Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Pressfeed

Channel

Pressfeed

@pressfeed

On this record: Previous handles · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

9,431subscribers

+94 since we began measuring on 5 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001005367831
TypeChannel
Username@pressfeed
DescriptionPressfeed — о маркетинге, пиаре и о том, как продвигаться без бюджета. Сайт https://clck.ru/3SXLgY Журнал https://clck.ru/3SXLe3 По вопросам рекламы: @valleryfertser
Created6 October 2015measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live24 August 2026
Measurements held9
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 24 August 2026
On Telegramt.me/pressfeed

Previous handles

Recorded in 2019 as “Pressfeed. Маркетинг без бюджета — the title held for this same channel (matched by Telegram id, not by handle) in the Pushshift Telegram Dataset, a third-party archive captured in 2019-2020, years before this register made its own first observation. CC BY 4.0, Baumgartner, Zannettou, Squire & Blackburn (2020), Zenodo. A third party’s dated snapshot, not a measurement this register made itself.

Growth

9,3379,4319,3845 August 2026 — 9,337 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,337 subscribers6 August 2026 — 9,348 subscribers9 August 2026 — 9,358 subscribers11 August 2026 — 9,374 subscribers15 August 2026 — 9,392 subscribers18 August 2026 — 9,406 subscribers21 August 2026 — 9,416 subscribers24 August 2026 — 9,431 subscribers5 August 202624 August 2026
9 measurements spanning 19 days, net +94. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 9,323–9,445 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
24 Aug 2026, 18:479,431+15
21 Aug 2026, 04:539,416+10
18 Aug 2026, 15:069,406+14
15 Aug 2026, 04:349,392+18
11 Aug 2026, 23:159,374+16
9 Aug 2026, 09:519,358+10
6 Aug 2026, 19:219,348+11
6 Aug 2026, 02:519,337no change
5 Aug 2026, 20:069,337first reading

Engagement

56 posts held, back to 27 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 26 pagesof Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.10%
avg views ÷ 9,431 subscribers
Avg views / post
386
56 posts measured
Reaction rate
2.72%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
56
of 56 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views— note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 24 August 2026
Posts held56 (27 July 202624 August 2026)
Views total21,634
Reactions total588
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken25 Aug 2026, 04:44 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
3,920
Videos
163
Links
4,830

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 25 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Reaction mix

390 reactions across 43 posts, in 15 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 42.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
16742.8%
🔥9925.4%
👍379.49%
🤣215.38%
😁164.10%
😐123.08%
😍112.82%
👏71.79%
🥴61.54%
❤‍🔥51.28%
🗿41.03%
20.513%
😭10.256%
🙏10.256%
🤔10.256%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 56 of the 56 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 588reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 56 most recent posts we hold, published 27 July 2026 to 24 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

24 Aug 2026, 14:30 UTC128 views8 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Что общего у Pressfeed и Премии «Евразия»? Пять экспертов, которые будут смотреть на ваши заявки 👀 Pressfeed стал партнёром международной Премии «Евразия» — пять представителей команды вошли в экспертное жюри и будут оценивать заявки участников: 🔷 Константин Бочарский, СЕО 🔷 Екатерина Горина, СМО 🔷 Валерия Ферцер, контент-директор 🔷 Анна Кочукова, руководитель отдела пресс-релизов 🔷 Наталья Самсонова, руководитель

5🔥2👍1

24 Aug 2026, 09:34 UTC235 views5 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Коллега пишет такое сообщение. Ваша реакция? Привет! Ваня уходит в отпуск. На следующие две недели все его задачки — твои. Он везде тебя тегнул в таск-трекере, забери, пожалуйста 🙏 Что ответите? Пишите варианты в комментарии 👇

