Channel
@projectshuk
On this record: Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry
2,684subscribers
-46 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026
Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 1,000–3,162.
| Telegram ID | -1001824230662 |
|---|---|
| Type | Channel |
| Username | @projectshuk |
| Created | Between 1 October 2022 and 30 September 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated. |
| First recorded | 7 August 2026 |
| Last confirmed live | 3 September 2026 |
| Measurements held | 10 |
| Confirmed unchanged | 1 time, most recently 3 September 2026 |
| On Telegram | t.me/projectshuk |
| Measured (UTC) | Subscribers | Change |
|---|---|---|
| 3 Sept 2026, 12:00 | 2,684 | -9 |
| 31 Aug 2026, 05:45 | 2,693 | -4 |
| 27 Aug 2026, 23:04 | 2,697 | +6 |
| 24 Aug 2026, 14:53 | 2,691 | -5 |
| 20 Aug 2026, 22:15 | 2,696 | -5 |
| 18 Aug 2026, 07:34 | 2,701 | -9 |
| 14 Aug 2026, 22:48 | 2,710 | -19 |
| 11 Aug 2026, 14:12 | 2,729 | -1 |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:31 | 2,730 | no change |
| 7 Aug 2026, 15:17 | 2,730 | first reading |
10 posts held, back to 2 June 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 1 page of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.
Nothing published in the last 30 days. ERR and ER are rolling 30-day measures, so there is nothing to compute — we hold 10 posts for this entry, the most recent from 3 August 2026. An engagement rate over an empty window would be a number about nothing.
Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.
167 reactions across 10 posts, in 5 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 40.1% of them.
| Reaction | Count | Share | Share, drawn |
|---|---|---|---|
| 👍 | 67 | 40.1% | |
| 🔥 | 62 | 37.1% | |
| ❤ | 34 | 20.4% | |
| 😁 | 3 | 1.80% | |
| 🤝 | 1 | 0.599% |
No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.
Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.
Coverage. Reactions were read on 10 of the 10 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 167 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.
Measured over the 10 most recent posts we hold, published 2 June 2026 to 3 August 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.
A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @projectshuk. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.
Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.
This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.
Counted over the 10 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 2 June 2026 to 3 August 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.
Ищу монтажёра в команду на постоянную работу. Объём — 15–30 роликов в месяц: рекламные креативы в форматах 1:1 и 9:16 В основном это разговорные видео со вставками, классным современным дизайном — стильно, модно, молодёжно. Пишите в лс @agentshuk, присылайте примеры работ и стоимость. В ответ отправлю референсы, чтобы показать, что хотели бы видеть 🫶
❤3
Signed Сергей Полетаев
Собрал имбу для продаж в B2B 🤖🔝 Калькулятор, который за 1–2 минуты прямо на онлайн-встрече считает клиенту выгоду от внедрения AI в его продажи. Прирост конверсий и окупаемость в трёх сценариях: оптимистичный, реалистичный, консервативный. Зачем. У моих менеджеров по 10 онлайн-встреч в день. И на каждой клиент задаёт один и тот же вопрос: «Окей, а сколько я заработаю с вашего AI?» Считать это в уме нереально. И н…
🔥17👍5
Signed Сергей Полетаев
Второй день тестирую Claude Mythos • упаковал две посадочных страницы под трафик • собрал интерфейс платформы для просмотра уроков • подготовил все необходимые доки и PDF для инвесторов • разработал прототип платформы для AI-агентов на все сумарно ушло 2-3 часа 🔝 с первого раза идеально ничего из этого не получалось — норм результат был с 2-3 выдач
🔥7
Signed Сергей Полетаев
1945 обработанных заявок AI-агентом в салоне красоты во Флориде — но есть нюанс 🤔 Вчера созванивался с Викторией, у неё салон красоты во Флориде. Полгода назад внедрили ей в соцсети AI-агента, и я хотел собрать обратную связь — что зашло, что нет. Подбил цифры: — 1 945 обработанных новых диалогов — средняя стоимость диалога ~30 ₽ — работает 24/7 Примеры работ сам скидывает, слитых клиентов дёргает обратно, запись …
👍10❤7🔥3🤝1
Signed Сергей Полетаев
Самое время в такую погоду закрыться дома и вайбкодить 💻 Но я же не долбаеб. В клоде есть режим Auto Mode — это когда ты накидал задачу и он пошел ее решать, не дергая тебя. Так ему удалось собрать прототип дизайна будущей платформы за выходные;) А мы провели два дня на автодроме, сгорели на солнце и находили недельную норму шагов 🏎️💨🏁
❤10🔥4👍3😁2
Signed Сергей Полетаев
В этом году наш AI-агент в компании обработал 2199 заявок, средняя стоимость диалога 27 руб.
👍10🔥3
Signed Сергей Полетаев
И еще радует, когда ты и отдел продаж отдыхаете на выходных, а AI-агент обрабатывает заявки в CRM и записывает клиентов на встречу 😎+🤖
🔥5👍3
Signed Сергей Полетаев
Накосячили и забыли отключить AI-агента от crm-системы после тестов интеграции, а он записал первого клиента на пробное занятие лида в школу пения 🤓🔝
👍7🔥6😁1
Signed Сергей Полетаев
Провели встречу с Белопотаповым М.В — первый исполнительный вице-президент МКПП (ICIE). Отвечает за международную кооперацию и работу с деловыми кругами стран СНГ и Азии. Обсудили реализованные проекты за полтора года сотрудничества, их потенциал и куда двигать компанию дальше. 5 часов переговоров 😅 Скоро будет, что показать. Остаемся на связи 😉🫶
🔥13👍12❤7
Signed Сергей Полетаев
Сейчас автоматизируем сеть ресторанов в Казани — что удалось разработать за 3 месяца Сейчас автоматизируем бизнес-процессы в сети ресторанов P.love❤️ в Казани — 10 заведений. Основатель, Нурислам Тахирович Шарифулин, глава Представительства Федерации Рестораторов и Отельеров, как-то рассказал мне историю, которая в красках объяснила ситуацию на рынке общепита. Команда заказала устричный соус. Нужен был килограмм. З…
👍17❤7🔥4
Signed Сергей Полетаев
Showing the 10 most recent of 10 posts we hold for @projectshuk. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.
Stars beside a post are paid reactions — Telegram Stars, bought with money and spent on that post. They are a different unit from reactions and are never added to them, here or anywhere else on this page.
Named by 1 registered channel — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.
Named by
Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.
A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.
The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.
This channel appears in 1 seed channel's Telegram-generated recommendation list in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.
A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 September 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.
“Сергей Полетаев | про AI-assistants в бизнес” (@projectshuk), 2,684 subscribers as measured 3 September 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/projectshuk.
Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.