Channel
@projectdelt
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Posts · Polls · Citations · Cite this entry
24subscribers
+0 since we began measuring on 12 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of Under 1,000.
| Telegram ID | -1003919519612 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @projectdelt |
| Description | Парад кринжа |
| Created | Between 1 April 2026 and 15 May 2026 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 12 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 12 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 2 |
| On Telegram | t.me/projectdelt |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:45 | 24 | no change |
| 12 Aug 2026, 06:31 | 24 | first reading |
18 posts held, back to 15 May 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 18 posts for this entry, the most recent from 16 July 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 12 August 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. Below Telegram’s rounding threshold, so these counts are exact.
Measured directly from 1 video with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
45 reactions across 16 posts, in 10 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 55.6% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 🦄 | 25 | 55.6% | |
| 🔥 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| 🤡 | 4 | 8.89% | |
| ❤🔥 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 💋 | 3 | 6.67% | |
| 😍 | 2 | 4.44% | |
| ❤ | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 👍 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 🤣 | 1 | 2.22% | |
| 🤯 | 1 | 2.22% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 16 of the 18 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 45 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 16 July 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
И возможно они правы, Со своими докторами И бессвязными речами О проблемах и себе.. Но что скажешь делать мне? С моими мыслями, тревогой, С моими страхами о всём, С моей улыбкой бездовольной, С моими тяжбами, тоской? Я потеряюсь вскоре всё же, В своих бессмысленных путях, В твоих бессловных разговорах, Невразумительных речах.
🦄1
Если вы вдруг захотите другую тему, напишите в коммы, может что нибудь придумаю(нет)
Моя прекрасная аудитория из 10 человек , какой следующий стих хотите?
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Чет как я завтыкал в последний месяц. Постараюсь исправиться
🔥1🦄1
Давай, затяни, затяни потуже А будет, будет ли хуже? Ты забыл, забыл слова И язвы, на языке тебе вторят Творения бога вечно хуйню тво’рят Давай, давай, не вскрикни Больно не будет больше Поглубже в суть свою вникни И порезы вновь станут толще И ножами, ножами с зубками И костьми, костями с трубками Ты найдешь свой край родной, Где появится настоящий бог твой
🦄1
Video, posted without a caption
🦄1
Если вдруг доработаю и что то поменяю - выложу исправленную версию(как всегда это случится минимум через год)
🦄1
А я любил тебя? Я не про страсть или похоть Не про мысли в промерзлой ночи А ты? Любила меня? Или я просто глаза закрыл?.. На глупость, на веру На числа, на сердце На все мои мысли наверно А все ж, если честно? Я. Любил. Тебя? На деле - не знаю Те звуки, те песни Я все ж вспоминаю Нечестно.. Впрочем, если подумать.. Всё вполне справедливо. До тени сомненья Мне думать лениво. А если спросить меня? Нет. Не любил…
🤡2❤1🦄1
Обычно я делюсь стихами только тогда, когда они мне прям нравятся и я их не стыжусь, но тут чет как то хочется выложить скоропись
🦄1
Что ж, время нового дропа наверное
🦄1
Я.. не умею писать стихи, Да и читаю из ряд вон плохо. И есть ли хоть что то в них? Мне наплевать, кто с них будет охать. Я в мире не вижу света, Но не буду ногами топать. Все ж, прекрасна наша планета, Несмотря на ее пожравшую похоть. И адские топи, и райские мессы, Коих нет в сей холодном мире, Вряд ди выдержат этого пресса, Что растет среди нашей гнили.
🦄2
Я забываю твои черты И все твои обиды. Забудь же те цветы И мной подаренные книги. Ты уйдешь, устанешь, бросишь. И заставишь винить себя. От чего так больно, спросишь? Мы ведь просто не знали сна. И вспоминая свои срывы И снег, под поступью треща. Я упокоюсь в этих титрах Злодей в них главный - Я
🦄2🔥1🤡1
Showing the 12 most recent of 18 posts we hold for @projectdelt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
The poll we hold for this entry, as Telegram rendered it when we read the post. A poll’s figures keep moving after that, so each one is dated.
Моя прекрасная аудитория из 10 человек , какой следующий стих хотите?
The shares total 175%, above 100: this poll accepts more than one answer per voter. No per-option vote count is published, so the number of voters who chose each option is not derivable and is not shown.
Percentages only — there are no per-option vote counts here, because Telegram publishes none. The public post preview gives each option’s share and a single voter total, and nothing else. Multiplying one by the other would produce a per-option tally that looks measured and is not: the shares are rounded to whole numbers before we ever see them. We print what was published and leave the column that does not exist empty.
The shares need not add up to 100. Rounding alone puts many polls at 99 or 101. A poll that allows more than one answer per voter runs well past 100 by design, and several here do. The bars are drawn against a fixed 100% track at each option’s own percentage rather than normalised to the total, so a poll that exceeds it shows that it does instead of being quietly rescaled.
Read from the 18 most recent posts we hold, published 15 May 2026 to 16 July 2026. Telegram labels each poll by kind — an anonymous poll, a quiz, a closed set of final results — and that label is reproduced rather than paraphrased.
Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 12 August 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Project δ” (@projectdelt), 24 subscribers as measured 12 August 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/projectdelt.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.