Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Профсоюз рабочих

Channel

Профсоюз рабочих

@profsouz_rossii

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry

955subscribers

+215 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1004443519152
TypeChannel
Username@profsouz_rossii
CreatedBetween 1 June 2026 and 3 August 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded8 August 2026
Last confirmed live17 September 2026
Measurements held8
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 17 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/profsouz_rossii

Topic

Politics & activism — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 19 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 63% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

7319558437 August 2026 — 740 subscribers8 August 2026 — 740 subscribers8 August 2026 — 743 subscribers16 August 2026 — 741 subscribers23 August 2026 — 731 subscribers31 August 2026 — 836 subscribers10 September 2026 — 890 subscribers17 September 2026 — 955 subscribers7 August 202617 September 2026
8 measurements spanning 41 days, net +215. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 697–989 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
17 Sept 2026, 11:57955+65
10 Sept 2026, 02:57890+54
31 Aug 2026, 19:48836+105
23 Aug 2026, 22:03731-10
16 Aug 2026, 16:17741-2
8 Aug 2026, 14:51743+3
8 Aug 2026, 02:03740no change
7 Aug 2026, 18:23740first reading

Engagement

10 posts held, back to 3 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.

Reaction mix

88 reactions across 10 posts, in 9 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 22.7% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🙏2022.7%
🕊1921.6%
🔥1415.9%
👍1314.8%
1213.6%
44.55%
😢44.55%
🤬11.14%
🥰11.14%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 88 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Recent posts

6 Aug 2026, 17:09 UTC511 views17 reactionsread 8 August 2026

Posted without readable text

🙏7🕊63👍1

6 Aug 2026, 15:35 UTC405 views11 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Удар по Ярославскому НПЗ «Славнефть-ЯНОС» По данным ряда российских изданий, удару подвергся «Ярославнефтеоргсинтез» нефтегазовой компании «Славнефть», который входит в пятёрку крупнейших предприятий отрасли в России. Очевидцы опубликовали многочисленные кадры с дымом от пожаров в районе промзоны. Известно, что с начала года НПЗ горел из-за обстрелов как минимум шесть раз. Губернатор Ярославской назвал атаку на реги

🔥4🕊321🙏1

6 Aug 2026, 14:25 UTC310 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Для получения гарантий и компенсации, связанных с вредными и опасными условиями труда, необходимо внести изменения в коллективный договор. Мы сделали инструкцию, рассказывающую о том, как это сделать (см. карточки). Также мы сделали образец предложения о начале коллективных переговоров по внесению изменений в коллективный договор (см. ниже). ОБРАЗЕЦ Предложение о начале коллективных переговоров по внесению изменен

3👍2🕊1🙏1

5 Aug 2026, 18:02 UTC133 views10 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

В июле десятки городов России подвергались атакам беспилотников Каждая атака создаёт прямую угрозу жизни и здоровью работников. Однако люди, продолжающие трудиться на объектах, которые становятся потенциальными целями ударов, по-прежнему остаются без заслуженных компенсаций, надбавок за опасные условия труда, дополнительных страховых программ и других мер поддержки. Тысячи работников ежедневно выходят на предприяти

🔥5🕊21😢1🙏1

4 Aug 2026, 17:57 UTC90 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Синдром Персидского залива (Gulf War Illness): опыт из истории Во время отступления из Кувейта в феврале 1991 года иракские войска подожгли более 600 нефтяных скважин (по некоторым оценкам — свыше 700–800 повреждённых, из них около 650 горели одновременно). Пожары продолжались около восьми месяцев, до ноября 1991 года. В атмосферу ежедневно попадали огромные объёмы сажи, оксидов серы (SO₂), оксидов азота (NOₓ), уга

🙏4😢2🕊1

4 Aug 2026, 17:31 UTC84 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Образец уведомления работодателя об отказе от выполнения работы в связи с угрозой жизни и здоровью Я, [Ф.И.О.], работник склада [указать подразделение], уведомляю работодателя о временном отказе от выполнения работы в связи с возникшей непосредственной угрозой моей жизни и здоровью. Основание: Статья 219 Трудового кодекса РФ — право работника отказаться от работы при угрозе жизни и здоровью. Статья 220 Тр

👍51🥰1

4 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTC66 views7 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Poll

Как вы считаете, какой процент надбавки к зарплате справедлив для работников портов, НПЗ и складов за вредные и опасные условия труда?

  1. 4 % - минимальная по закону надбавка9%
  2. 8 %14%
  3. 12 %9%
  4. Больше 12 %36%
  5. Ни какая надбавка не стоит жизни и здоровья, они дороже любых денег32%
  6. Ни какие надбавки платить не нужно, не вижу опасности и вредности в работе этих сотрудников0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

4👍2🔥1

4 Aug 2026, 12:18 UTC68 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Практическая ситуация. В городе объявлена воздушная тревога. Вы - работник склада Wildberries. Вы знаете, что в разных концах страны ведутся атаки дронов на склады Wildberries. Обязаны ли вы выходить на работу? Ответ: Согласно статьи 219 ТК РФ — работник имеет право отказаться от выполнения работы, если возникла опасность для его жизни или здоровья из‑за нарушения требований охраны труда. Статья 220 ТК РФ говорит,

🔥4👍3🕊1

3 Aug 2026, 16:59 UTC75 views6 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Последствия от атак может быть больше, чем заявляются. Продолжаются задержания тех, кто делает видео последствий ударов. Так, полиция задержала мужчину 1995 года рождения, который 24 июля снял на видео последствия удара украинских дронов по логистическим комплексам «Wildberries» в Ленинградской области. На задержанного составили административный протокол на основании регионального законодательства. Мужчина признал,

🕊4🤬1😢1

3 Aug 2026, 14:29 UTC250 views8 reactionsread 8 August 2026
Photo

Что нам известно об ударах по объектам, где работают тысячи людей? За последнюю неделю (27 июля — 2 августа) украинские беспилотники вновь атаковали предприятия, склады, нефтеперерабатывающие заводы и объекты инфраструктуры, где ежедневно работают сотрудники. • 27 июля — НПЗ «Газпром нефтехим Салават» (Башкортостан): массированная атака дронов по нефтеперерабатывающему предприятию. • 29 июля — склад Wildberries, Т

🙏61🕊1

Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @profsouz_rossii. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Polls

The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.

4 Aug 2026, 13:32 UTCFinal Results22 voters

Как вы считаете, какой процент надбавки к зарплате справедлив для работников портов, НПЗ и складов за вредные и опасные условия труда?

  1. 4 % - минимальная по закону надбавка9%
  2. 8 %14%
  3. 12 %9%
  4. Больше 12 %36%
  5. Ни какая надбавка не стоит жизни и здоровья, они дороже любых денег32%
  6. Ни какие надбавки платить не нужно, не вижу опасности и вредности в работе этих сотрудников0%

Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.

Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.

The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.

Read from the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 3 August 2026 to 6 August 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 17 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Профсоюз рабочих” (@profsouz_rossii), 955 subscribers as measured 17 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profsouz_rossii.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.