Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Product Pushers ™

Channel

Product Pushers ™

@product_pushers

Not marked by Telegram, checked 26 August 2026

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

8,130subscribers

-130 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1002205018279
TypeChannel
Username@product_pushers
CreatedBetween 1 June 2024 and 30 September 2024 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held14
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/product_pushers

Topic

Marketing & affiliate — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 97% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

8,1308,2608,1957 August 2026 — 8,260 subscribers8 August 2026 — 8,260 subscribers11 August 2026 — 8,256 subscribers14 August 2026 — 8,245 subscribers17 August 2026 — 8,234 subscribers20 August 2026 — 8,229 subscribers23 August 2026 — 8,213 subscribers26 August 2026 — 8,205 subscribers29 August 2026 — 8,201 subscribers1 September 2026 — 8,188 subscribers5 September 2026 — 8,175 subscribers10 September 2026 — 8,161 subscribers14 September 2026 — 8,141 subscribers18 September 2026 — 8,130 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
14 measurements spanning 42 days, net -130. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 8,111–8,280 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 11:018,130-11
14 Sept 2026, 08:568,141-20
10 Sept 2026, 08:208,161-14
5 Sept 2026, 07:178,175-13
1 Sept 2026, 18:598,188-13
29 Aug 2026, 15:078,201-4
26 Aug 2026, 14:438,205-8
23 Aug 2026, 22:368,213-16
20 Aug 2026, 09:238,229-5
17 Aug 2026, 19:088,234-11
14 Aug 2026, 23:058,245-11
11 Aug 2026, 17:338,256-4
8 Aug 2026, 07:218,260no change
7 Aug 2026, 15:168,260first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 14 September 2025the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 20 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 28 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

354 reactions across 20 posts, in 7 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 62.4% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
22162.4%
🔥8122.9%
👍154.24%
👌143.95%
🏆113.11%
👏82.26%
41.13%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 20 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 354 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 28 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

28 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTC≈1,490 views5 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Poll

OG's, have my posts been popping up on your X feed?

  1. yes, often25%
  2. occasionally26%
  3. no, i never see you anymore41%
  4. i don't use X anymore8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

5

28 Jul 2026, 12:40 UTC≈1,600 views8 reactionsread 28 August 2026

hey guys been a while, i just wrote up a massive guide on distribution, figured i'd share it here: https://x.com/eptwts/status/2082083321383997553

🔥8

16 Dec 2025, 14:05 UTC≈7,010 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

does anyone on here make banger faceless VSL's? DM me @heisenbxrg

8👍3

14 Dec 2025, 16:54 UTC≈6,500 views22 reactionsread 28 August 2026

i've deadass spent 50 hours working on this course, probably quadrupled my attention span i got my irl's who aren't that knowledgeable when it comes to online biz to flick through it & they all said they were insanely overwhelmed by all the information prefiring the fact that this is genuinely the greatest product i've ever dropped - can't wait to show you guys

20🔥2

14 Dec 2025, 14:54 UTC≈5,040 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥113

13 Dec 2025, 20:06 UTC≈4,150 views11 reactionsread 28 August 2026

quick summary of how to use AI to make money, notice how we use AI as a tool & didn't build our business around it... leson in there https://x.com/eptwts/status/1999933580722491454

8🔥3

13 Dec 2025, 17:28 UTC≈3,570 views7 reactionsread 28 August 2026

if anyone here is goated at making AI-generated ads, DM me @heisenbxrg got a lot of work for you

👍52

13 Dec 2025, 15:23 UTC≈3,960 views18 reactionsread 28 August 2026

if you're an agency owner, here's what you need to know about selling your services on X: on community-based platforms like X, you’ve gotta be THE person they all come to when looking for your specific type of service you can’t be seen as the pleb (99% of agency owners on this platform) who is tryna hang around & pick up scraps, it becomes obvious that he's desparate for work you can't be seen as the generic “shor

14🔥4

12 Dec 2025, 17:49 UTC≈3,250 views14 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

the "AI-generate infoproducts" crowd is clueless

🔥95

11 Dec 2025, 20:03 UTC≈3,620 views17 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

Photo, posted without a caption

🔥143

9 Dec 2025, 21:08 UTC≈4,030 views33 reactionsread 28 August 2026

my philosophy with V2 is fuck all the technical jargon, i'm gonna teach all the fundamentals of business i know as if i was trying to teach my IRL's each part one by one (this is what inspired this) we're simply using AI as a tool to 10x outputs, AI is not the core of your business, it never will be AI is only powerful if you have the right things to apply it to, gotta build the foundation first

22🏆11

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @product_pushers. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

28 Jul 2026, 13:03 UTCAnonymous Poll361 voters

OG's, have my posts been popping up on your X feed?

  1. yes, often25%
  2. occasionally26%
  3. no, i never see you anymore41%
  4. i don't use X anymore8%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

13 Oct 2025, 13:50 UTCAnonymous Poll509 voters

i'm very curious whether you guys prefer to consume info in text or video format? lets say you bought an infoproduct about organic marketing, would you prefer that it's text-based, video or a hybrid based on the topic?

  1. text-based39%
  2. video19%
  3. a hybrid of the two41%

Shares as published, totalling 99%. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 14 September 2025 to 28 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

AI Guy
@ai_guy_official · 30,108
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 42 here — alongside 41 others — read 15 September 2026
ToHire.NG™
@tohire_ng · 56,578
Telegram ranks this channel #68 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 25 August 2026

This channel appears in 2 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Product Pushers ™” (@product_pushers), 8,130 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/product_pushers.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.