Telegram RegisterThe public register of Telegram
Telegram profile photo for Про AI

Channel

Про AI

@promidgpt

On this record: Topic · Growth · Engagement · What this channel posts · Reactions · Advertising · Posts · Citations · Telegram's recommendations · Cite this entry

7,783subscribers

-145 since we began measuring on 7 August 2026

Risers and fallers across the register · movement among entries of 3,162–10,000.

Register entry

Telegram ID-1001847713296
TypeChannel
Username@promidgpt
DescriptionСобираю свои AI творения с помощью ChatGPT и Midjourney. Автор: @provodin
Created18 March 2023 — measured — cross-checked against a third-party dataset (ext.tg_channel)
First recorded7 August 2026
Last confirmed live3 November 2026
Measurements held24
Confirmed unchanged1 time, most recently 3 November 2026
On Telegramt.me/promidgpt

Topic

Technology — a classification, not a measurement. An on-box language model (Qwen3.6-35B-A3B-FP8, prompt version 1) read this channel’s own recent posts on 12 September 2026 and assigned it the closest of 31 fixed categories, at 100% confidence. This is a model’s judgement about what the channel is likely to be about, not a fact this register measured the way a subscriber count or a view count is measured — it can be revised on a later pass, and it carries no weight anywhere else on this page. How this classification works, and the other topics.

Growth

7,7807,9287,8547 August 2026 — 7,928 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,928 subscribers7 August 2026 — 7,925 subscribers10 August 2026 — 7,915 subscribers14 August 2026 — 7,912 subscribers17 August 2026 — 7,899 subscribers21 August 2026 — 7,886 subscribers24 August 2026 — 7,870 subscribers27 August 2026 — 7,868 subscribers30 August 2026 — 7,850 subscribers2 September 2026 — 7,846 subscribers8 September 2026 — 7,821 subscribers12 September 2026 — 7,806 subscribers16 September 2026 — 7,804 subscribers28 September 2026 — 7,780 subscribers5 October 2026 — 7,809 subscribers12 October 2026 — 7,822 subscribers15 October 2026 — 7,821 subscribers18 October 2026 — 7,809 subscribers21 October 2026 — 7,815 subscribers24 October 2026 — 7,816 subscribers27 October 2026 — 7,809 subscribers30 October 2026 — 7,798 subscribers3 November 2026 — 7,783 subscribers7,7837 August 20263 November 2026
24 measurements spanning 88 days, net -145. Dots are measurements; the straight line between them is drawn to join them, not to claim we know the path taken in between — snapshots are recorded only when a count changes, so gaps mean “no change observed”, never “interpolated”. The vertical axis spans 7,758–7,950 and does not start at zero.
Measurement log — every subscribers count we have recorded, most recent 20 of 24
Measured (UTC)SubscribersChange
3 Nov 2026, 07:167,783-15
30 Oct 2026, 23:047,798-11
27 Oct 2026, 23:467,809-7
24 Oct 2026, 20:507,816+1
21 Oct 2026, 18:217,815+6
18 Oct 2026, 15:507,809-12
15 Oct 2026, 06:577,821-1
12 Oct 2026, 12:407,822+13
5 Oct 2026, 17:577,809+29
28 Sept 2026, 01:597,780-24
16 Sept 2026, 04:597,804-2
12 Sept 2026, 07:367,806-15
8 Sept 2026, 01:397,821-25
2 Sept 2026, 19:377,846-4
30 Aug 2026, 21:287,850-18
27 Aug 2026, 11:157,868-2
24 Aug 2026, 20:377,870-16
21 Aug 2026, 02:357,886-13
17 Aug 2026, 18:227,899-13
14 Aug 2026, 04:577,912first reading

Engagement

25 posts held, back to 5 July 2026 — the reader has not yet reached the start of this channel’s public history, so older posts may sit further back, unread. Read across 23 pages of Telegram’s post history, 20 posts per page.

