Channel
@privateobservatory
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
71subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1001076275871 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @privateobservatory |
| Description | Нерегулярно ни о чём @private_observatory |
| Created | Between 1 September 2016 and 30 September 2017 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 9 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/privateobservatory |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 9 Aug 2026, 23:02 | 71 | no change |
| 6 Aug 2026, 00:45 | 71 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 25 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 2 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 9 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
80 reactions across 10 posts, in 3 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.8% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 39 | 48.8% | |
| 🔥 | 30 | 37.5% | |
| 🥰 | 11 | 13.8% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 80 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 25 June 2026 to 2 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Посмотрела «Одиссею», до этого начитавшись рецензий. Да, действительно, три часа сидишь не отрываясь от экрана, но «Оскар» за это я дала бы шведскому композитору Ёранссону (кажется, у него ещё нет). Все эти отсутствующие у Нолана боги просто переехали жить в саундтрек. По ходу фильма много вспоминала «Бэтмена» — трилогия пришлась на мою максимально пафосную эру и идеально с ней совпала. Все казалось, что Телемаху ну…
❤6🔥4
Узнала у ортодонта, что после брекетов мне ходить с ререйнерами пожизненно. Я тогда буду считаться Железным человеком, да ведь?
🔥4🥰3❤2
А, да — и болела за сборную Норвегии 💔 Брат выдал мне пиво и объяснил футбол, пришлось смотреть, и я, конечно, нашла себе каких-то скандинавов. Теперь опять ни за кого не болею — вернее, болею за всех вратарей
🔥7❤4
Опять не выиграла в «Покорение Марса», выиграла в игру про коллекционирование крестьян, накрасила половину лица красиво, купила браслетик с безумным количеством стразов, сводила 16-летнюю племянницу в кино на «Человека-паука» 2002 года (вердикт: самый кринжовый Человек-паук), обожралась земляники, в одно и то же утро слушала два часа сирен и помогала другой 16-летней племяннице клеить работы для художественного учили…
❤6🔥5
Пензенский отпуск out of context
❤8🥰4
Этот кое-кто я, а мой персонаж становится более chaotic, чем я планировала
❤4
Новости ДнД: кое-кто в партии нажрался сомнительных пирожков и попал в колодки на главной площади! Моя клерик прочитала фанфик про оборотней. У нас забрали топоры (но не вилку).
🥰4
Игра с большим количеством документации
🔥10
Друзья мои, маленькому московскому музею выставили запредельные требования о посещаемости онлайн-выставок. Нужно, чтобы зашло 700 человек. У них пока набралось триста. Давайте доберем еще четыреста просмотров? Что требуется: зайти на страницу выставки про пианиста Танеева и погулять по ней минуты две-три. Полистать фотографии. Работает, увы, только с отключённым ВПНом. Да, безобразие. ССЫЛКА: https://scriabin.museu…
❤5
Внезапная, но горячая пропаганда Сергея Ивановича Танеева в этом канале. Он правда один из лучших чуваков в музыке
❤4
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @privateobservatory. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 9 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“A private observatory” (@privateobservatory), 71 subscribers as measured 9 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/privateobservatory.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.