Channel
@pro_slavka
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry
66subscribers
+2 since we began measuring on 10 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1002850175217 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @pro_slavka |
| Created | Between 1 June 2025 and 30 September 2025 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 10 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 10 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 2 times, most recently 10 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/pro_slavka |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 2 Sept 2026, 01:18 | 66 | +1 |
| 25 Aug 2026, 07:42 | 65 | +1 |
| 10 Aug 2026, 22:14 | 64 | no change |
| 10 Aug 2026, 21:46 | 64 | first reading |
5 posts held, back to 29 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 5 posts for this entry, the most recent from 4 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 2 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
26 reactions across 4 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 57.7% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| ❤ | 15 | 57.7% | |
| 👍 | 5 | 19.2% | |
| 🔥 | 5 | 19.2% | |
| 👏 | 1 | 3.85% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 4 of the 5 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 26 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 5 most recent posts we hold, published 29 June 2026 to 4 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
Увиденная картинка подтолкнула к размышлениям о нескольких минувших месяцах. Последнее время, когда меня спрашивают: «Как дела?», я всё чаще не знаю, как ответить. Не потому что всё плохо. И не потому что всё хорошо. Просто ощущение, будто старая жизнь заканчивается быстрее, чем начинается новая. Прошел ровно год как я ушел из найма, выстроил понятный мне ритм жизнь. Сейчас многое перестало работать. Форматы, на к…
❤3👍1
Провёл онлайн-встречу для участников проекта «Работающая молодёжь Юга» на тему создания сильной команды. Эта лекция для меня особенная. В неё вошло всё, чему я научился за годы работы с проектными командами: от студенческих инициатив и молодёжных проектов до образовательных программ, корпоративных тренингов и команд, которым приходилось работать в условиях жёстких ограничений и конкуренции. Конечно, мы говорили о к…
❤2👍1
Точка опоры Как принимать свои решения, когда вокруг слишком много чужих ожиданий? Приглашаем на встречу, где с помощью медитации mindfulness, нейрографики и практических упражнений мы сделаем паузу в привычной суете, посмотрим на свою ситуацию со стороны и наметим собственную точку опоры💚 Без готовых советов и шаблонных ответов. Возможность ненадолго остановиться, чтобы отделить собственные желания от чужих ожида…
Есть поездки, после которых возвращаешься с фотографиями. А есть такие, после которых возвращаешься чуточку другим. Мы со старшим сыном вернулись из мужского похода на озеро Селигер, где уже много лет мой давний друг собирает мужчин с сыновьями. На несколько дней они уходят в лес. Без женщин. Без привычной городской суеты. В этот раз нас было почти девяносто человек: мужчины и сыновья — мальчишки от совсем маленьк…
❤6🔥4👍2👏1
Мы часто думаем, что команда это люди, которые просто работают вместе. На практике команда появляется тогда, когда люди начинают слышать друг друга, договариваться, принимать решения и брать ответственность за общий результат. Провёл корпоративный тренинг для команды одного из промышленных предприятий Таганрога. Для команды адаптировал игру, наглядно демонстрирующую возможные вызовы, сложности, роли при проектном у…
❤4👍1🔥1
Showing the 5 most recent of 5 posts we hold for @pro_slavka. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Славные истории | Вячеслав Карась” (@pro_slavka), 66 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/pro_slavka.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.