Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Про Город Владимир

Channel

Про Город Владимир

@progorod_33

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Posts edited after publishing · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

12,505subscribers

-112 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 10,000–31,623.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001646743958
TypeChannel
Username@progorod_33
Created17 December 2021measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live18 September 2026
Measurements held31
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 18 September 2026
On Telegramt.me/progorod_33

Topic

Local community — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 11 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 95% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and why it has no browse page of its own yet.

Growth

12,50512,61712,5617 August 2026 — 12,617 subscribers7 August 2026 — 12,617 subscribers8 August 2026 — 12,613 subscribers9 August 2026 — 12,607 subscribers10 August 2026 — 12,595 subscribers12 August 2026 — 12,597 subscribers13 August 2026 — 12,594 subscribers14 August 2026 — 12,591 subscribers16 August 2026 — 12,587 subscribers17 August 2026 — 12,589 subscribers18 August 2026 — 12,585 subscribers19 August 2026 — 12,583 subscribers20 August 2026 — 12,590 subscribers21 August 2026 — 12,589 subscribers23 August 2026 — 12,600 subscribers24 August 2026 — 12,594 subscribers26 August 2026 — 12,590 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,584 subscribers27 August 2026 — 12,577 subscribers28 August 2026 — 12,589 subscribers29 August 2026 — 12,583 subscribers30 August 2026 — 12,578 subscribers1 September 2026 — 12,577 subscribers3 September 2026 — 12,573 subscribers4 September 2026 — 12,565 subscribers7 September 2026 — 12,546 subscribers10 September 2026 — 12,528 subscribers12 September 2026 — 12,519 subscribers14 September 2026 — 12,515 subscribers15 September 2026 — 12,507 subscribers18 September 2026 — 12,505 subscribers7 August 202618 September 2026
31 measurements spanning 42 days, net -112. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 12,488–12,634 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 31
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
18 Sept 2026, 00:0212,505-2
15 Sept 2026, 20:3712,507-8
14 Sept 2026, 07:3912,515-4
12 Sept 2026, 13:1512,519-9
10 Sept 2026, 11:4212,528-18
7 Sept 2026, 06:5912,546-19
4 Sept 2026, 16:3912,565-8
3 Sept 2026, 02:0312,573-4
1 Sept 2026, 00:1612,577-1
30 Aug 2026, 21:1312,578-5
29 Aug 2026, 20:1212,583-6
28 Aug 2026, 21:4412,589+12
27 Aug 2026, 23:0512,577-7
27 Aug 2026, 02:2412,584-6
26 Aug 2026, 00:0512,590-4
24 Aug 2026, 22:4412,594-6
23 Aug 2026, 10:4612,600+11
21 Aug 2026, 18:5412,589-1
20 Aug 2026, 14:5412,590+7
19 Aug 2026, 17:1212,583first reading

Engagement

198 posts held, back to 4 August 2026the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 68 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
4.44%
avg views ÷ 12,505 subscribers
Avg views / post
556
88 posts measured
Reaction rate
0.547%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
88
of 198 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate. It is computed over the 35 of 88 measured posts that carry a reaction reading, and over those same posts' views.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 2 September 2026
Posts held198 (4 August 20262 September 2026)
Views total48,910
Reactions total108
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken2 Sept 2026, 21:27 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 46s
Average length
35s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no mark.

Reaction mix

397 reactions across 106 posts, in 12 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 33.8% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
👍13433.8%
12331.0%
👎5513.9%
🔥358.82%
😢174.28%
❤‍🔥112.77%
🤬102.52%
41.01%
👏30.756%
😁20.504%
😴20.504%
🤯10.252%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 110 of the 198 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 397 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 198 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
6.57%
13 of 198 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
13
posts carrying an erid · 11 distinct tokens
Median views · ads
583
over 13 measured posts
Median views · rest
621
over 185 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. They are printed side by side with the count behind each rather than as a ratio: an ad and an ordinary post are not otherwise matched — for topic, for length, for hour of day — so the gap between them is a description of two groups and not the effect of one being an ad.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2W5zFG4Y6Do217 August 202619 August 2026
2W5zFH7Uf1K214 August 202615 August 2026
2W5zFG6HYBs120 August 202620 August 2026
2W5zFGWG7tM131 August 202631 August 2026
2W5zFGy2bYm118 August 202618 August 2026
2W5zFHBktRF125 August 202625 August 2026
2W5zFJBgT5T125 August 202625 August 2026
2W5zFJKF76R14 August 20264 August 2026
2W5zFJWwH4u120 August 202620 August 2026
2W5zFJXEjW119 August 20269 August 2026
2W5zFK7XY2V111 August 202611 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 198 most recent posts we hold, published 4 August 2026 to 2 September 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

2 Sept 2026, 16:25 UTC272 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Заготовка на зиму, которую в нашей семье делают более 40 лет: перец в томатном соке — банки съедаются до Нового года Сладкий перец в томатном соке получается одновременно закуской, соусом и дополнением к зимнему гарниру. Я приготовила его по семейному рецепту, который используют уже несколько десятилетий. Читать далее: https://progorod33.ru/news/134306

Signed progorod33tg_bot

2 Sept 2026, 16:03 UTC295 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Назад в прошлое Какая улица изображена на фото? Владимир. Примерно 1954 год.