ERR · 30 days
6.79%
avg views ÷ 7,783 subscribers
Avg views / post
528
10 posts measured
Reaction rate
1.63%
reactions ÷ views · ER floor
Posts in window
10
of 25 held

ERR is average views per post over the last 30 days divided by subscribers, the definition TGStat uses, so this figure is comparable with the one you will see elsewhere. It falls structurally as a channel grows: a high ERR on a small channel and a low one on a large channel describe reach mathematics, not quality. We publish the figure and the sample it came from and pass no verdict on it.

ER is defined industry-wide as (forwards + reactions + comments) ÷ views — note the denominator is views, not subscribers. Telegram’s public web preview carries views and reactions but not forward or comment counts, so the reaction rate above is the reactions term only and is therefore a floor: the true ER for this channel is higher by an amount we have not measured and will not estimate.

What these figures were computed from
WindowRolling 30 days · latest post in window 4 November 2026
Posts held25 (5 July 2026 – 4 November 2026)
Views total5,283
Reactions total86
Forwards / commentsnot exposed by the public surface — not measured, not estimated
Readings taken4 Nov 2026, 23:51 UTC

Views are a single reading per post, taken at the time above. A post published in the last day or two is still accumulating views, which pulls the 30-day average down slightly. That is a property of the standard definition rather than a fault in it, so we keep the definition rather than “correcting” the number into something nobody can reproduce.

Precision. Telegram publishes view counts on its public widget in short form — 8.12K, 3.7M — so any reading at or above 1,000 reaches us rounded to three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. Averages and rates derived from them are shown to the same precision rather than to the unit: a figure like 3,701,250 would assert digits nobody measured.

Reaction counts are published per emoji and rounded the same way, so a total below 1,000 is exact and a larger one is a sum that may carry a rounded component from each emoji above 1,000. Because it is a sum, it does not look rounded — read a large reaction total as three significant figures per contributing emoji rather than as the figure it prints.

What this channel posts

Photos
≈3,800
Videos
≈255
Links
≈1,020

Lifetime counters from Telegram’s own channel header, read 4 November 2026 — not the date at the top of this page, which is when the subscriber count was last read. A count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints these counters in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈142,000 means somewhere between 141,500 and 142,499.

Video runtime
8m 12s
Average length
1m 10s

Measured directly from 7 videos with a duration reading, out of the posts we hold for this channel — not this channel’s whole posting history, only the sample this register has actually read. An exact reading to the second, taken from the post itself rather than from Telegram’s own rounded chrome, so it carries no ≈ mark.

Reaction mix

240 reactions across 25 posts, in 8 distinct kinds. The most used accounts for 32.1% of them.

Every reaction kind recorded on the sample, most used first
ReactionCountShareShare, drawn
🔥7732.1%
❤‍🔥5422.5%
🤯5221.7%
😁2610.8%
👏145.83%
⚡114.58%
😍31.25%
🥰31.25%

No sentiment is inferred, and none should be read in. This table is ordered by count and by nothing else. Emoji do not carry stable meaning across languages or communities — 🙏 is thanks in one channel and mourning in another — so we publish which ones were pressed and how often, and pass no judgement on what an audience meant by them.

Precision. Telegram publishes reaction counts per emoji and short-forms each one — 4.34K, 1.2M — so any single kind at or above 1,000 reaches us at three significant figures, and only counts below 1,000 are exact. The shares above are ratios of those figures and carry the same error. This is also why the total here can differ slightly from a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page: both are sums of the same rounded parts, taken over samples with different edges.

Coverage. Reactions were read on 25 of the 25 sampled posts in this sample. Summed by Telegram’s own count on each post — not by adding up the per-emoji breakdown above — those same posts carry 240 reactions in total: the kind of figure the paragraph above means by “a reaction total printed elsewhere on the page”.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 4 November 2026, using the newest reading held for each. Telegram Stars are excluded: they are a payment, not a reaction, and they have their own section.

