Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Prolab Beauty • Технологии красоты для вашего дома

Channel

Prolab Beauty • Технологии красоты для вашего дома

@prolab_beauty

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Stars · Posts · Posts recorded as deleted · Citations · Cite this entry

6,261subscribers

+407 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001986283268
TypeChannel
Username@prolab_beauty
CreatedBetween 1 April 2023 and 31 October 2023 — estimated from Telegram’s id allocation, not measured. How this range is calculated.
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live7 November 2026
Measurements held25
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 7 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/prolab_beauty

Topic

Ecommerce storefront — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 98% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

5,6686,2615,964.57 August 2026 — 5,854 subscribers7 August 2026 — 5,854 subscribers8 August 2026 — 5,824 subscribers11 August 2026 — 5,769 subscribers14 August 2026 — 5,683 subscribers17 August 2026 — 5,668 subscribers21 August 2026 — 6,108 subscribers24 August 2026 — 6,254 subscribers27 August 2026 — 6,175 subscribers31 August 2026 — 6,131 subscribers3 September 2026 — 6,083 subscribers8 September 2026 — 6,042 subscribers12 September 2026 — 6,010 subscribers16 September 2026 — 6,050 subscribers1 October 2026 — 6,076 subscribers8 October 2026 — 6,043 subscribers13 October 2026 — 5,950 subscribers16 October 2026 — 6,041 subscribers19 October 2026 — 6,155 subscribers22 October 2026 — 6,172 subscribers26 October 2026 — 6,190 subscribers29 October 2026 — 6,213 subscribers31 October 2026 — 6,245 subscribers3 November 2026 — 6,251 subscribers7 November 2026 — 6,261 subscribers7 August 20267 November 2026
25 measurements spanning 91 days, net +407. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 5,579–6,350 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 25
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
7 Nov 2026, 01:316,261+10
3 Nov 2026, 19:396,251+6
31 Oct 2026, 20:316,245+32
29 Oct 2026, 04:186,213+23
26 Oct 2026, 06:306,190+18
22 Oct 2026, 20:306,172+17
19 Oct 2026, 21:076,155+114
16 Oct 2026, 12:376,041+91
13 Oct 2026, 17:485,950-93
8 Oct 2026, 02:596,043-33
1 Oct 2026, 16:356,076+26
16 Sept 2026, 12:006,050+40
12 Sept 2026, 23:016,010-32
8 Sept 2026, 13:566,042-41
3 Sept 2026, 16:416,083-48
31 Aug 2026, 01:076,131-44
27 Aug 2026, 22:376,175-79
24 Aug 2026, 21:186,254+146
21 Aug 2026, 00:486,108+440
17 Aug 2026, 20:185,668first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 31 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 14 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
5.44%
avg views ÷ 6,261 subscribers
Avg views / post
341
12 posts measured
Reaction rate
6.56%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
12
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 6 November 2026
Posts held25 (31 July 2026 – 6 November 2026)
Views total4,088
Reactions total268
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken6 Nov 2026, 15:00 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Video runtime
1m 37s
Average length
32s

Measured directly from 3 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

835 reactions across 25 posts, in 11 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 48.5% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
❤40548.5%
👍14917.8%
custom 525848488749671794312515.0%
🔥678.02%
😍374.43%
🥰151.80%
custom 5285152756049407375131.56%
😁131.56%
👏80.958%
🎉20.24%
⚡10.12%

Custom emoji. 2 of the rows above are Telegram custom emoji, which the public preview renders as an element carrying only a numeric id — no character, and no image we can reach. The id is printed as-is rather than substituted with a look-alike glyph, because a stand-in would be our invention showing where a measurement should be. The counts beside them are Telegram’s.

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 835 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Telegram Stars

Stars received
1
across the posts below
Posts paid on
1
of 25 we hold a reading for · 4%
Most on one post
1
single highest reading

A paid reaction is a reader spending Telegram Stars — bought with money — on a post by @prolab_beauty. Telegram publishes the count on the public post preview alongside ordinary reactions, and this register reads it there. It is the only figure on this site that measures money moving rather than attention.

Stars are not reactions, and the two are never added. They are rendered in the same strip on Telegram and counted in the same shape, but one is a tap and the other is a purchase. The reaction totals and the engagement rate elsewhere on this page exclude every figure in this section, and no rate here is computed against a reaction count.

This is not revenue, and we publish no currency figure. What a Star costs a reader and what it pays a channel are different numbers, Telegram takes a share we cannot observe, and the terms have changed. Converting a Star count into money would be an estimate dressed as a measurement, so the count is where we stop.

Counted over the 25 most recent posts we hold for this entry, published 31 July 2026 to 6 November 2026. Star counts above 1,000 reach us in Telegram’s short form and carry the same three-significant-figure rounding as everything else on this page.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 12 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

6 Nov 2026, 13:44 UTC69 views6 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Video

EMS: небольшая тренировка для мышц лица ❤️ Когда мы улыбаемся, мышцы получают команду от нервной системы. При EMS похожую команду вызывают электрические импульсы аппарата: мышцы сокращаются и расслабляются. Зачем это нужно? EMS используют для работы с мышечным тонусом. Технология может помочь сделать контуры лица визуально более чёткими, а вид — более подтянутым. Для поддержания результата важна регулярность процед…

