JR北:不是哥们

Channel
小摄影师的幻想罢了
@prepreview
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
773subscribers
+14 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001483085509 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prepreview |
| Created | Between 1 April 2019 and 30 September 2021 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 6 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 7 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prepreview |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 16:58 | 773 | +4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 08:54 | 769 | +1 |
| 21 Aug 2026, 00:34 | 768 | +2 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 08:44 | 766 | +6 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 15:51 | 760 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 12:21 | 760 | +1 |
| 6 Aug 2026, 09:04 | 759 | first reading |
Engagement
16 posts held, back to 4 August 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 16 posts for this entry, the most recent from 5 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
日本人不是没试图通过人工放生鱼苗之类的动作进行干预,但效果不显著,一年还是只能捞个四千来吨。 https://ja.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E3%83%8B%E3%82%B7%E3%83%B3
羽幌港简明渔业史。 总之北海道西岸地区曾经盛产鲱鱼,但出于至今没有明确结论的原因(海温变化和滥捕各执一词)在1910年以后产量严重下降,1957年羽幌更是只捞了199吨,直接毁灭了羽幌的捕鱼业。
可以看出,在大正和昭和年间,不论你家有没有钱,幼儿夭折还是个很常见的事情,光是这一家就没了三个 科学技术确实是第一生产力.jpg
此外路过了一个寺院的公墓。其中看到一家给自己老祖供了一瓶宝矿力,也不知他家明治年间老祖喝不喝得惯
继续北海道故事。 在回程路上从上羽幌方向绕了一圈,看了另一个装车的点。昔日这里曾有各种宿舍,工厂,设备…… 但如今一切已经复归山林
苹果甚至打了索尼两遍
iPod打完iPhone打
索半赢了,但是索尼没赢
一定是那苹果,它把索尼大哥打至跪地……
现在看来大家真是赚不到钱
只能发动pay to win技能了
Showing the 12 most recent of 16 posts we hold for @prepreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Forward network
Republished by
Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“小摄影师的幻想罢了” (@prepreview), 773 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prepreview.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.