Automotive — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.
Growth
16 measurements spanning 59 days, net +339. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,758–6,341 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)
Subscribers
Change
5 Oct 2026, 15:19
6,274
+218
28 Sept 2026, 06:16
6,056
+63
18 Sept 2026, 19:38
5,993
+168
14 Sept 2026, 13:57
5,825
-16
11 Sept 2026, 04:02
5,841
-27
6 Sept 2026, 12:16
5,868
-21
1 Sept 2026, 18:44
5,889
-11
30 Aug 2026, 02:12
5,900
-9
26 Aug 2026, 18:33
5,909
-5
24 Aug 2026, 04:47
5,914
-7
20 Aug 2026, 07:06
5,921
+9
16 Aug 2026, 20:37
5,912
-9
13 Aug 2026, 08:47
5,921
-8
10 Aug 2026, 12:52
5,929
-5
7 Aug 2026, 11:52
5,934
-1
7 Aug 2026, 07:02
5,935
first reading
Engagement
26 posts held, back to 28 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 9 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 26 posts for this entry, the most recent from 11 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
What this channel posts
Video runtime
3m 53s
Average length
39s
Measured directly from 6 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
Reaction mix
536 reactions across 26 posts, in 14 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.4% of them.
Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
Reaction
Count
Share
Share, drawn
🔥
254
47.4%
❤
73
13.6%
❤🔥
62
11.6%
👍
58
10.8%
🥰
29
5.41%
custom 5325937378945159976
28
5.22%
😁
13
2.43%
😱
8
1.49%
💋
4
0.746%
😍
3
0.56%
👎
1
0.187%
👏
1
0.187%
🤣
1
0.187%
🤨
1
0.187%
Custom emoji. One row above is a Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The count beside it is Telegram’s.
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 26 of the 26 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 536 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 26 most recent posts we hold, published 28 July 2026 to 11 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Керамика против пленки, кто кого!🔥
До сих пор бытует мнение, что керамика защищает кузов от сколов, и чем больше слоев будет - тем лучше.
Мы решили наглядно показать Вам в чем разница между покрытием керамикой и полиуретановой пленкой.
напомним, что стоимость услуг у нас от:
▪️Керамика ServFace 85.000р (эффект 1 год)
▪️Керамика Krytex 70.000р (эффект 1 год)
▪️Керамика Detail 50.000р (эффект 6 месяцев)
которые сос…
Звездный десант автоблогеров Гриша Zavozin и Ильдар автоподбор высадился у нас в
Pro-Service на Константинова 11А, для съемок очередного выпуска «Битва механиков» автора Вадима «Канал VVL» .
Будет очень интересно увидеть как будут искать причину поломки и ремонтировать очередной автомобиль, поскольку с каждым разом задачи всё сложнее и сложнее для участников.
Следить за выпусками Вадима можете на его канале:
https:…
Как вам идея сделать Mercedes G63 оклейка в матовый сатин не просто ради премиальной внешки, а чтобы автомобиль реально заиграл по-новому? 🙌🏻
Понятное дело, G-класс и без того машина с характером, но когда речь заходит про оклейку в матовый сатин, эффект получается совсем другой.
Автомобиль выглядит дороже, глубже, злее, и при этом сохраняет ту самую эстетику, за которую его так любят.
К нам часто обращаются с подо…
Глянец или мат? Выбор, который кардинально меняет вид автомобиля 💣
Защитная полиуретановая плёнка бывает не только прозрачной и глянцевой.
Матовый полиуретан (Matte PPF) решаeт сразу две задачи:
• Надежная броня: защищает кузов от сколов, песка, царапин и агрессивной химии на мойках.
• Эксклюзивный стиль: преображает родной глянец в глубокий, бархатистый матовый финиш, подчеркивая каждый изгиб и грань кузова.
В…
Showing the 12 most recent of 26 posts we hold for @pro_service. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Posts edited after publishing
@pro_service edited 1 post after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.
An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.
First edit seen
12 August 2026
Most recent edit
12 August 2026
Mentions
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
GMA Detailing | Новости Детейлинга @newsdetailing · 80,117 Telegram ranks this channel #9 of 33 here — alongside 32 others — read 29 September 2026
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 5 October 2026 — this
entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Тюнинг ателье Pro-Service” (@pro_service), 6,274 subscribers as measured 5 October 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_service.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.