Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Procom FNaF confession!

Channel

Procom FNaF confession!

@procomfnafcf

On this record: Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Cite this entry

61subscribers

+10 since we began measuring on 14 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1003756544561
TypeChannel
Username@procomfnafcf
Created18 March 2026measured — dated from the channel’s first post
First recorded14 August 2026
Last confirmed live12 September 2026
Measurements held6
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 12 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/procomfnafcf

Growth

516256.514 August 2026 — 51 subscribers15 August 2026 — 54 subscribers21 August 2026 — 58 subscribers28 August 2026 — 61 subscribers3 September 2026 — 62 subscribers12 September 2026 — 61 subscribers6114 August 202612 September 2026
6 measurements spanning 29 days, net +10. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 49–64 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
12 Sept 2026, 16:0161-1
3 Sept 2026, 23:1962+1
28 Aug 2026, 07:3561+3
21 Aug 2026, 11:3458+4
15 Aug 2026, 09:0954+3
14 Aug 2026, 16:0251first reading

Engagement

8 posts held, back to 18 March 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 8 posts for this entry, the most recent from 14 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

48 reactions across 7 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 31.3% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
1531.3%
💘1429.2%
👎510.4%
🥰510.4%
💋36.25%
🌚12.08%
👀12.08%
🕊12.08%
😨12.08%
🤮12.08%
🥴12.08%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 7 of the 8 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 48 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 8 most recent posts we hold, published 18 March 2026 to 14 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

14 Aug 2026, 12:16 UTC58 views7 reactionsread 14 August 2026

привет мы ожили

💋31👎1🕊1😨1

19 Mar 2026, 05:39 UTC586 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026

у нас 85 подписчиков, если что😉

💘2🌚1

18 Mar 2026, 13:07 UTC601 views3 reactionsread 14 August 2026

подозрительных челов (без аватарки, описания, ника) я пускать не буду. пишите сюда, если кого-то не приняла

💘3

18 Mar 2026, 12:38 UTC657 views4 reactionsread 14 August 2026

🤩🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 могут изменяться со временем🤩 правила тейков:: 1. без спама, пожалуйста. 1.1. сформулируйте сначала свою мысль, чтобы было понятно, что именно вы хотели донести, и только потом отправляйте своей тейк. 2. ничьи личные данные мы ни в коем случае не выкладываем. 3. ставьте предупреждение, тв/кв и блюр на нсфв и гуро контент. 4. если и обсуждаем кого-то в негативном ключе, то только и исключительно антисов. 4.1

3💘1

18 Mar 2026, 12:38 UTC575 views6 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🤩🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🤩 0+ списочников любим🤩 моментальный отказ, если вы поддерживаете: • любые виды угнетения (расизм, мизогиния, сексизм, гомофобия, трансфобия, квирфобия, эйблизм, нейрофобия, эйджизм и другое.) • поддерживаете какое-либо насилие ( физическое, эмоциональное, сексуализированное и т.д. ) • любые виды контакта, кроме анти- при пфр. • занимаетесь рейдом, доксом, сватом. • антис/имеете антис-взгляды • радквиры. •

💘6

18 Mar 2026, 12:37 UTC≈6,290 views24 reactionsread 14 August 2026
Photo

🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤 🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤🔤❗ 🤩🤩 🌟 :: затрахали антисы в фд фнафа и хочется о них высказаться❓🌟 🌟 :: а может, хочется просто поделиться любовью к своим любимым комплексным (и не только) пейрингам❓ 🌟 добро пожаловать в проком кф по фнафу! 📽📽 🧁 тут вы можете поделиться своими любимыми пейрингами, и вас никто не осудит!!! 🎭 ❗️ мы принимаем как комплексные пейринги, так и селфшипы и ос/канон! не стесняйтесь делиться своим

11🥰5👎4👀1💘1🤮1🥴1

Showing the 8 most recent of 8 posts we hold for @procomfnafcf. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Procom FNaF confession!” (@procomfnafcf), 61 subscribers as measured 12 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/procomfnafcf.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.