Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for [НАБОР В АДМ!] poolverine & spideypool cf 𖦹

Channel

[НАБОР В АДМ!] poolverine & spideypool cf 𖦹

@poolverinexspidypool

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Handles named that no longer answer · Cite this entry

136subscribers

+0 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002912680547
TypeChannel
Username@poolverinexspidypool
CreatedBetween 1 August 2025 and 31 October 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded10 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/poolverinexspidypool

Growth

13413813610 August 2026 — 136 subscribers10 August 2026 — 136 subscribers18 August 2026 — 134 subscribers25 August 2026 — 137 subscribers1 September 2026 — 138 subscribers17 September 2026 — 136 subscribers10 August 202617 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 38 days. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 133–139 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 05:38136-2
1 Sept 2026, 03:03138+1
25 Aug 2026, 22:13137+3
18 Aug 2026, 10:35134-2
10 Aug 2026, 17:24136no change
10 Aug 2026, 13:01136first reading

Engagement

15 posts held, back to 17 February 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 30 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

60 reactions across 10 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 38.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
2338.3%
custom 52944733719526449911626.7%
custom 52941271761137507661118.3%
🌚58.33%
🎉35.00%
🔥23.33%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 60 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 17 February 2026 to 30 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

30 Jul 2026, 10:34 UTC48 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Тв нсфв : › фд сдох 🥀 zhuazhua8949 в твиттере 𝜗ৎ #тейк | #спайдипулы @poolverinexspidypoolbot 𝜗ৎ 📎: я охуела

custom 52944733719526449916custom 52941271761137507662

29 Jul 2026, 09:00 UTC50 views10 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Твкв… лёгкое нсфв?? Как это обозвать📎📎 : › Работы от разных художников(ну оно и видно) но мне показалось это забавным. Типо, в чём его проблема?? Мужик почему ты облизываешь руки????? Кредиты: Первый: thefuzzyaya Второй: Lemlinu Оба из твиттера (ну или Х) 𝜗ৎ #тейк | #спайдипулверины @poolverinexspidypoolbot 𝜗ৎ

custom 52944733719526449915🎉3custom 52941271761137507662

26 Jul 2026, 13:31 UTC65 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

ФУ ПОЧЕМУ ПИТЕР ПОЛУЧИЛСЯ ТАКОЙ ДУШКОЙ 𝜗ৎ #тейк | #спайдипулверины @poolverinexspidypoolbot 𝜗ৎ

🌚51custom 52944733719526449911

26 Jul 2026, 12:12 UTC67 views2 reactionsread 10 August 2026

Как вы думаете кто из них храпит 𝜗ৎ #тейк | #спайдипулверины @poolverinexspidypoolbot 𝜗ৎ

2

22 Jul 2026, 16:32 UTC87 views4 reactionsread 10 August 2026

: › я хз покидайте хэдканоны свои что-ли Я начну(может быть ООС потому что я не так давно начала шарить за Паука): Мне кажется Питер и Логан как-то глупо вступили в отношения, чуть ли не случайно, но возражать не стали потому что ну... Как-будто это был единственный приемлемый вариант?? Питер вначале этих запутанных отношений немного побаивался Логана(хотя во многих комиксах они друг друга ненавидят, я думаю в этой в

4

22 Jul 2026, 15:05 UTC69 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

Тв полуголое тело(?) : › вы там тоже как бы оживляйтесь да 𝜗ৎ #тейк | #спайдипулверины @poolverinexspidypoolbot 𝜗ৎ

6🔥1custom 52941271761137507661

21 Jul 2026, 21:17 UTC68 views5 reactionsread 10 August 2026
File

Тв прямое упоминание нсфв : › что угодно лишь бы фандом был жив... 𝜗ৎ #тейк | #спайдипулверины @poolverinexspidypoolbot 𝜗ৎ

custom 52941271761137507665

21 Jul 2026, 20:34 UTC74 views8 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

: › что угодно лишь бы фд был жив 𝜗ৎ #тейк | #спайдипулверины @poolverinexspidypoolbot 𝜗ৎ

4custom 52944733719526449913🔥1

15 Jul 2026, 10:14 UTC114 views7 reactionsread 10 August 2026
Photo

тв кровь. пульвериныы. @z3l3n01 𝜗ৎ #тейк #пулверины | @poolverinexspidypoolbot 𝜗ৎ Вовремя я выложила конешно📎📎📎

5custom 52941271761137507661custom 52944733719526449911

18 Feb 2026, 06:42 UTC268 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @echoesoftomorrowPhoto

ᅠ 💋 Echoes of Tomorrow – ваш портал в неизведанное будущее вселенной.❤️Теории, прогнозы, возможные сюжетные линии, скрытые знаки и намёки на грядущие события.💋 😻 Обсуждаем, гадаем, фантазируем — вместе создаём будущее любимых героев в сети телеграм каналов. 💋 ᅠᅠ 🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️🌧️ 😻💋😻 ᅠᅠ правила анкета вп пары ᅠ 💋 список персонажей ᅠ список ожидания 💋🤩 ᅠᅠ буст чат тик-ток вести ᅠᅠ

18 Feb 2026, 06:41 UTC230 viewsread 10 August 2026
Forwarded from @nightwingCFDAILYPhoto

🤩 😻❤️😻 navigation 🌟🤩🤩😻 🐦 anon bot mp rules hashtags boost 😻🤩😻😻 Это конфэшн и дэйлик, посвящённый Дику Грейсону {из DC} во всех этапах его жизненного пути:: Робин, Найтвинг, Бэтмен, Агент 37 и прочее.😻 💥 Подписывайтесь, здесь всё самое лучшее по Грейсону!🐶 🐦 credit😻@kkurensia on Tumblr😻

17 Feb 2026, 13:23 UTC198 viewsread 10 August 2026

`꒰📎꒱⁠ : Тейкитейкитейки 𝜗ৎ #щп | @poolverinexspidypoolbot 𝜗ৎ

Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @poolverinexspidypool. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“[НАБОР В АДМ!] poolverine & spideypool cf 𖦹” (@poolverinexspidypool), 136 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/poolverinexspidypool.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.