π¨ Check out this new YouTube video! β οΈ Watch out for the Telegram signal scammers. Learn about the common BS and misconceptions from most Telegram scammers and HOW TO AVOID falling into their pitfall. β€΅οΈ You can't afford to miss this one! π Also if you like this please sub! π€© https://youtu.be/8H5hAD1PrPI

Channel
π Profxllc Analysis - FREE - Indices & Commodities π
@profxllcindices
On this record: Growth Β· Engagement Β· Posts Β· Polls Β· Citations Β· Handles named that no longer answer Β· Cite this entry
138subscribers
-2 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register Β· movement among entries of Under 1,000.
Register entry
| Telegram ID | -1001314149908 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @profxllcindices |
| Created | Between 1 March 2018 and 31 July 2021 β estimated from Telegramβs id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 8 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 13 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 4 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 13 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/profxllcindices |
Growth
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 13 Sept 2026, 21:40 | 138 | -1 |
| 13 Aug 2026, 12:38 | 139 | -1 |
| 8 Aug 2026, 22:17 | 140 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 01:14 | 140 | first reading |
Engagement
20 posts held, back to 12 November 2021 β the reader has not yet reached the start of this channelβs public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegramβs post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute β we hold 20 posts for this entry, the most recent from 6 April 2023. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Recent posts
Grab a coffee and watch this guys! π If youβve been struggling with harmonics/consistency you donβt want to miss this one! π βΆοΈβΆοΈ https://youtu.be/me4e6tMjqYk βοΈβοΈ
π¨ Try Hero Fx! π¨ We've been using this broker guys, thereβs zero spreads/1 point on US30 and some Forex pairs. Been testing it out over the past week it's awesome. Check it out here: https://bit.ly/herofx
π¨ Announcement π¨ All memberships through the bot are disappearing; the bot will only be for customer service from tomorrow! Weβre re-launching the new brand/website/ads etc and have a load more value coming your wayβ¦ β Live trading (London and NY) β Live Q&As β Free Education (In the VIP) β Only High Probability entry signals (Less but more and we will be trading on the Liveβs) β And moreβ¦ My goal is to help as mβ¦
Ben is up having his morning coffee! Get in the Indices group before he drops more absolute bangers!! π€© FXPRO INDICES π€© Now at $49!!! π€―π€―π€― Usual Indices group sell for $150-$200 monthly π€¨ β¬οΈ SUBSCRIBE β¬οΈ @FxPro_Signals_Bot Any questions, go to @fxprochat
RUNNING 8000+ PIPS π΅π΅π΅
Running 50+ Pips β
Running 5500+ Pips πππ
BANG π π΅ π
πππ Running 900+ pips πππ
Okay guys if you want to stay in the free group transfer yourself to this one, this is where you'll get Daily signals/Analysis for both Forex and Indices, this group will no longer be used we're transferring the 3 free groups into x1, thanks. Link is here ππ https://t.me/profxllcfree
Donβt forget to transfer over everyone!
Showing the 12 most recent of 20 posts we hold for @profxllcindices. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked β was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it β t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so β1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Polls
The 2 polls we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered them when we read the post. A pollβs figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Shall I create one FREE group for everything (All free signals and analysis) and share all the content into one group or keep the 2 groups seperate? π§ (Need your help) π¨
- One group67%
- Keep them seperate?33%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Who's excited for the markets to open and ready to smash it next week!? π°π€π
- Me! π€89%
- Nah! β11%
Shares as published. No per-option vote count is published by Telegram, so none is shown.
Percentages only β there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each optionβs share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each optionβs own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 20 most recent posts we hold, published 12 November 2021 to 6 April 2023. Telegram labels each poll by kind β an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results β and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Forward network
Republishes
Channels on the register whose posts this channel has forwarded.
Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.
Handles this channel named that no longer answer
- Dead references
- 1
- handles named in this channelβs posts, vacant today
- Evidenced gone
- 0
- we ourselves saw one of these resolve, at some point
- Never seen alive
- 1
- vacant every time we have ever looked
@profxllcindices named 1 handle that resolve to nothing today. That is a fact about the reference, not necessarily a fact about the handleβs history β see the two groups below.
Most of these may never have existed as a live channel at all. A handle a channel names can be a typo, an aspirational name nobody registered, or a channel that was already gone before this one ever mentioned it. Unless a row below is marked evidenced, all we know is that it references a handle that is not a live channel today β not that anything βdiedβ. How this is measured.
Never seen alive
References a handle that is not a live channel β we have no record it ever was one.
named in 1 post, 9 August 2026 β 9 August 2026
Cite this entry
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 13 September 2026 β this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
βπ Profxllc Analysis - FREE - Indices & Commodities πβ (@profxllcindices), 138 subscribers as measured 13 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/profxllcindices.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV Β· JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.