Cordoba , Argentina pedestrian hit by car.
🤯32😱9👍7😢7❤6🕊4🤷♂2🖕1
Signed A T

Channel
@ppvtahoe
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,750subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 September 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001802350350 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @ppvtahoe |
| Description | Breaking News Car Accidents & Crime Videos This channel is for awareness and Informative purposes only. The content is for mature audiences. |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 10 January 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 September 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 6 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/ppvtahoe |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 6 Sept 2026, 17:22 | 2,750 | no change |
| 6 Sept 2026, 16:47 | 2,750 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 10 January 2023 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 22 November 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 6 September 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 16 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
1,632 reactions across 18 posts, in 32 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 19.9% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 324 | 19.9% | |
| 🤯 | 312 | 19.1% | |
| 😱 | 222 | 13.6% | |
| 😢 | 199 | 12.2% | |
| 🤣 | 142 | 8.70% | |
| 🕊 | 84 | 5.15% | |
| ❤ | 67 | 4.11% | |
| 🤡 | 56 | 3.43% | |
| 🤬 | 49 | 3.00% | |
| 😨 | 31 | 1.90% | |
| 👎 | 21 | 1.29% | |
| 🔥 | 21 | 1.29% | |
| 🙏 | 14 | 0.858% | |
| 🥴 | 12 | 0.735% | |
| 👏 | 11 | 0.674% | |
| 😁 | 11 | 0.674% | |
| 👀 | 10 | 0.613% | |
| 🖕 | 8 | 0.49% | |
| 😐 | 7 | 0.429% | |
| 🎉 | 6 | 0.368% | |
| 12 further kinds | 25 | 1.53% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1,632 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 10 January 2023 to 22 November 2023, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Cordoba , Argentina pedestrian hit by car.
🤯32😱9👍7😢7❤6🕊4🤷♂2🖕1
Signed A T
4th of July
🤯55🤡23👍16🤣13😢9🎉6❤5👏3
Signed A T
This one is not graphic but worth posting.
🤣89❤34👍10😐7😁6👎1🖕1
Signed A T
Paramount, California — According to the videographer it was a fatal crash driver was drunk. Haven’t seen any news reports on it. So I can’t verify this as accurate.
😱24🕊13🤯8❤7👍7😢2🙏2🖕1
Signed A T
Last night on the I10 freeway coming from Cabazon not sure what happened.
🤯21😢6👍4❤2🔥2😱2🖕1
Signed A T
Motorcycle crash on near Tampa Florida
🤯32❤4😢3👍2🔥1
Signed A T
South Los Angeles, California Crash involving motorcycle rider. Happened on Dec 9, 2022
😱38🙏12👀7👍7🕊5❤2😢1
Signed A T
Photo, posted without a caption
😢19👍5❤1
Signed A T
Jumper at Star Lofts on Biscayne in Miami, Florida
😨31😢8👍3❤2🙊2😱1
Signed A T
Miami Florida - Happened a few weeks ago. Jumped from high rise building.
🤯41😱24👍10😢8❤1
Signed A T
Here is when the mutts attacked the firefighters. By this time the man was already dead laying behind the garbage can.
😢33👍18🙉5👎2😈2🤩1🥰1
Signed A T
WARNING GRAPHIC VIDEO WATCH AT YOUR OWN DISCRETION ‘Horrific scene’: Dog owner arrested after elderly man killed, 3 others injured Occurred earlier today. SAN ANTONIO, TX – A “horrific scene” unfolded on the West Side Friday afternoon after a brutal dog attack claimed an elderly man’s life and left three other people injured, officials said. As of Friday night, San Antonio police confirmed one of the dogs’ owners h…
🤬38😱22👍4🕊3❤2🖕2🤯2🍌1
Signed A T
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @ppvtahoe. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 6 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“PPV_TAHOE” (@ppvtahoe), 2,750 subscribers as measured 6 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/ppvtahoe.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.