Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 15 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
20 measurements spanning 79 days, net +22. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 2,426–2,469 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
24 Oct 2026, 03:45
2,462
+2
20 Oct 2026, 20:20
2,460
+1
17 Oct 2026, 17:27
2,459
-4
14 Oct 2026, 21:40
2,463
-1
11 Oct 2026, 21:02
2,464
+6
5 Oct 2026, 16:17
2,458
+7
27 Sept 2026, 23:18
2,451
+9
18 Sept 2026, 05:19
2,442
+2
14 Sept 2026, 02:17
2,440
+8
10 Sept 2026, 06:58
2,432
-8
5 Sept 2026, 00:16
2,440
-2
1 Sept 2026, 18:08
2,442
+3
30 Aug 2026, 02:37
2,439
+1
27 Aug 2026, 04:34
2,438
-3
23 Aug 2026, 17:53
2,441
+3
16 Aug 2026, 22:18
2,438
-7
13 Aug 2026, 13:36
2,445
+14
10 Aug 2026, 05:38
2,431
-9
6 Aug 2026, 11:16
2,440
no change
6 Aug 2026, 10:45
2,440
first reading
Engagement
23 posts held, back to 29 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 2 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 23 posts for this entry, the most recent from 7 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
2m 42s
Average length
1m 21s
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
596 reactions across 21 posts, in 18 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
💯
239
40.1%
❤
143
24.0%
👍
65
10.9%
👏
38
6.38%
🙏
25
4.19%
🕊
22
3.69%
💩
18
3.02%
🔥
17
2.85%
😢
13
2.18%
👌
4
0.671%
❤🔥
3
0.503%
⚡
2
0.336%
👻
2
0.336%
🏆
1
0.168%
💊
1
0.168%
😘
1
0.168%
🤔
1
0.168%
🤣
1
0.168%
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 23 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 596 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 23 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 7 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Bepaalde mensen die tèveel weten, tèveel volgers hebben en tèveel waarheid naar buiten brengen worden door regeringen vermoord - zoals altijd al het geval is geweest.
En denk niet dat die hufters in Den Haag niet zo zijn❗️Zijn zijn de satanische MAFFIA❗️🧐🧐🧐
Die duivelse pedofielen die daar zitten zijn doodeng en levensgevaarlijk❗️🧐🧐🧐👿👿👿
Maar bij de Politie kijken ze ook dáár liever voor weg en doen ze net of ze ge…
🔥🔥🔥
Clones,
Roepen we ook al tijden dat die wel degelijk bestaan. 😖
Maar laten we gewoon lekker blijven wegkijken met onze cognitieve dissonantie…hè…? 🤔
Wegkijkers zijn medeplichtig aan satanische rituelen, verkrachting, slachting, kindermoord en zelfs nòg erger dan dat❗️
https://www.facebook.com/reel/1730234754971984/?referral_source=external_deeplink&original_uri=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.facebook.com%2Fshare%2Fv%2F1E…
The mysterious time traveler Vincent Cassel sent chills down the nation's spine in a recent broadcast. He claims to have actually lived in the future: one year in 2074, and a full three years in 2317!
To prove his unbelievable journey, he accurately detailed specific events that unfolded exactly as he predicted in 2023. Top US experts in the studio were left absolutely floored. Now, Cassel is issuing a dire warning …
Fakenieuws? Zoals gewoonlijk van dit soort bronnen - of toch echt?
We zullen zien.
Maar als het echt is, dan doet karma gewoon haar werk denk ik….💫
https://www.rtl.nl/nieuws/binnenland/artikel/5632815/zondaginterview-chris-klomp-heeft-kanker-maar-zet-strijd-tegen
💩18👍7👌4🔥1
Showing the 12 most recent of 23 posts we hold for @powerofthepack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Power of the People! De kracht van autonome mensen.” (@powerofthepack), 2,462 subscribers as measured 24 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/powerofthepack.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.