Advertising

Ad load
4.00%
1 of 25 posts carry an ad marker
Regulatory tokens
1
posts carrying an erid · 1 distinct token
Median views · ads
510
over 1 measured post
Median views · rest
960
over 24 measured posts

An ad marker, not a judgement about a post. A post is counted here because it carries one of two explicit markings: an erid token, which Russian law has required on paid placements since 2022 and which is issued against a specific advertising contract, or a #реклама / #ad hashtag in the body, which is the channel declaring it itself. The first is documentary; the second is a self-declaration and is weaker. No classifier reads the text and decides — nothing on this site guesses that a post is an advertisement.

This is a floor, and it can only ever be a floor. A channel that runs paid placements without marking them produces no marker for us to count, and an unmarked ad is indistinguishable from an ordinary post on the public surface. The ad load above therefore means “the share of posts that declared themselves”, never “the share of posts that were paid for”. A low figure is not evidence of a channel that runs few ads.

Both figures are medians, and no ratio between them is published. Each is a view reading that actually occurred on a post, picked by percentile_disc rather than averaged, so one viral post cannot move it and no interpolated value is invented between two readings. The sample on one side is under five posts, which is too thin to compare. The two figures are shown side by side with the count behind each, and deliberately not divided into a headline like “ads get x% fewer views” — an arithmetic that is easy to print and, at this sample size, means nothing.

Advertising tokens recorded on this entry
eridPostsFirst seenLast seen
2Vtzqw6gcpj125 August 202625 August 2026

A token repeated across several posts is one advertising contract placed more than once, which is what the identifier is for. The strings are reproduced exactly as they appeared in the post or in its click-through URL and are not validated against any registry — we record the marker a channel published, and whether it resolves to a real contract is a question for the register that issued it.

Measured over the 25 most recent posts we hold, published 5 July 2026 to 4 November 2026. Views are the latest single reading held for each post, and any reading at or above 1,000 is rounded by Telegram to three significant figures.

Recent posts

Telegram’s own ‘edited’ marker: 0 of 10 posts held from the last 30 days (0%) carried it when this register last read them. The marker says a post was changed after publishing, not what it said before — this register holds the earlier wording only where an edit fell between two of its own reads (see the edit ledger and how it is measured).

4 Nov 2026, 13:43 UTC219 views9 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Crimson Techwave 🔴✨ 🎯Prompt: A single [MAIN OBJECT] centered on a pure black background, filling most of a square 1:1 composition. Preserve its recognizable silhouette, transformed into a sleek futuristic product-design sculpture with smooth rounded aerodynamic surfaces, glossy candy-red and crimson materials, deep black inset details, polished edges and subtle magenta, violet and blue reflections. Clean minimal con…

🔥5❤‍🔥4

4 Nov 2026, 12:03 UTC308 views12 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🔭 Claude каждую ночь исследует космос Один пользователь подключил своего ИИ-агента к дистанционно управляемым телескопам в Чили. Теперь Claude самостоятельно наблюдает за небом и присылает хозяину снимки галактик, которые считает особенно красивыми. Пока люди ищут ответы во Вселенной, нейросеть просто залипает на космические пейзажи. Нечеловеческий разум ищет внеземное… или просто эстетичный кадр. 👽 Про AI

❤‍🔥8🔥4

3 Nov 2026, 13:04 UTC404 views3 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

В digital сейчас можно проснуться в понедельник, а к пятнице обнаружить, что привычный рабочий инструмент уже кто-то заменил нейросетью. Разработчики экспериментируют с AI-кодингом, маркетологи собирают собственных агентов, стартапы проверяют гипотезы быстрее, чем успевают оформить презентацию, а новые сервисы появляются буквально каждый день. Но самое интересное обычно не в громких анонсах. А в том, что люди уже д…

❤‍🔥2🔥1

2 Nov 2026, 16:10 UTC452 views13 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Forged Steel Icons ⚙️🔥 🎯Prompt: A single [MAIN OBJECT] centered on a pure black background, filling most of a square 1:1 composition. Preserve its recognizable silhouette, transformed into a rugged industrial sculpture made of yellow-gold and dark gunmetal diamond-plate steel. The entire surface features raised repeating tread patterns, angular metal panels, visible seams, beveled edges and layered three-dimensional…

