Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Private College

Channel

Private College

@privat_college

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

14,884subscribers

-142 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001735180511
TypeChannel
Username@privat_college
CreatedBetween 1 December 2021 and 30 April 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live19 September 2026
Measurements held30
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 19 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/privat_college

Topic

Education — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 10 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 92% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

14,88415,02614,9557 August 2026 — 15,026 subscribers7 August 2026 — 15,026 subscribers8 August 2026 — 15,022 subscribers9 August 2026 — 15,024 subscribers10 August 2026 — 15,017 subscribers11 August 2026 — 15,010 subscribers12 August 2026 — 15,007 subscribers14 August 2026 — 14,996 subscribers15 August 2026 — 14,993 subscribers16 August 2026 — 14,991 subscribers17 August 2026 — 14,990 subscribers18 August 2026 — 14,985 subscribers19 August 2026 — 14,984 subscribers20 August 2026 — 14,985 subscribers22 August 2026 — 14,989 subscribers23 August 2026 — 14,985 subscribers24 August 2026 — 14,982 subscribers25 August 2026 — 14,972 subscribers27 August 2026 — 14,965 subscribers28 August 2026 — 14,962 subscribers31 August 2026 — 14,958 subscribers1 September 2026 — 14,949 subscribers2 September 2026 — 14,943 subscribers6 September 2026 — 14,938 subscribers9 September 2026 — 14,923 subscribers11 September 2026 — 14,924 subscribers13 September 2026 — 14,907 subscribers15 September 2026 — 14,904 subscribers17 September 2026 — 14,898 subscribers19 September 2026 — 14,884 subscribers7 August 202619 September 2026
30 measurements spanning 43 days, net -142. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 14,863–15,047 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 30
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
19 Sept 2026, 16:3614,884-14
17 Sept 2026, 07:5614,898-6
15 Sept 2026, 05:1714,904-3
13 Sept 2026, 13:0014,907-17
11 Sept 2026, 19:4114,924+1
9 Sept 2026, 08:1514,923-15
6 Sept 2026, 03:5614,938-5
2 Sept 2026, 09:1614,943-6
1 Sept 2026, 06:2914,949-9
31 Aug 2026, 02:5314,958-4
28 Aug 2026, 01:2414,962-3
27 Aug 2026, 02:3214,965-7
25 Aug 2026, 22:5714,972-10
24 Aug 2026, 22:4714,982-3
23 Aug 2026, 10:1314,985-4
22 Aug 2026, 00:2514,989+4
20 Aug 2026, 20:4614,985+1
19 Aug 2026, 21:4114,984-1
18 Aug 2026, 19:2214,985-5
17 Aug 2026, 20:4414,990first reading

Engagement

31 posts held, back to 26 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 55 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
3.18%
avg views ÷ 14,884 subscribers
Avg views / post
474
2 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.37%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
2
of 31 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 31 August 2026
Posts held31 (26 July 2026 – 31 August 2026)
Views total947
Reactions total13
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken3 Sept 2026, 11:01 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
6m 35s
Average length
1m 19s

Measured directly from 5 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

156 reactions across 21 posts, in 6 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 60.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤9560.9%
🔥3623.1%
❤‍🔥1710.9%
💯53.21%
👍21.28%
😁10.641%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 22 of the 31 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 156 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 31 most recent posts we hold, published 26 July 2026 to 31 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Aug 2026, 10:23 UTC435 views2 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

«ПОТОМ» закончилось Если вы весь год думали: «Курс хочу, но куплю потом» — плохие новости. Потом наступило 😅 ‼️Сегодня последний день ликвидации «Высшего любовного мастерства 5.0». Это тот самый курс, где не «поговорим о важности страсти», а огромная библиотека того, что конкретно делать:техники, сценарии, флирт, раскрепощение, массажи, оральные и мануальные ласки, работа с фантазиями — то, что можно буквально бра…

❤2

30 Aug 2026, 15:01 UTC512 views11 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

В 19:00 собираемся на камерный эфир с Юлией Белой "вопрос-ответ" по ссылке: https://t.me/pcollege_YuliaBelaya?livestream Заходите, будем общаться❤️‍🔥🔥

