Channel
@povchelny
On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
800subscribers
-33 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001914328407 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @povchelny |
| Created | 11 April 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel) |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 8 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/povchelny |
Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 20 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 22:39 | 800 | +3 |
| 6 Sept 2026, 19:55 | 797 | -8 |
| 29 Aug 2026, 03:35 | 805 | -11 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 07:54 | 816 | -1 |
| 15 Aug 2026, 00:36 | 817 | -15 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 10:18 | 832 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 01:21 | 833 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:57 | 833 | first reading |
15 posts held, back to 27 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 15 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
35 reactions across 15 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 65.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 23 | 65.7% | |
| 💘 | 6 | 17.1% | |
| custom 5235627926245877158 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| 🔥 | 2 | 5.71% | |
| ❤🔥 | 1 | 2.86% | |
| 👀 | 1 | 2.86% |
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 15 of the 15 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 35 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 15 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
✨ В Набережных Челнах скоро можно будет увидеть звездопад Персеиды — одно из самых ярких астрономических явлений года. Он активен с 17 июля по 24 августа, а пик придется на ночь с 12 на 13 августа — до 100–150 метеоров в час при ясном небе. 📍 Лучшие места для наблюдения: набережная Камы за городом, берег Мелекески, Боровецкий лес и открытые площадки в сторону Тукаевского района. Лучшее время — после полуночи и до …
❤1
🎉Уже 7 августа город отметит День строителя! 📍 Майдан, парк «Прибрежный» ⏰ Начало в 17:00 Тебя ждет праздничная атмосфера, хорошее настроение, яркая концертная программа и незабываемый вечер для всей семьи. ✨ Главными гостями праздника станет легендарная группа «Отпетые мошенники», которая исполнит свои самые известные хиты! Ждем вас 7 августа в парке «Прибрежный»! 🎶
❤1
Posted without readable text
❤3
Posted without readable text
❤1
☕️ Вдруг кто пропустил — у нас всё ещё действует коллаборация с MIELE. Если будете рядом с Набережночелнинским проспектом, 1Г (рядом с детской площадкой), можно забежать за кофе или десертом. А заодно воспользоваться нашей небольшой плюшкой — 10% по промокоду «МЁД». Для этого нужно только быть подписанным на ПОВ | Челны и MIELE в Max и назвать промокод на кассе. Если еще не были в MIELE — это отличный повод заглян…
❤1
Posted without readable text
❤1
☀️ Лето ещё не кончилось, и это хорошая новость Мы собрали чек-лист из простых идей, на которые точно хватит оставшихся недель. Отмечай, что уже сделал, и сохраняй карточку себе. 💛
❤2
💸Хватит ли 500 рублей на выходные в Челнах Челлендж от редактора Азалии: провести два выходных дня в Набережных Челнах, имея в кармане всего 500 рублей. Реально ли вкусно поесть, интересно провести время и не выйти за рамки бюджета? Или 500 рублей сегодня хватает только на дорогу в одну сторону? Смотрите, как справилась Азалия👆
❤1
Posted without readable text
❤1❤🔥1
История Набережных Челнов — о том, как появилось первое поселение, как город рос и менялся, превращаясь в один из крупнейших промышленных центров страны. 🌇 В этом году Набережные Челны отмечают сразу две знаковые даты: 400 лет со дня основания города и 50 лет со дня выпуска первого автомобиля КАМАЗ. Эти юбилеи официально отмечаются в 2026 году. Если хотите лучше узнать историю родного города или освежить её в памя…
❤5💘4🔥2
👉 Где научиться говорить так, чтобы тебя дослушивали до конца! С 26 по 30 августа в Казани проходит V Глобальный молодёжный саммит: 250 делегатов из 40 стран. Пять сессий сделали открытыми — попасть может любой желающий. Первая начинается 28 августа с мастер-класса о речи и голосе, а продолжается ток-шоу о том, чему учиться, чтобы через десять лет быть кому-то нужным. Кто выступает: — Седа Каспарова, эксперт по р…
❤1
Posted without readable text
❤3
Showing the 12 most recent of 15 posts we hold for @povchelny. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“ПОВ | Челны” (@povchelny), 800 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/povchelny.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.