Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Profesional Review Canal

Channel

Profesional Review Canal

@profesionalreview

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

1,069subscribers

+4 since we began measuring on 6 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001135062220
TypeChannel
Username@profesionalreview
CreatedBetween 1 June 2017 and 30 September 2020 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded6 August 2026
Last confirmed live16 September 2026
Measurements held11
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 16 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/profesionalreview

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

1,0641,0701,0676 August 2026 — 1,065 subscribers6 August 2026 — 1,065 subscribers9 August 2026 — 1,068 subscribers12 August 2026 — 1,066 subscribers16 August 2026 — 1,064 subscribers18 August 2026 — 1,065 subscribers24 August 2026 — 1,064 subscribers28 August 2026 — 1,067 subscribers2 September 2026 — 1,070 subscribers8 September 2026 — 1,068 subscribers16 September 2026 — 1,069 subscribers1,0696 August 202616 September 2026
11 measurements spanning 42 days, net +4. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 1,063–1,071 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
16 Sept 2026, 23:391,069+1
8 Sept 2026, 13:191,068-2
2 Sept 2026, 23:141,070+3
28 Aug 2026, 06:021,067+3
24 Aug 2026, 21:141,064-1
18 Aug 2026, 19:561,065+1
16 Aug 2026, 06:111,064-2
12 Aug 2026, 09:351,066-2
9 Aug 2026, 15:111,068+3
6 Aug 2026, 12:371,065no change
6 Aug 2026, 04:281,065first reading

Engagement

20 posts held, back to 5 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

1 reaction across 1 post, in 1 kind.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍1100.0%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 1 of the 20 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 1 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 5 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 11:20 UTC13 viewsread 6 August 2026

Thermaltake Steel Shadow Frost 360 Pro: Refrigeración líquida AIO con pantalla LCD de 6 pulgadas https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/06/thermaltake-steel-shadow-frost-360-pro-liquida-aio-6-pulgadas/

6 Aug 2026, 11:10 UTC16 viewsread 6 August 2026

Apple busca asegurar memoria RAM para sus nuevos iPhone 18 y choca con la negativa de la china CXMT a rebajar precios https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/06/apple-busca-asegurar-memoria-ram-para-sus-nuevos-iphone-18-y-choca-con-la-negativa-de-la-china-cxmt-a-rebajar-precios/

6 Aug 2026, 09:40 UTC22 viewsread 6 August 2026

Corsair renueva su gama de entrada con los teclados Skiff 100 y el ratón Harpoon V2 Wireless https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/06/corsair-teclados-skiff-100-raton-harpoon-v2-wireless/

6 Aug 2026, 09:35 UTC23 viewsread 6 August 2026

Ya está confirmado: esta es la fecha definitiva para el apagón de Google Assistant en favor de Gemini https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/06/ya-esta-confirmado-esta-es-la-fecha-definitiva-para-el-apagon-de-google-assistant-en-favor-de-gemini/

6 Aug 2026, 08:20 UTC27 viewsread 6 August 2026

NEO.AI acelera el hardware de inteligencia artificial combinando X-SRAM y 3D X-DRAM https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/06/neo-ai-inteligencia-artificial-x-sram-3d-x-dram/

6 Aug 2026, 08:05 UTC30 viewsread 6 August 2026

Ya se puede reservar la consola portátil KONKR Pocket Advance de AYANEO por 89 dólares https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/06/nueva-consola-portatil-konkr-pocket-advance-de-ayaneo/

6 Aug 2026, 07:20 UTC35 viewsread 6 August 2026

Huawei confirma los precios del nuevo MateBook Pro con el chip Kirin X90 Plus https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/06/huawei-precios-matebook-pro-chip-kirin-x90-plus/

6 Aug 2026, 06:30 UTC40 viewsread 6 August 2026

Un fallo en el Relay privado de Apple expone la dirección IP real de los usuarios de iCloud+ https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/06/un-fallo-en-el-relay-privado-de-apple-expone-la-direccion-ip-real-de-los-usuarios-de-icloud/

6 Aug 2026, 05:35 UTC41 viewsread 6 August 2026

ASUS cancela pedido pagado de una RTX 5090 y sube el precio 500 dólares https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/06/asus-cancela-pedido-rtx-5090-sube-500-dolares/

6 Aug 2026, 04:40 UTC45 viewsread 6 August 2026

ASUS y Gigabyte encarecen las tarjetas gráficas hasta un 20% en el mercado chino https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/06/asus-gigabyte-tarjetas-graficas-20-mercado-chino/

5 Aug 2026, 17:10 UTC63 viewsread 6 August 2026

Así es OpenMouse, el panel de control web de código abierto para configurar ratones gaming sin instalar software https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/05/openmouse-control-web-ratones/

5 Aug 2026, 16:35 UTC62 viewsread 6 August 2026

¿Es posible transformar un NAS en un PC gaming? Modifican un ZimaCube 2 con una RTX 5060 y su rendimiento sube un 800 % https://www.profesionalreview.com/2026/08/05/es-posible-transformar-un-nas-en-un-pc-gaming-modifican-un-zimacube-2-con-una-rtx-5060-y-su-rendimiento-sube-un-800/

Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @profesionalreview. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 2 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Andro4all
@andro4all · 37,067
Telegram ranks this channel #17 of 74 here — alongside 73 others — read 1 September 2026
Xataka
@xataka · 49,293
Telegram ranks this channel #39 of 86 here — alongside 85 others — read 25 August 2026
Salut
@salutcat · 24,469
Telegram ranks this channel #58 of 79 here — alongside 78 others — read 16 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 16 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Profesional Review Canal” (@profesionalreview), 1,069 subscribers as measured 16 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profesionalreview.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.