Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for PPT HACKS

Channel

PPT HACKS

@ppthack

On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

833subscribers

-7 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002369108986
TypeChannel
Username@ppthack
CreatedBetween 1 September 2024 and 31 March 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 September 2026
Measurements held4
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/ppthack

Growth

833840836.58 August 2026 — 840 subscribers8 August 2026 — 840 subscribers21 August 2026 — 838 subscribers3 September 2026 — 833 subscribers8 August 20263 September 2026
4 measurements spanning 26 days, net -7. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 832–841 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Sept 2026, 00:48833-5
21 Aug 2026, 11:56838-2
8 Aug 2026, 09:33840no change
8 Aug 2026, 03:16840first reading

Engagement

5 posts held, back to 17 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
23s
Average length
12s

Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

193 reactions across 5 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 37.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
7237.3%
custom 52471357800144107735226.9%
🔥3317.1%
custom 52897227558711629002211.4%
custom 520631883748974380173.63%
🤔42.07%
👍31.55%

Custom emoji. 3 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 5 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 193 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 17 July 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

3 Aug 2026, 16:45 UTC191 views37 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

По горячим следам после премии хочу поделиться слайдами с выступления Ольги Иваненко на вечно актуальную тему: «Сверхсервис vs рабство: где грань между превосхождением ожиданий клиента и выгоранием?» Оля рассказывала про закулисье проекта с такими вводными: ⭐️6 слайдов ⭐️3 недели ⭐️1 000 000 ₽ Помню, когда сумма появилась на экране, мы все переглянулись и одобрительно сказали «НОРМАААЛЬНО!» Но потом выяснилось, чт

22🔥7custom 52471357800144107736🤔2

1 Aug 2026, 17:04 UTC239 views69 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

А ваша-то взяла награду в номинации «продающая презентация» сегодня 🕺🕺🕺🕺🕺🕺🕺

custom 524713578001441077334custom 5289722755871162900199custom 52063188374897438014👍3

31 Jul 2026, 17:37 UTC274 views31 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Моя 10-дневная раскайфовка дома подошла к концу)) Ездила в свой родной город, тыщу лет не была там именно летом) Вставала без будильника, много ела и обещалась с семьей и друзьями) батарейка заряжена на 100%🦋 Я из города Отрадный Самарской области, только в 18 лет переехала учиться в Москву) А вы откуда и где живете сейчас?

19🔥6🤔2custom 52471357800144107732custom 52063188374897438011custom 52897227558711629001

30 Jul 2026, 20:12 UTC311 views30 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Мой канал захватили новости про подкаст 😎😎😎😎 В этот раз обсуждали тему, которая многим покажется душной, но на самом деле касается почти каждого дизайнера: плагиат, непрошеная критика и авторское право. Помните, я рассказывала, что мое портфолио сплагиатили практически 1:1? И автор не только не извинился, но и вообще не увидел в этом никакой проблемы…. Именно после этой истории мы с Аленой решили, что одному из пе

🔥11custom 524713578001441077398custom 52063188374897438011custom 52897227558711629001

17 Jul 2026, 07:22 UTC422 views26 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Спасибо вам за такой теплый отклик на первый выпуск подкаста! 🙂 Честно, я не ожидала получить стооооолько приятных комментариев и сообщений... Спасибо каждому, кто послушал, поделился выпуском или просто написал слова поддержки 😊 Поэтому мы решили не затягивать и уже выпустили новый эпизод! В этот раз говорим о теме, которая сейчас волнует, кажется, каждого дизайнера: «Когда же нас заменит ИИ?» Обсудили, как сейч

14🔥9custom 52063188374897438011custom 52471357800144107731custom 52897227558711629001

Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @ppthack. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“PPT HACKS” (@ppthack), 833 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppthack.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.