🔥8❤3

25 Aug 2026, 12:17 UTC996 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

А теперь главная новость уходящего августа... 01.09.2026 💔

❤10

23 Aug 2026, 05:59 UTC≈1,150 viewsread 3 September 2026

"Высшее любовное мастерство" ЛИКВИДИРУЕТСЯ❌🔞 В листе предзаписи уже 557 человек. Успейте получить лучшую стоимость: https://t.me/privat_college_bot?start=c1787234927179-1094972-ds

21 Aug 2026, 11:21 UTC≈1,010 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Мы его закрываем. И перед закрытием решили устроить ликвидацию. Не скидку на 10–20%, которую красиво назвали «последним шансом». Цену действительно будем опускать в разы. А тем, кто заранее попадёт в лист предзаписи, дополнительно отдадим 3 материала, которых не будет в обычном предложении: ❤️‍🔥отдельный урок с обзором игрушек ❤️‍🔥«Дофаминовый взрыв» с идеями для возвращения новизны в отношения и ещё одну практику…

21 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC807 viewsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Внимание: новость. Для многих — плохая. А для кого-то наоборот — шанс👇🏻 Можно ещё год сохранять посты «как вернуть страсть в отношения», покупать красивое бельё и надеяться, что в субботу каким-то образом само появится настроение. А можно наконец признать: желание в долгих отношениях редко поддерживается само Когда вы знаете, как флиртовать с собственным мужем, как провоцировать, как создавать ожидание, как не пре…

20 Aug 2026, 16:53 UTC810 views4 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Video

Короче, куда делся секс? 😅 Муж тот же. Кровать та же. Возможность вроде есть. А вместо «хочу тебя» — «я устала», «давай завтра» и самое сексуальное событие вечера — наконец-то поменяли постельное бельё. 👉🏻И вот тут обычно начинаются две версии: 1. «Ну а что ты хотела после 10 лет вместе?» 2. «Наверное, со мной что-то не так». Спойлер: ни одна не помогает вернуть желание. Поэтому мы с Татьяной Друговой записали п…

❤2🔥2

20 Aug 2026, 15:44 UTC695 views1 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Это плачет наш отдел продаж, Катя и Наташа, потому что мы слишком щедрые...и готовим событие, от которого ТАМ 🔞 станет влажно! Ой, девчонки, что мы для вас готовим🔥 Закрепите канал, чтобы не пропустить новости!

👍1

18 Aug 2026, 15:31 UTC844 viewsread 3 September 2026

А вдруг я просто слишком многого хочу? Красивый — да. Умный — обязательно. Деньги — важны. Щедрый — ещё важнее. Эмоционально зрелый. Верный. Интересный. Чтобы хотелось секса. Чтобы хотелось разговаривать. И желательно, чтобы не пришлось выбирать три пункта из восьми😂 А потом после очередного знакомства женщина начинает торговаться сама с собой: «Ну машины нет, зато умный». «Ну холодноват, зато успешный». «Ну мне …

16 Aug 2026, 09:04 UTC932 views0 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

А вы сможете угадать 3 тайных желания своего мужчины? 😏 Только чур не подглядывать и не спрашивать заранее. Представьте, что перед ним лежит список из 20 сексуальных фантазий и можно выбрать всего три. Какие пункты он отметит? Кажется, что вы знаете ответ? 👀 Тогда предлагаю маленький эксперимент. Я собрала 20 мужских сексуальных фантазий — от вполне предсказуемых до тех, о которых партнер мог ни разу вам не намек…

16 Aug 2026, 06:48 UTC786 views10 reactionsread 3 September 2026
Photo

Предлагаю сегодня в 20:00 мск собраться на наш еженедельный воскресный эфир🔞🔥 Как всегда: с вас ваши вопросы и ОБЯЗАТЕЛЬНОЕ присутствие! а с меня — разбор ваших ситуаций и бесплатная консультация на любой случай из вашей жизни😉 Пишите вопросы в комменты, буду смотреть и готовиться👇🏻❤️

❤10

Showing the 12 most recent of 31 posts we hold for @privat_college. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 19 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Private College” (@privat_college), 14,884 subscribers as measured 19 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/privat_college.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.