❤3custom 52584848874967179432🔥1

5 Nov 2026, 07:28 UTC223 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 52584848874967179438❤6🔥3👍1

4 Nov 2026, 14:42 UTC237 views22 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Горячо или холодно? Ищем факт о микротоках 👀 «Нет покалывания — нет эффекта», «подойдёт любой крем», «аппарат полностью заменяет уход»… Звучит убедительно, но где здесь правда? Мы спрятали среди мифов один факт. Открывайте скрытые карточки, читайте объяснения и следуйте подсказкам, пока не станет горячо 🔥 Теперь вы знаете больше о микротоках. Осталось выбрать своего помощника: • NuFACE — микротоковая технология е…

👍10😍7❤5

3 Nov 2026, 13:23 UTC257 views18 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

PROLAB BEAUTY × AROMA 🍂 Объединили домашний уход, гастрономию и творчество в коллаборации с рестораном AROMA. Вчера собрались на мастер-классе: работали с цветами, пробовали блюда специального меню и знакомили гостей с бьюти-гаджетами L&L SKIN. MAMI, VIA Pro, LENA Pro и LED MASK LUMI можно было рассмотреть вживую и узнать больше об их возможностях. Делимся кадрами со встречи. А для знакомства с аппаратами онлайн …

custom 52584848874967179439❤4👍3😍2

2 Nov 2026, 07:14 UTC384 views25 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Наши бьюти-гаджеты среди номинантов премии «ЯПокупаю Beauty 2026» 🎉 Сейчас открыто голосование, и нам очень нужна ваша поддержка. Мы рассказываем о технологиях, помогаем выбирать устройства и делимся советами по уходу. А сегодня просим вас сделать небольшой шаг навстречу и подарить одному из наших гаджетов свой голос. Как поддержать нас Откройте страницу голосования. Авторизуйтесь через соцсети. выберите один из на…

❤10custom 52584848874967179438👍7

1 Nov 2026, 07:00 UTC312 views21 reactionsread 6 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤10👍6🔥5

31 Oct 2026, 07:00 UTC316 views29 reactionsread 6 November 2026
Photo

Бьюти-ужасы, знакомые без всякой ночи ужасов 👻 Такси уже приехало, волосы ещё мокрые. Устроилась под одеялом — вспомнила про макияж. Собрали знакомые ситуации в карточках и подобрали к ним помощников: ✨RIKA — фен для сушки и укладки перед выходом. 🤍 LENA Pro — аппарат для ухода за кожей вокруг глаз. 🫶EMI Pro — щёточка для очищения кожи после снятия макияжа. 😳 NAMI — фотоэпилятор с охлаждением для постепенного умень…

❤14🥰6😁5😍4

30 Oct 2026, 14:07 UTC321 views22 reactionsread 5 November 2026
Photo

Кадр за кадром: что происходит за одну вспышку 📸 Нажали кнопку — появилась вспышка. Как она помогает избавиться от нежелательных волос? Разложили работу IPL на четыре кадра. Главный участник — меланин, пигмент, который придаёт волосу цвет. Он поглощает свет и превращает его энергию в тепло. Тепло воздействует на фолликул — место, откуда растёт волос. Обработанные волосы выпадают постепенно. С каждой процедурой их…

😍10👍6❤4custom 52584848874967179432

29 Oct 2026, 07:25 UTC486 views28 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Posted without readable text

custom 525848488749671794310😍6❤4👍4custom 52851527560494073754

28 Oct 2026, 14:18 UTC567 views27 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

А если я не увижу результата? Вернём деньги. Выбрать аппарат для домашнего ухода проще, когда есть возможность оценить его в деле Для шести аппаратов L&L SKIN действует гарантия возврата денег Пользуйтесь аппаратом по инструкции 60 дней. Если не увидите результата — вернём деньги Предложение действует на первый заказ и распространяется на MIKO, LENA Pro, MAMI, MIO 2, MIO 1 и LED MASK Сохраните коробку, полную ком…

❤11👍8🔥5custom 52584848874967179433

27 Oct 2026, 13:11 UTC458 views22 reactionsread 4 November 2026

Posted without readable text

❤9custom 52584848874967179437👍5😍1

26 Oct 2026, 13:01 UTC458 views30 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Video

11.11 — дата, за которой скрывается кое-что особенное ❤️ Мы готовим событие, где бьюти-технологии предстанут в совершенно новом формате. 11 ноября в Москве PROLAB BEAUTY откроет свою бьюти-лабораторию: интерактивные зоны, необычные эксперименты с технологиями и одна долгожданная премьера, о которой пока не будем рассказывать все подробности. И вы сможете заглянуть за кулисы этого события вместе с нами! Будем делит…

❤13custom 52584848874967179437custom 52851527560494073756🔥3👍1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @prolab_beauty. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Posts recorded as deleted after publishing

We recorded 1 post on @prolab_beauty as deleted — posts this register held that were missing from the channel’s public page on two separate reads, taken from different network addresses at least an hour apart.

A deletion is not wrongdoing. This register can see that a post it held is no longer on the channel’s public page, and when — not why. Expired ad placements, reposts, rotating links and corrections all look the same. This is a count of recorded detections, not an exact total: it misses deletions we could not see, because only a post we held and later re-read inside the page can be seen to go, and it may include a small number of wrong records. How this is measured.

First seen missing
8 August 2026
Most recent seen missing
8 August 2026
Median time before seen missing
22 hours
Seen missing in the last 30 days
0

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 5 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Names

Channels on the register whose handles appear in this channel's posts.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 7 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Prolab Beauty • Технологии красоты для вашего дома” (@prolab_beauty), 6,261 subscribers as measured 7 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/prolab_beauty.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.