Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Це не АЦ Щастя

Channel

Це не АЦ Щастя

@probablyanotherone

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

647subscribers

+3 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001321064352
TypeChannel
Username@probablyanotherone
Created18 April 2020measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live2 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 2 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/probablyanotherone

Growth

6436476456 August 2026 — 644 subscribers6 August 2026 — 644 subscribers12 August 2026 — 646 subscribers19 August 2026 — 645 subscribers25 August 2026 — 643 subscribers2 September 2026 — 647 subscribers6 August 20262 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 27 days, net +3. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 642–648 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
2 Sept 2026, 09:02647+4
25 Aug 2026, 14:35643-2
19 Aug 2026, 13:55645-1
12 Aug 2026, 16:44646+2
6 Aug 2026, 17:31644no change
6 Aug 2026, 08:00644first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 29 July 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 31 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 14 posts, in 4 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 47.9% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥2347.9%
1020.8%
🕊1020.8%
💯510.4%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 14 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 29 July 2026 to 31 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

31 Jul 2026, 20:50 UTC158 views6 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Скільки буде хіатус????? Коли знову чекати мега пости????? І як без них жити весь цей час????? Я вже якось казав що до часу варто ставитись з іронією) Та й хтозна у якій формі канал повернеться) Але думаю щось придумаємо, рано чи пізно, так чи інакше)

🔥6

31 Jul 2026, 20:40 UTC163 views5 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Тематична третя чашка напівпорожня, тож можна підбивати підсумки, а підсумок як завжди незмінний, люблю своїх друзів і всім зичу щастя

🕊4💯1

31 Jul 2026, 20:08 UTC179 viewsread 6 August 2026

Чай з єгермейстром, тож не знаю наскільки coherent вийде, бо й для себе це всерйоз не формулював повністю. Певно ключами для розуміння маленької гри останнього року є "сум коли самотність відволікає від шляху" та "жага механізму бути людиною". Відповідно 4.1 (літо/осінь) це заперечення, 4.2 (зима) це прийняття, 4.3 (весна/літо) синтез та зустріч з реальністю. Туди ж і різні повторювані мотиви між мемами, і п'яні ran

31 Jul 2026, 19:08 UTC175 viewsread 6 August 2026

один вагуепост тобі чи два іншому Краще вагуепост в руці ніж два вагуепоста в небі

31 Jul 2026, 19:06 UTC172 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Як вип'єш другу чашку чаю, то розпиши таки, будь ласка! Щось розпишу

🕊3

31 Jul 2026, 19:03 UTC172 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

куди сходити в києві? До води або на поділ, можна ще на якусь гору, або галерею. Між горою та галереєю більше спільного ніж здається

💯1

31 Jul 2026, 19:02 UTC170 views1 reactionsread 6 August 2026

підрозділ вибрав?🌚 Спойлерів не буде)

1

31 Jul 2026, 19:00 UTC167 viewsread 6 August 2026

зрозумієш, як зламати вік, розкажи Я подумаю)

31 Jul 2026, 18:59 UTC166 viewsread 6 August 2026

Коли вже наступне "мені більше не треба..."? Крайнє було останнє, можна детальніше розписати чому, але напевно після 2ої чашки чаю

31 Jul 2026, 18:54 UTC166 viewsread 6 August 2026

Я на каналі недовго. Хто ти? Скільки років, що робиш по життю? Та все якось шукаю підходящі відповіді на це питання. Трохи є проблема в тому що коли знаходжу якісь відповіді, одразу їх ламаю, але то вже таке.. хоча років 26, це поки не зламав

31 Jul 2026, 18:50 UTC170 viewsread 6 August 2026

Коли вже нарешті пройдеш длс для Outer wilds? Еее, не скоро.. але колись обов'язково. Найближчим часом в мене Signalis заплановано

31 Jul 2026, 18:47 UTC172 views3 reactionsread 6 August 2026

Would you go on date with me? With pleasure, my anonymous friend, yet I'm not sure when such an opportunity will appear

🕊3

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @probablyanotherone. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Citation-graph rank

Citation-graph rank — 390,235 of 1,629,808 entries in the measured graph. A weighted position computed from the forward and mention edges below — republished posts weigh more than named mentions — and recomputed periodically, over the whole graph. Published only as this ordinal position, never as a score: a position is a fact, and a score printed beside one channel’s name would read as a verdict this register does not make. The two counts beneath stay separate for the same reason mentions are never summed with forwards anywhere else on this page — a named-by count costs nothing to manufacture. The top 100 by this measure, or how it is computed.

Forward network

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 2 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Це не АЦ Щастя” (@probablyanotherone), 647 subscribers as measured 2 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/probablyanotherone.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.