🔥3🤣2

21 Aug 2026, 10:08 UTC306 views20 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Коллеги, сколько из вас пользуются нейросетями? ❤️ — использую 🔥 — нет В 2024 году мы проводили исследование о том, как пиарщики, журналисты, эксперты и не только используют нейросети в работе. 35% опрошенных тогда совсем не использовали ИИшки. Поэтому теперь мы хотим узнать, как часто специалисты используют нейросети, для каких задач и какие инструменты превратились в рутину в 2026 году. Все ответы анонимны — нам

16🔥3👏1

21 Aug 2026, 07:23 UTC298 views9 reactionsread 25 August 2026

5 запросов от журналистов — проверьте, ищут ли вас для публикации в СМИ 🔷 Деловой Петербург разбирается в теме электронного документооборота — подойдут комментарии участников рынка и экспертов отрасли. 🔷 ФедералПресс хочет понять, почему россияне массово отправляются в путешествие в Китай — нужны эксперты в туризме. 🔷 РИА Новости ищет трихолога для темы по уходу за волосами. 🔷 Российская газета готовит материал о

4🔥3👏1🙏1

20 Aug 2026, 14:24 UTC311 views7 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Что заставит нас поставить вашей рассылке 10 из 10 на премии Unisender? 👀 Скоро узнаем, потому что Pressfeed уже в деле: CEO Константин Бочарский, CMO Екатерина Горина и контент-директор Валерия Ферцер вошли в жюри премии. Но перед тем, как отправлять заявку, предлагаем самим побыть в жюри и посмотреть на свою рассылку со стороны: её хочется открыть и дочитать, а бизнес-результаты она выполняет? Если такая рассыл

3🔥3👏1

20 Aug 2026, 10:36 UTC335 views21 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Соглашаетесь на срочные созвоны? 😐 — нет, это ужасно бесит ❤️ — мне норм, какая разница, что делать в рабочее время

😐127🤣1😁1

20 Aug 2026, 08:00 UTC332 views3 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Вы уже поставили бесплатный веб Pressfeed в список дел на сегодня? Если нет, тогда как вы узнаете, как набрать аудиторию в блог с нуля в 2026 году? И как получите ответы экспертов на все вопросы вместе с подарками? Откладывайте задачки и присоединяйтесь на трансляцию через час — ждём вас в 12:00 по мск 💙

3

19 Aug 2026, 07:31 UTC320 views5 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Сохраняйте полезные инструменты от руководителя отдела пресс-релизов Pressfeed 💙 🔷 OutX — инструмент для мониторинга LinkedIn-профилей людей. Можно следить за журналистами, экспертами и видеть изменения в их активности. Полезная штука, если ваша работа с человеком не заканчивается после одного питча. Ну и ещё, чтобы оправдывать своё сталкерство. 🔷 Ground News — помогает посмотреть, как разные медиа освещают одну и

5

18 Aug 2026, 12:00 UTC299 views4 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Приходите на бесплатный вебинар — вместе с руководителем агентства «Есть контакт!» Викторией Раневской расскажем, как набирать аудиторию новому блогу: от экспертов, которые хотят продвигать личный бренд до корпоративных историй. Когда: 20 августа в 12:00 по мск Где: онлайн по ссылке — регистрируйтесь на трансляцию и задавайте вопросы спикерам перед вебом

4

18 Aug 2026, 09:37 UTC369 views12 reactionsread 25 August 2026
Photo

Дарим бесплатный курс по маркетингу, пиару и контенту — в нём собрано 27 вебинаров от экспертов из Т-Банка, GetCourse, Pressfeed и не только. Он подойдёт тем, кто: ▫️ давно в нише, но постоянно учится новому — слушает подкасты, ходит на вебинары; ▫️ только изучает основы продвижения и хочет разобраться в каналах и инструментах; ▫️ просто проводит время с пользой. Забирайте курс по ссылке 💙

🔥5👍43

Showing the 12 most recent of 56 posts we hold for @pressfeed. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 6,432 of 1,602,822entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 11 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 24 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Pressfeed” (@pressfeed), 9,431 subscribers as measured 24 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pressfeed.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.