Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pond of Slime

Channel

Pond of Slime

@pond_of_Slime

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

3,897subscribers

-36 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001173822031
TypeChannel
Username@pond_of_Slime
Created14 July 2018measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live10 September 2026
Measurements held12
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 10 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/pond_of_Slime

Growth

3,8933,9333,9136 August 2026 — 3,933 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,933 subscribers6 August 2026 — 3,932 subscribers10 August 2026 — 3,917 subscribers13 August 2026 — 3,908 subscribers16 August 2026 — 3,902 subscribers20 August 2026 — 3,900 subscribers26 August 2026 — 3,898 subscribers29 August 2026 — 3,893 subscribers1 September 2026 — 3,894 subscribers5 September 2026 — 3,899 subscribers10 September 2026 — 3,897 subscribers3,8976 August 202610 September 2026
12 measurements spanning 35 days, net -36. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 3,887–3,939 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
10 Sept 2026, 11:003,897-2
5 Sept 2026, 02:223,899+5
1 Sept 2026, 16:353,894+1
29 Aug 2026, 09:473,893-5
26 Aug 2026, 02:593,898-2
20 Aug 2026, 00:373,900-2
16 Aug 2026, 18:163,902-6
13 Aug 2026, 02:563,908-9
10 Aug 2026, 03:213,917-15
6 Aug 2026, 21:233,932-1
6 Aug 2026, 10:473,933no change
6 Aug 2026, 09:533,933first reading

Engagement

19 posts held, back to 1 April 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 4 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
25s
Average length
13s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

2,641 reactions across 19 posts, in 29 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 27.2% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
71927.2%
custom 596955767156769268239515.0%
😁30111.4%
🔥2208.33%
🤯2057.76%
😭1325.00%
💊1164.39%
🕊1003.79%
🙉762.88%
🥰752.84%
😢662.50%
🗿652.46%
🙏461.74%
🌭301.14%
🐳170.644%
150.568%
🤡150.568%
🫡90.341%
💅70.265%
🦄70.265%
9 further kinds250.947%

Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 19 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 2,641 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 1 April 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
59
across the posts below
Posts paid on
5
of 19 we hold a reading for · 26%
Most on one post
50
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @pond_of_Slime. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 1 April 2026 to 31 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 21:33 UTC≈4,450 views110 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что... Какое 1 августа. Только что же лето началось. 🤯 А я посты не пишу, все важными делами занимаюсь... В ближайшие дни постараюсь что-нибудь написать. А дел еще немного, надеюсь, закончу в ближайшие пару недель. А там и жизнь наладится[ХАХАХА, шутка]

64😢27custom 596955767156769268213😭2💅1🔥1🦄1🫡1

12 Jul 2026, 13:23 UTC≈6,650 views90 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Школьные запреты на телефоны не приводят к улучшению образования Пока у нас пытаются протолкуть очередные запретные запреты, которые будут запрещать детям телефоны, Национальное бюро экономических исследований США проверило влияние этого запрета на учащихся и недавно опубликовало крупное исследование с результатами. https://tom-dee.github.io/files/w35132.pdf Если кратко: За первый год количество дисциплинарных инц

🔥4122custom 5969557671567692682175🌭3🤡1😁1

6 Jul 2026, 14:13 UTC≈4,230 views81 reactions50 Starsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

56🌭16🐳9

6 Jul 2026, 14:08 UTC≈8,130 views202 reactions6 Starsread 8 August 2026

Ну, что. Наступило очередное лето и сезон криков, что летняя жара наступила из-за изменения климата, объявлен открытым. Ведь то, что летом – жарко, это невероятно. Просто вау. Никогда такого не было, и вот опять. Как же сильно меняется климат... А зимой еще и снег выпадает... Какой же Ад начал происходить. Кажется, мы действительно умрем от климатического апокалипсиса, к которому привели своими же собственными рука

122custom 596955767156769268243🔥29🤡4🐳21🙈1

21 Jun 2026, 17:57 UTC≈7,380 views216 reactionsread 8 August 2026

– Извини, я познакомилась с иностранцем и теперь живу с ним заграницей, мой вайб больше не позволяет общаться с кем-то из какой-то России. – А где именно заграницей? – В Кыргызии.

😁1919🦄5💅43🤡2🤯1😭1

17 Jun 2026, 13:57 UTC≈5,030 views70 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🥰4022🌭8

17 Jun 2026, 13:56 UTC≈6,500 views126 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Раз уж зашла речь про то, как уничтожить компанию могут обычные блогеры, давайте также напомню, как уничтожают конкурентов и сами крупные корпорации, используя буквально любые средства. Так, в 2020 году, прямо перед избранием Байдена, подкомитет по антимонопольному законодательству Палаты представителей США опубликовал крупный доклад о распространении коррупции. Прочитать его можно здесь: [1]https://int.nyt.com/data

57custom 596955767156769268232🔥16😭9🤯8💅2😨2

12 Jun 2026, 14:20 UTC≈4,630 views86 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

43custom 596955767156769268232🥰10🌭1

12 Jun 2026, 14:20 UTC≈7,600 views232 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Недавно случилось это: блогеры практически целиком уничтожили многомиллиардную компанию Apeel Sciences, распространив дезинформацию и расхайпив ее в целый национальный тренд. Это, по сути, 3 года длящаяся и закончившаяся только сейчас[месяц назад] история, насколько эффективно работает купленное очернение репутации. Для незнакомых с проектом, Apeel – это стартап 2012 года в области экологически-чистого продления хр

🤯144😢3919custom 59695576715676926828😭5🔥4😁4🤡3

6 Jun 2026, 17:48 UTC≈3,790 views184 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Photo

Только села за пост губернатора бесплатного клоуна, начала что-то писать. Состояние отвратительное, но хоть горячую воду дали, уже повод. Успею ли к завтра что-то написать? Ставки! Мне кажется, успею только ко вторнику. Не то чтобы много писать, но организм в фиксированном положении сидеть не дает. ☹️ На полчаса сяду за компутер и обратно лежать часа на два, от чего ничего и написать не могу толком. Когда ж я выз

custom 596955767156769268210835🙏30😭8🥰2🤡1

9 May 2026, 07:01 UTC≈5,530 views104 reactions1 Starread 8 August 2026
Video

Video, posted without a caption

😁72😭1411🌚31🤓1😱1🙏1

8 May 2026, 14:37 UTC≈8,560 views183 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Финансирование Snowy 2.0, гидроаккумулирующей насосной станции Австралии, а по совместительству самого дорого и коррумпированного проекта в мире, возросло до 42 миллиардов долларов при изначально запланированном 1 миллиарде. 🦄 https://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2026/04/snowy-hydro-2-0-transforms-into-42-billion-sinkhole/ А дата завершения строительства сдвинулась уже на 2029 год с очередным вероятным переносом, хотя е

108custom 596955767156769268247🔥24😱2🥰1🙉1

Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @pond_of_Slime. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Василий Тополев
@vasil_topolev · 44,443
Telegram ranks this channel #14 of 84 here — alongside 83 others — read 28 August 2026

This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 10 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pond of Slime” (@pond_of_Slime), 3,897 subscribers as measured 10 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pond_of_Slime.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.