🔥5❤‍🔥4⚡2🤯2

2 Nov 2026, 07:19 UTC580 views9 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

⚠️ ChatGPT и Codex могут посадить на один лимит С декабря OpenAI, вероятно, объединит ограничения на использование ChatGPT и Codex. Оба сервиса будут расходовать общий запас. То есть если потратить весь лимит на кодинг в Codex, переключиться на ChatGPT и продолжить общение уже не выйдет. Придётся ждать сброса лимита. Пишешь код — сжигаешь лимит на чат. 🫠 Для тех, кто активно пользуется обоими инструментами, это …

🤯9

30 Oct 2026, 11:32 UTC628 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Beaded Folk Tales 🧿✨ 🎯Prompt: A single [MAIN OBJECT] centered on a pure black background, square 1:1 composition. Preserve its recognizable silhouette, rendered as a charming three-dimensional beadwork sculpture made of hundreds of tiny rounded beads arranged in a precise pixel-like grid. Cream and ivory base with warm coral-red, burnt-orange and earthy-brown folk-art patterns integrated into the surface. Tactile ha…

❤‍🔥5⚡2🔥2👏1

30 Oct 2026, 10:44 UTC616 views8 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

🚨 Claude взломал ядро Linux всего за 53 минуты ИИ обнаружил новую критическую уязвимость в Linux с оценкой CVSS 9,8 из 10. Самое неприятное: для атаки не нужны ни аккаунт, ни действия пользователя. Достаточно установить TCP-соединение с сервером. Через эту дыру злоумышленник может получить полный контроль над системой. Патч уже выпущен. Если используете Linux, самое время обновиться. Похоже, ИИ всё чаще находит …

🤯7❤‍🔥1

30 Oct 2026, 07:49 UTC552 views6 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

Topographic Dreams 🌀✨ 🎯Prompt: A single [MAIN OBJECT] centered on a pure black background, filling most of a square 1:1 composition. Preserve its recognizable silhouette, rendered as a smooth three-dimensional sculpture in a soft lavender-blue color. The entire surface is covered with dense flowing parallel grooves and organic topographic contour lines that follow the form, creating a layered ribbed texture. Rounded…

🔥4❤‍🔥2

29 Oct 2026, 12:35 UTC831 views10 reactionsread 4 November 2026
Photo

‼️ Claude начал требовать паспорт у пользователей — россияне жалуются на блокировки Anthropic усилила проверку личности: теперь некоторых пользователей просят подтвердить её официальными документами. Подойдут паспорт, водительские права или ID-карта. По сообщениям пользователей, после проверки некоторые аккаунты блокируют. Риск особенно актуален для россиян, поскольку Claude официально не работает в РФ. Проверку п…

🔥8👏1😁1

29 Oct 2026, 09:39 UTC693 views6 reactionsread 3 November 2026
Photo

⚡️ Google выкатила Gemini 4 Carbon и замахнулась на лидерство в ИИ Новая флагманская модель, по заявлениям компании, обошла GPT-6 Astra и Claude Fable 5.1 и заняла первые места почти во всех бенчмарках. Carbon умеет работать над сложными инженерными задачами часами и, как утверждается, исправляет код в 10 раз эффективнее других передовых моделей. Но попасть к ней сразу не получится: сначала доступ дадут специалист…

🔥3🤯3

25 Aug 2026, 08:09 UTC510 views6 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Advertisementerid 2Vtzqw6gcpjPhoto

Скилл, который приносит автору 10 000 посетителей в месяц, начали раздавать бесплатно. 👀 Артемий Миллер выложил четыре своих рабочих инструмента для Claude Code. «Статейник» пишет статью через 16 этапов на субагентах и сам её публикует - те самые 10 000 посетителей в месяц оттуда. «Автомонтаж» забирает сырой файл с камеры и отдаёт готовый ролик со звуком и субтитрами, монтажёру там делать нечего. Плюс методология …