2 Sept 2026, 15:02 UTC318 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Во Владимире продолжается строительство бегового центра ВФЛА Строительство новой площадки находится на завершающем этапе. Работы планируют закончить осенью, после чего комплекс будет открыт для посетителей. Внутри появятся раздевалки и душевые, зал для тренировок и камеры хранения, а на прилегающей территории — зоны для занятий и отдыха. Базовая инфраструктура будет доступна бесплатно. Амбассадор проекта Илья Кехте

2 Sept 2026, 15:00 UTC295 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Все надёжные бригады области — в одном проекте Сейчас мало встретишь ответственных работников, которые делают на совесть. Поэтому специально для вас мы собрали проверенные компании. Бурение скважин, копка колодцев, ремонт крыш, строительство, отделка — выбирайте и звоните напрямую, без посредников. Переходите по ссылке и подбирайте бригаду под свою задачу: https://progorod33.ru/specials/133672

Signed progorod33tg_bot

2 Sept 2026, 13:00 UTC389 views3 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

В Юрьевце подросток избил сверстника в лесу — происходившее сняли на видео. В микрорайоне Юрьевец во Владимире произошёл инцидент с участием несовершеннолетних. В редакцию обратился отец пострадавшего подростка. Обстоятельства случившегося сейчас выясняют правоохранительные органы. Подробности читайте в нашем материале: https://progorod33.ru/news/134292

😴2🤬1

Signed progorod33tg_bot

2 Sept 2026, 07:56 UTC483 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Мебель есть, а места нет: убираю 5 ошибок в расстановке мебели — и комната становится в 2 раза просторнее и светлее без ремонта Даже небольшая комната не обязательно должна выглядеть тесной. Часто ощущение нехватки места создают слишком пестрая палитра, множество мелких предметов, загроможденные проходы и неудачно подобранная мебель. Исправить часть этих проблем можно за один день, не меняя отделку и не покупая новы

Signed progorod33tg_bot

2 Sept 2026, 07:22 UTC474 views4 reactionsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Муромские пенсионеры устраивают велопробеги на трехколесном транспорте Проект поездок на трехколесных велосипедах для людей старшего возраста набирает обороты в Муромском комплексном центре. Пенсионеры объединяются в небольшие группы и регулярно отправляются на совместные велопрогулки. Для поездок используются специальные трехколесные велосипеды с удобными сиденьями, идеально подходящие для людей в возрасте. Перед

🔥4

2 Sept 2026, 02:40 UTC453 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Инспектор просит выйти из машины: когда отказ грозит арестом, а когда проблем не будет — юристы дали однозначный ответ Остановка на посту или в ходе рейда не всегда заканчивается простой проверкой документов — иногда инспектор просит водителя покинуть салон, чтобы пройти в патрульную машину или просто постоять у обочины. Юристы объяснили, когда эти просьбы основаны на законе, а когда автомобилист может продолжать си

Signed progorod33tg_bot

2 Sept 2026, 01:05 UTC478 viewsread 2 September 2026
Photo

Умные пассажиры не садятся на эти места в поезде — секреты выбора идеального места от путешественника с 20-летним стажем Дверь в тамбур грохает буквально в метре от моей головы. За стенкой кто-то богатырски храпит. Ноги вытянуть невозможно, из щелей дует, и каждые полчаса мимо протискивается проводница со стаканами. Всё это я проходила не раз, поэтому теперь просто знаю, какие места в вагоне лучше не занимать. И почт

Signed progorod33tg_bot

Showing the 12 most recent of 198 posts we hold for @progorod_33. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts edited after publishing

@progorod_33 edited 2 posts after it first published — the same permalink now carries different wording than the one this register originally read, caught because our own crawl held a copy of the earlier text.

An edit is not deception. Typo fixes, price updates and corrections look exactly like this too — this register can tell you the wording changed and when, not why. How this is measured.

First edit seen
9 August 2026
Most recent edit
15 August 2026

Mentions

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Новости Владимира и Области
@smi_vladimir · 37,326
Telegram ranks this channel #7 of 59 here — alongside 58 others — read 5 September 2026
Инцидент Владимир🇷🇺
@incident33 · 49,216
Telegram ranks this channel #11 of 26 here — alongside 25 others — read 5 September 2026
Владимирская Русь
@rusvladimir · 31,705
Telegram ranks this channel #48 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 5 September 2026

This channel appears in 3 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 18 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Про Город Владимир” (@progorod_33), 12,505 subscribers as measured 18 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/progorod_33.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.