Channel
@prinesla
On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
92subscribers
+1 since we began measuring on 8 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001748081856 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @prinesla |
| Created | Between 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 3 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 4 times, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/prinesla |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 16 Aug 2026, 20:14 | 92 | +1 |
| 9 Aug 2026, 14:17 | 91 | no change |
| 8 Aug 2026, 05:01 | 91 | first reading |
19 posts held, back to 11 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 19 posts for this entry, the most recent from 27 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
128 reactions across 18 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 40 | 31.3% | |
| 👍 | 40 | 31.3% | |
| 🔥 | 17 | 13.3% | |
| 👏 | 14 | 10.9% | |
| 😁 | 8 | 6.25% | |
| 💯 | 3 | 2.34% | |
| 🤣 | 2 | 1.56% | |
| 👌 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 💔 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 💘 | 1 | 0.781% | |
| 🤔 | 1 | 0.781% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 18 of the 19 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 128 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 27 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prinesla. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 19 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 11 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Принесла вам на хвосте законопроект из сферы образования, это уже моя личная классика. Проект закона внесли депутаты Государственной Думы Ю.В. Афонин, М.Н. Берулава, М.В. Дробот, В.П. Исаков, А.В. Куринный, Н.А. Останина, О.Н. Смолин и Сенатор Российской Федерации А.М. Гибатдинов. Предвкушая обсуждение, напишу сразу, что критиковать законопроект искренне не хочется. Парламентарии предлагают совершенствование механиз…
❤3👏2👍1🔥1
Принесла вам на хвосте законопроект "О государственных гарантиях цифровых прав граждан Российской Федерации" от депутатов Государственной Думы от КПРФ. Он знаменует собой как раз тот шаг, который я ждала от ЛДПР или Новых людей, но до составления документа и его внесения дошли именно представители КПРФ. О том, как прошел круглый стол в Государственной Думе по этой же теме от ЛДПР писала здесь. Также у меня уже выходи…
👍3❤2🔥2
Принесла вам на хвосте законопроект по внесению изменений в Федеральный закон "Об основных гарантиях избирательных прав и права на участие в референдуме граждан Российской Федерации". Злободневно, как обычно, другого я и не приношу. Внесен 8 июля депутатами Государственной Думы Г.П. Камневым, В.П. Исаковым, А.В. Куринным, А.В. Прокофьевым, а также Сенатором Российской Федерации А.М. Гибатдиновым. Сейчас: 1. По решени…
🔥6👍5👏3❤1💔1🤔1
Принесла вам на хвосте связку из законопроектов, внесенных депутатами С.М. Мироновым, А.А. Кузнецовым, М.Г. Делягиным, Д.Г. Гусевым, А.В. Терентьевым, Н.В. Новичковым, С.В. Кабышевым и А.С. Аксёненко. Имеется какое-то странное ощущение, что все законопроекты этой недели “пресные”, но в то же время есть стойкое желание, чтобы “острых” становилось все меньше (и после выборов – особенно). Предположу, что все мы уже знае…
❤4🔥3👏2
Продолжу дискуссию коллег касаемо предмета “Обществознание” в школьной программе. Заметила, что на это пока никто не обратил должного внимания, поэтому займу эту нишу. В данном контексте я буду опираться на свой практический опыт преподавания предмета в средней школе. 🔵Ну и, конечно, раз дискуссию начали политологи, то отмечу, что имею не только педагогическое, но и политологическое образование (хоть и специфическое…
❤5👍3🔥2
Такой закон нужен?
The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Photo, posted without a caption
😁3❤2💘1
Принесла вам на хвосте законопроект, о котором сообщили из каждого политического утюга. Но поскольку я не являюсь утюгом, но птицей, тоже решила высказаться. Если очень коротко, то законопроект Новых людей предполагает освобождение граждан от наказания за самостоятельный ремонт асфальта во дворах или на местных дорогах. Недостатки, с которыми я вынуждена согласиться, подробно умными словами описаны в официальном отз…
❤3👍3👏3
Принесла вам на хвосте пример законодательной инициативы (внесенной Законодательным Собранием Санкт-Петербурга) о внесении изменений в Кодекс Российской Федерации об административных правонарушениях. ❓Пример чего? На мой взгляд, важность законотворчества состоит в том, чтобы не терять единообразие и приводить в соответствие те акты, которые успели устареть или просто потеряли стройный вид. Да, это более душное чтиво…
👍3❤1
Обе картинки смешные и одновременно грустные. А еще обе эти картинки когда-то были пройдены мной на личном опыте. Да-да, помимо обзоров законопроектов я периодически совершаю попытки сделать хоть что-то ❓А каким вы видите решение проблемы госбюрократии? Даже можете не привязываться к педагогам, другие важные профессии тоже утонули в бумагах и классификаторах, инструкциях. Работники медицинской сферы, например (да и…
❤1🔥1
Принесла вам на хвосте очередную попытку помочь педагогами или хотя бы рассказать об этом так, чтобы люди проголосовали. Спойлер: ни то, ни другое не представляю вероятным. Попытка вносится депутатами Государственной Думы С.М. Мироновым, А.А. Кузнецовым, А.С. Аксёненко, Ф.С. Гумусовым, Н.В. Новичковым, М.Г. Делягиным, А.В. Терентьевым, Д.Г. Гусевым. Очень краткое и лаконичное предложение дополнить статью 47 Федерал…
👍5❤3👏2
Настроение, конечно, где-то на этапе "уу У", хоть я и не сова
👍4💯3😁3
Showing the 12 most recent of 19 posts we hold for @prinesla. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Такой закон нужен?
The shares total 161%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 19 most recent posts we hold, published 11 May 2026 to 27 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
Names
Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“СОРОКА НА ХВОСТЕ ПРИНЕСЛА” (@prinesla), 92 subscribers as measured 16 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prinesla.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.