Channel
@povelitbur
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
11subscribers
-1 since we began measuring on 3 October 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002016364031 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @povelitbur |
| Created | Between 1 November 2023 and 31 May 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 3 October 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 23 October 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 23 October 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/povelitbur |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 15 Oct 2026, 15:04 | 11 | -1 |
| 3 Oct 2026, 13:22 | 12 | no change |
| 3 Oct 2026, 12:47 | 12 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 6 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.
ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 1 of 5 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.
| Window | Rolling 30 days · latest post in window 3 October 2026 |
|---|---|
| Posts held | 18 (6 August 2026 – 3 October 2026) |
| Views total | 29 |
| Reactions total | 1 |
| Forwards / comments | not exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated |
| Readings taken | 3 Oct 2026, 13:22 UTC |
Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.
Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.
Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
6 reactions across 5 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 66.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 4 | 66.7% | |
| 🔥 | 1 | 16.7% | |
| 😁 | 1 | 16.7% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 6 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 October 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Люблю, когда по количеству знаков видно, что история набирает обороты. Ваш автор расписался!😂🔥 Я сажусь на ту же качель, но стараюсь, чтобы между нами было максимально возможное расстояние. – Вам идет это платье, – делает комплимент Рей, и я готова поклясться, он думает, что я переоделась, чтобы его впечатлить. – Это мой рабочий костюм. В нем езжу в Министерство или провожу совещания во Дворце. – Не у нас ли в Нюаже…
Работа над новой книгой кипит - публикую примерно 1 главу в день, что не так просто, ведь осенью не так много времени даже просто сесть за ноутбук. Но есть вдохновение - не вижу препятствий. – При... Здравствуйте! – обращаюсь я к ней, не зная, как еще начать разговор. – Меня зовут Рей. – Я Кристина. – Кристина? Я думал, у вас имя позаковыристее будет. Повелительница Бурь, кажется, совсем не таких слов ждала. Судя п…
– Интересно, – отвечает мне покупательница и продолжает свой «обход». – Здесь много такого, что трудно сделать. Может быть, у вас талант и вы делаете что-то сами? Думает, я попадусь на крючок. – Я очень много времени потратил на поиск таланта, – отвечаю я, а девушка останавливается около мягкого кресла. Теперь мы стоим напротив, будто пытаемся просканировать друг друга детектором сил. – Но увы. Мне остается завидоват…
О ДА Я ЭТО СДЕЛАЛА Рей обладает уникальной магической способностью создавать любые предметы из ничего. В Облачном мире его талант уникален, но запрещен: ему не нужны ни материалы, ни энергия. Он ни за что не привык платить и может позволить себе любую вещь, только лишь представив ее. Кристина - Повелительница Бурь, управляющая погодой на Земле. В Облачном мире она одиночка, привыкшая нести груз ответственности и сп…
Если вы думали, куда это я пропала, то знайте, что 🔥вчера мне пришла идея новой романтической истории. Мрачнее, более жесткая такая. Ближе по стилю к книгам Алекс Хилл. 🔥хочу вписаться в конкурс ромфэнтези на платформе Литнет и переработать одну мою любимую написанную историю о Повелительнице Бурь. Спросила у мужа, как мне все успеть. Ответ - никак. П - поддержка😂
❤1
Как думаете, как долго я буду это всё читать?😂
😁1
Ничего не пишу и не редактирую уже почти 2 недели. И началось то самое чувство, когда руки чешутся начать. Но пока дам себе ещё отдых и пока что вольюсь в рабочую колею. А потом как продолжу...
У МЕНЯ ТАКИЕ НОВОСТИ... 💣💣💣 Но рассказывать пока не могу. И заболеть умудрилась (но уже поправляюсь и готовлюсь выйти на работу со следующей недели) Работаю немного из дома и развлекаюсь. Вот , например, можно пройти такой тест Кто ваш идеальный мужчина из книг Лии Арден. Делитесь вашими результатами в комментариях!
❤1
Пока здесь почти ничего не пишу, потому что пытаюсь ухватить конец августа за хвост 😂 Хотя не планирую активно писать книгу осенью, все равно расчертила лист, чтобы написать план новой книги. А в плане их 3. Как успеть - не представляю... Пусть план будет. Кто я такая, чтобы идти против своих желаний. Буду делиться цитатами из уже опубликованных книг. И жизнью, когда начнётся новый учебный год и моя работа препод…
❤1
Копать картошку вчера было очень грустно, потому что урожай не удался. Мелкая. Зато урожай книг у меня в этом году - и прочитанных, и написанных- очень хороший. Никогда еще за лето не писала 2 книги. Теперь планы следующие: 1⃣ Я отредактировала "Ненависть по-соседски" У меня есть одно дело с ней, о котором говорить не буду, но скоро сделаю книгу платной, поэтому успевайте ЧИТАТЬ НОВУЮ ВЕРСИЮ ТУТ 2⃣ Немного отреда…
Я закончила книгу. Сегодня-завтра опубликую эпилог на Литрес. Грустно, что история закончилась. Радует, что 📚впереди редактура, а значит, еще до конца месяца я не расстанусь с Арием, Сиреном, Павой и Кроном 📚книга будет дилогией. Но вы это в эпилоге поймете😂 А пока - читайте предпоследнюю главу. Свадьба отменена. Мы с Арием больше не жених и невеста. Мы не вместе. Крон ни разу не поговорил со мной, хотя мог бы это…
❤1🔥1
Photo, posted without a caption
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @povelitbur. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Что показать?
Shares as published, totalling 0%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 6 August 2026 to 3 October 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 15 October 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Анна Тетерина. Пишет📚❤️” (@povelitbur), 11 subscribers as measured 15 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/povelitbur.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.