September 2026 — 18,028 subscribers3 October 2026 — 17,886 subscribers8 October 2026 — 17,361 subscribers12 October 2026 — 17,436 subscribers14 October 2026 — 17,613 subscribers15 October 2026 — 16,223 subscribers16 October 2026 — 15,626 subscribers17 October 2026 — 14,589 subscribers18 October 2026 — 13,955 subscribers19 October 2026 — 13,896 subscribers20 October 2026 — 13,862 subscribers21 October 2026 — 15,825 subscribers22 October 2026 — 15,784 subscribers23 October 2026 — 15,757 subscribers24 October 2026 — 15,727 subscribers25 October 2026 — 15,693 subscribers26 October 2026 — 15,632 subscribers27 October 2026 — 15,572 subscribers28 October 2026 — 15,520 subscribers29 October 2026 — 15,465 subscribers30 October 2026 — 15,267 subscribers31 October 2026 — 15,208 subscribers15,2086 August 202631 October 2026
56 measurements spanning 86 days, net -4,579. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,973–20,678 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 56
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
31 Oct 2026, 20:5415,208-59
30 Oct 2026, 17:5915,267-198
29 Oct 2026, 16:2615,465-55
28 Oct 2026, 13:5915,520-52
27 Oct 2026, 13:4915,572-60
26 Oct 2026, 12:4615,632-61
25 Oct 2026, 13:5115,693-34
24 Oct 2026, 11:2915,727-30
23 Oct 2026, 13:4515,757-27
22 Oct 2026, 16:5915,784-41
21 Oct 2026, 08:2115,825+1,963
20 Oct 2026, 09:3913,862-34
19 Oct 2026, 13:0513,896-59
18 Oct 2026, 13:0513,955-634
17 Oct 2026, 11:0014,589-1,037
16 Oct 2026, 10:1015,626-597
15 Oct 2026, 11:4616,223-1,390
14 Oct 2026, 09:0717,613+177
12 Oct 2026, 17:4817,436+75
8 Oct 2026, 05:1717,361first reading

Engagement

62 posts held, back to 24 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 62 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 62 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 September 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 09s
Average length
14s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

2,779 reactions across 49 posts, in 17 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤1,07038.5%
🥰42815.4%
🔥33412.0%
💋2509.00%
🍓2207.92%
❤‍🔥1525.47%
💘1244.46%
🦄702.52%
👍592.12%
💅431.55%
🤗150.54%
👏40.144%
😍40.144%
✍30.108%
☃10.036%
🏆10.036%
🙏10.036%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 49 of the 62 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,779 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 62 most recent posts we hold, published 24 July 2026 to 3 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
3
across the posts below
Posts paid on
3
of 54 we hold a reading for · 6%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pomogator17. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 62 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 24 July 2026 to 3 September 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

3 Sept 2026, 05:00 UTC37 views18 reactionsread 3 September 2026

💗БЫСТРЫЙ РОЗЫГРЫШ💗 Подпишись наКанал Ставь + в комменты Доп 1 за 10 реакций Доп 2 за участие врозыгрыше Большой шанс победить, Всем удачи💗 Подписка проверяется! Итоги уже завтра

❤11🔥4🥰3

3 Sept 2026, 04:59 UTC37 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

ЖЕНСКОЕ КОМЬЮНИТИ 🏹life | PRO вкус к жизни 🎀вдохновение, образы, бьюти посты и полезные ссылки 🎀рубрики по уходу и уюта для дома 🎀рекомендации по питанию и рецепты, мотивирующие подборки

❤5🔥3🥰2

2 Sept 2026, 12:14 UTCviews —

𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐚 pinned «🤩БЫСТРЫЙ РОЗЫГРЫШ🤩 Подпишись наКанал Ставь + в комменты Доп 1 за реакции Доп 2 за комментарий Большой шанс победить, Всем удачи😘 Подписка проверяется! Итоги уже завтра»

2 Sept 2026, 11:03 UTC179 views44 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🤩БЫСТРЫЙ РОЗЫГРЫШ🤩 Подпишись наКанал Ставь + в комменты Доп 1 за реакции Доп 2 за комментарий Большой шанс победить, Всем удачи😘 Подписка проверяется! Итоги уже завтра

❤32🥰8🔥4

2 Sept 2026, 09:45 UTC189 views68 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Продолжаю знакомить вас с продуктами от бренда DUDU 💚 На этот раз расскажу о сразу трех средствах для волос: сыворотка с аргановым маслом, шампунь и кондиционер с экстрактом чёрного чеснока. Начну с шампуня и кондиционера 🫧 Мне нравится, когда уход — это не просто «помыть голову», а настоящий маленький ритуал. Средства с экстрактом чёрного чеснока помогают сделать волосы более ухоженными и мягкими, а после кондици…

💋25🍓19❤‍🔥16🦄8

2 Sept 2026, 08:12 UTC165 views46 reactionsread 3 September 2026

🛟БЫСТРЫЙ РОЗЫГРЫШ🛟 Подпишись на Канал Ставь + в комменты Доп 1 за реакции Доп 2 за комментарий Большой шанс победить, Всем удачи 🕶 Подписка проверяется! Итоги уже завтра

❤33🔥9🥰4

2 Sept 2026, 07:35 UTC173 views63 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Сегодня я бы хотела поднять очень важную тему, которая касается очень многих женщин. Партия «Новые люди» запустила проект #ЖенщиныХотятЗнать - чтобы кандидаты в депутаты Госдумы ответили на важные вопросы, которые нельзя обходить стороной. Потому что женщины - это не просто электорат. Мы мамы, дочери, жены, подруги. И мы имеем право знать, какую позицию занимают те, кто хочет принимать законы. Вот вопросы, на котор…

❤28🔥19🥰16

1 Sept 2026, 23:24 UTCviews —

𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐚 pinned «😘БЫСТРЫЙ РОЗЫГРЫШ😘 Подпишись наКанал Ставь + в комменты Доп 1 за реакции Доп 2 за комментарий Доп 3 за участие в розыгрыше Большой шанс победить, Всем удачи 👄 Подписка проверяется! Итоги уже завтра»

1 Sept 2026, 11:55 UTCviews —

𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐚 pinned «💗💗💗💗5⃣💗💗Рублей за подписку на Канал Натальи Ставь + в комменты Доп 1 за реакции Доп 2 за комментарий Большой шанс победить, Всем удачи🩷 Подписка проверяется! Итоги через 72ч»

1 Sept 2026, 10:50 UTC≈3,530 views81 reactionsread 3 September 2026

Здесь был быстрый розыгрыш, статус на проверке у блогера.

❤61🔥11🥰9

Showing the 12 most recent of 62 posts we hold for @pomogator17. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@pomogator17 edited 7 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
8 August 2026
Most recent edit
2 September 2026

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 8 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 31 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“𝐃𝐢𝐯𝐚” (@pomogator17), 15,208 subscribers as measured 31 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pomogator17.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.