⚡4❤‍🔥1🔥1

5 Aug 2026, 15:13 UTC≈1,060 views12 reactionsread 28 August 2026
Photo

👨‍⚖️ Московский суд отказался признавать ИИ-картинки объектом авторского права. Автор переработал «Мону Лизу» и Статую Свободы с помощью нейросети, но другой предприниматель начал продавать мерч с этими изображениями без разрешения. Суд решил, что такой результат — это скорее техническая обработка, чем творческая работа. А идея с бокалом вместо факела и вовсе не считается уникальной. Похоже, вопрос авторских прав …

🔥6🤯3❤‍🔥2😁1

Showing the 12 most recent of 25 posts we hold for @promidgpt. View and reaction counts are the latest single reading for each post, not a live figure, and a recent post is still accumulating both. A view count marked ≈ was rounded by Telegram before we ever saw it — t.me prints views in full below 1,000 and to three significant figures above, so ≈1,200,000 means somewhere between 1,150,000 and 1,249,999. Unmarked counts are exact. Text is reproduced from the public post preview and truncated for length.

Forward network

Republished by

Channels on the register that have forwarded this channel's posts into their own feed.

Built only from forwarded posts we have actually read, on both sides. Coverage is early and deliberately incomplete: a missing link means we have not read the post that would prove it, never that the relationship does not exist. Counts are distinct forwarded posts observed, so they only ever go up as we read more.

Mentions

Named by 3 registered channels — every channel on the register whose own posts have named this one, by its current username or any other username it currently holds, merged from two separately captured readings of the same fact so a namer caught by only one of them is not missed and a namer both caught is not counted twice. A username this channel has since dropped is not matched — that handle may belong to someone else now, and crediting today’s namer to yesterday’s owner would misattribute it.

Named by

Channels on the register whose posts name this channel's handle.

A mention is a weaker signal than a forward and is counted separately for that reason — naming a channel is not republishing it, and a handle in a post body is easy to place deliberately. The post counts beside each row below are distinct posts in which the handle appeared, from posts we have read on both sides — the “Named by N registered channels” figure above is a different count, of distinct NAMING CHANNELS rather than posts, and is not the sum of the rows under it.

Appears in Telegram’s recommendations for other channels

The reverse of the list above, and a different kind of signal. This does not require this channel to have ever been asked about directly — each row below is a channel we DID ask Telegram about, whose Telegram-generated list happened to include this one. A channel can appear here with an empty list above it, because being named by someone else’s query is independent of having been queried itself.

Midjourney Prompts Daily
@neirodrive · 19,626
Telegram ranks this channel #20 of 82 here — alongside 81 others — read 30 September 2026
Промпты для нейросетей
@prompty · 29,975
Telegram ranks this channel #41 of 89 here — alongside 88 others — read 7 September 2026
Ринат Шакиров | Промпты для Midjourney | ChatGPT |
@dailyprompts · 42,553
Telegram ranks this channel #52 of 91 here — alongside 90 others — read 29 August 2026
Secret Design
@secretd · 22,124
Telegram ranks this channel #54 of 95 here — alongside 94 others — read 21 September 2026
🟡NeuroGraph
@neyr0graph · 34,320
Telegram ranks this channel #72 of 90 here — alongside 89 others — read 3 September 2026

This channel appears in 5 seed channels' Telegram-generated recommendation lists in total. Each is Telegram’s list for THAT channel, not this one — see how this is measured.

Cite this entry

A live page changes as we take new readings, so a citation should name the measurement it is based on, not just the URL. The line below cites the subscriber count as measured 3 November 2026 — this entry's latest reading, not the date you are reading this.

“Про AI” (@promidgpt), 7,783 subscribers as measured 3 November 2026. Telegram Register, tgregister.com/channel/promidgpt.

Full measurement history, CC BY 4.0. Every reading this register holds for this entry, not just the latest one, as a dated, downloadable record: CSV · JSON. Free to use with attribution to tgregister.com. Each file carries its own generation timestamp, which is the figure to cite for exactly when the data was retrieved.